首先是名气，然后是加密货币，最后是诉讼

哈莉·韦尔奇 (Haliey Welch)，田纳西州人，今年夏天因一次街头采访而成为网络明星

Haliey Welch, who became an internet sensation earlier this year for her street interview antics, has finally addressed the class action lawsuit filed over her cryptocurrency $HAWK.

Haliey Welch 今年早些时候因其街头采访滑稽动作而成为网络红人，她终于解决了针对她的加密货币 $HAWK 提起的集体诉讼。

In a statement posted on X (formerly Twitter) on Friday, Welch acknowledged the suit but noted that it only names her crypto partners, Alex Larson Schultz (“Doc Hollywood”) and Clinton So, along with So’s platform overHere and the Cayman Islands-based Tuah the Moon Foundation.

周五在 X（前 Twitter）上发布的一份声明中，韦尔奇承认了这起诉讼，但指出，诉讼中只提到了她的加密货币合作伙伴 Alex Larson Schultz（“Doc Hollywood”）和 Clinton So，以及 So 的平台 overHere 和开曼群岛 -位于 Tuah 月球基金会。

"I take this situation extremely seriously and want to address my fans, the investors who have been affected, and the broader community,” Welch wrote. “I am fully cooperating with and am committed to assisting the legal team representing the individuals impacted, as well as to help uncover the truth, hold the responsible parties accountable, and resolve this matter.”

韦尔奇写道：“我非常严肃地对待这一情况，并希望向我的粉丝、受到影响的投资者以及更广泛的社区发表讲话。”“我将全力配合并致力于协助代表受影响个人的法律团队，因为并协助查明真相，追究相关责任人的责任，解决此事。”

She went on to advise those who lost money on $HAWK to contact Burwick Law, the firm that filed the suit against Schultz and So and advertised its services on X in the immediate aftermath of the coin crash.

她接着建议那些在 $HAWK 上蒙受损失的人联系 Burwick Law，该公司对 Schultz and So 提起诉讼，并在硬币崩盘后立即在 X 上宣传其服务。

"I will continue to keep you updated on any further developments,” Welch added.

韦尔奇补充道：“我将继续向您通报任何进一步的进展。”

The suit, filed in federal court in Manhattan, includes a dozen plaintiffs who claim to have collectively lost more than $150,000 in the $HAWK debacle. It alleges that the defendants “leveraged Welch’s celebrity status and connections” and “created a speculative frenzy” in order to jack up the coin’s price as trading began, ultimately luring in “first-time cryptocurrency participants” who were drawn to the project as fans of Welch.

该诉讼向曼哈顿联邦法院提起，包括十几名原告，他们声称在 $HAWK 事故中总共损失了超过 15 万美元。据称，被告“利用韦尔奇的名人地位和人脉”并“制造投机狂潮”，以便在交易开始时抬高代币的价格，最终吸引“首次加密货币参与者”，他们作为粉丝被该项目吸引韦尔奇的。

The complaint contends that Schultz and So violated securities laws, and even indicated their efforts to skirt those laws on the Spaces call. It notes, too, that $HAWK was never registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

诉状称，舒尔茨等人违反了证券法，甚至在 Spaces 电话会议上表示他们试图规避这些法律。它还指出，$HAWK 从未在美国证券交易委员会注册。

The choice to go after Welch’s collaborators rather than the self-described “Queen. of Memes” herself suggests what many observers have already assumed: that she played no meaningful role in how $HAWK was conceived or distributed, serving merely as a face to market the token.

选择追捕韦尔奇的合作者而不是自称的“女王”。 Memes 本人提出了许多观察家已经假设的内容：她在 $HAWK 的构思或分发方式中没有发挥任何有意义的作用，仅充当代币营销的代言人。

As YouTuber Stephen Findeisen, who investigates crypto fraud under the handle Coffeezilla, reported earlier this month, Welch had received an up-front payment of $125,000 to promote the coin to her community, along with 50 percent of net trading proceeds after operating costs paid to third parties. This is in addition to owning 10 percent of the entire $HAWK supply, which she cannot sell for a year.

正如负责调查 Coffeezilla 下的加密货币欺诈行为的 YouTuber Stephen Findeisen 本月早些时候报道的那样，韦尔奇收到了 125,000 美元的预付款，用于向她的社区推广该加密货币，以及支付运营成本后的净交易收益的 50%第三方。除此之外，她还拥有 $HAWK 全部供应量的 10%，而她一年内无法出售这些供应量。

Whether those stakes will amount to anything is anyone’s guess.

任何人都在猜测这些赌注是否会产生任何影响。