Ripple 利用币安裁决推动更清晰的加密货币监管指南

总部位于旧金山的区块链公司 Ripple 正在推动针对加密货币制定更明确的监管指南，此前法院最近对一个不相关的案件做出了裁决。

Blockchain firm Ripple is calling for clearer regulatory guidelines for cryptocurrencies after a recent court decision in an unrelated case.

在法院最近对一起不相关案件作出裁决后，区块链公司 Ripple 呼吁对加密货币制定更明确的监管指南。

The move comes amid Ripple’s ongoing legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding the classification of XRP, Ripple’s native token.

此举正值 Ripple 与美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 就 Ripple 原生代币 XRP 的分类问题持续进行法律斗争之际。

Ripple Leverages Binance Ruling

Ripple 利用币安裁决

The matter arises from a June 28 ruling by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The court partially ruled in favor of crypto exchange Binance, dismissing the SEC’s claims that certain digital asset sales constituted unregistered securities offerings. This decision, according to Ripple, hinges on the July 2023 summary judgment in the SEC vs Ripple Labs case.

此事源于美国哥伦比亚特区地方法院 6 月 28 日的裁决。法院部分裁决支持加密货币交易所币安，驳回了 SEC 关于某些数字资产销售构成未注册证券发行的主张。 Ripple 表示，这一决定取决于 2023 年 7 月 SEC 诉 Ripple Labs 案件的简易判决。

In that case, Judge Analisa Torres differentiated between secondary market sales – where investors trade amongst themselves – and direct institutional sales by Ripple itself. Importantly, the court ruled that XRP, as a tradable token, didn’t qualify as a security in the secondary market.

在该案中，法官 Analisa Torres 区分了二级市场销售（投资者之间进行交易）和 Ripple 本身的直接机构销售。重要的是，法院裁定 XRP 作为一种可交易代币，不符合二级市场证券的资格。

However, the court left the door open for the SEC to pursue Ripple for its direct sales to institutions. This distinction between sale methods aligns with the Binance ruling, where Judge Amy Berman Jackson cited the Ripple case as precedent.

然而，法院为 SEC 追究 Ripple 向机构直接销售的责任敞开了大门。销售方法之间的这种区别与币安的裁决一致，艾米·伯曼·杰克逊法官引用了 Ripple 案作为先例。

This, according to Ripple, highlights the critical need for clear regulations that distinguish between different types of cryptocurrency transactions. Ripple further emphasizes a point raised by the court: the current SEC approach of relying on litigation to regulate the industry creates uncertainty for both companies and investors.

Ripple 表示，这凸显了区分不同类型的加密货币交易的明确监管的迫切需要。 Ripple进一步强调了法院提出的一个观点：目前SEC依靠诉讼来监管行业的做法给公司和投资者都带来了不确定性。

Ripple Highlights Regulatory Uncertainty

瑞波币凸显了监管的不确定性

The lack of clear guidelines makes it difficult to determine whether specific actions violate securities laws. Ripple argues that this very uncertainty weakens the SEC’s claim that they knowingly disregarded regulations with their XRP sales.

由于缺乏明确的指导方针，很难确定具体行为是否违反证券法。 Ripple 认为，正是这种不确定性削弱了 SEC 的说法，即他们在销售 XRP 时故意无视法规。

The implication here is that the SEC’s request for hefty fines – exceeding $2 billion – might be excessive in light of the unclear regulatory landscape. Currently, Ripple is locked in a separate dispute with the SEC concerning the appropriate remedies in the case.

这意味着，鉴于监管环境不明确，美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 提出的巨额罚款（超过 20 亿美元）的要求可能有些过高。目前，Ripple 与 SEC 就该案的适当补救措施陷入了另一起争议。

The outcome of these legal battles will have significant implications for the entire cryptocurrency industry. Clearer regulations will not only provide much-needed guidance for companies like Ripple but also foster a more stable environment for investors navigating the ever-evolving digital asset market.

这些法律诉讼的结果将对整个加密货币行业产生重大影响。更明确的监管不仅将为像 Ripple 这样的公司提供急需的指导，还将为投资者在不断发展的数字资产市场中营造更稳定的环境。