CETUS（基于SUI的DEX）反映Crema Finance的黑客和赏金策略

赏金提出的提议要收回基于SUI的分散交易所（DEX）CETU非常类似于Solana使用的成功策略

The bounty offer to recover stolen funds from Sui-based decentralized exchange (DEX) Cetus closely resembles a successful strategy used by a Solana project three years ago.

赏金提出的旨在收回基于SUI的分散交易所（DEX）CETU的偷窃资金与三年前Solana项目使用的成功策略非常相似。

It turns out that Cetus shares the same development team with Crema Finance, a Solana-based DeFi project that suffered a $9-million hack in 2022 but recovered most of the funds by negotiating with its hacker. Now, Cetus is relying on the same strategy.

事实证明，Cetus与Crema Finance分享了相同的开发团队，Crema Finance是一个基于Solana的Defi项目，在2022年遭受了900万美元的黑客攻击，但通过与黑客谈判通过谈判获得了大部分资金。现在，Cetus依靠相同的策略。

Cetus is asking the hacker to return all but $6 million, or 2,324 Ether (ETH), of the stolen funds in exchange for a promise not to pursue legal action. The protocol lost $223 million to an exploit on May 22.

Cetus要求黑客退还被盗资金的600万美元（ETH）（ETH）以外的所有资金，以换取不采取法律诉讼的承诺。该协议于5月22日损失了2.23亿美元。

The size of the bounty has sparked backlash from users, with many calling for a formal compensation plan instead. Several community members argue that even if funds are recovered, most of the damage has already been done — especially to holders of the CETUS token, which plummeted in value following the incident.

赏金的大小引起了用户的反对，许多人要求制定正式的薪酬计划。几个社区成员认为，即使收回了资金，大多数损害已经造成，尤其是对于Cetus代币的持有者，事件发生后的价值下降了。

Meanwhile, Sui validators are also under fire for their role in freezing the funds. The move is aimed at aiding recovery, yet critics say it exposes centralization risks in the network.

同时，SUI验证者在冻结资金中的作用也受到了抨击。此举旨在帮助恢复，但批评家表示，它暴露了网络中的集中化风险。

Sui’s Cetus devs have a phantom exchange on Solana

Sui的Cetus开发人员对Solana进行了幻影交流

A similar negotiation strategy used by the Cetus team on Sui was successfully employed years ago to recover funds for Crema. The Solana project hasn’t posted on its X account since March 2023, and its trading platform now sees negligible volume, but it still didn’t end well for the hacker.

几年前，CETUS团队在SUI上使用的类似的谈判策略已成功地为CREMA收回资金。自2023年3月以来，Solana Project一直没有在其X帐户上发布，其交易平台现在认为数量微不足道，但对于黑客来说，它的结局仍然不错。

Crema suffered an approximately $9-million hack in 2022. Much like the Cetus case, the Crema hacker was offered a deal to return the funds while keeping $1.6 million in exchange for not reporting the attack to law enforcement.

克雷马（Crema）在2022年遭受了约900万美元的黑客攻击。与Cetus案一样，Crema Hacker获得了一笔交易来退还资金的协议，同时保留160万美元，以换取不向执法部门报告袭击的情况。

The hacker is believed to have been caught and sent to prison. In April 2024, the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York sentenced Shakeeb Ahmed to three years in prison for hacking two separate cryptocurrency exchanges. One was identified as Nirvana Finance, while the other was not named.

据信该黑客被捕并被送入监狱。 2024年4月，纽约南部地区的美国检察官办公室因黑客攻击了两次单独的加密货币交易所而判处Shakeeb Ahmed入狱三年。一个被确定为Nirvana Finance，而另一个则没有命名。

The details of the unnamed exchange’s case match Crema’s hack, including the exact date of the exploit and the terms of the agreement.

未透露姓名的案件的详细信息匹配了Crema的黑客攻击，包括剥削的确切日期和协议条款。

Norbert Bodziony, founder of Nightly App, claims the Cetus team was behind Crema Finance.

Nightly App的创始人Norbert Bodziony声称CETUS团队是Crema Finance的支持。

Bodziony declined to disclose how he learned of the relationship to Cointelegraph but added that the connection is “commonly known” in Sui’s developer circles.

Bodziony拒绝透露他如何了解与Cointelegraph的关系，但补充说，这种联系在Sui的开发人员圈子中是“众所周知的”。

Cointelegraph reached out to Cetus to confirm the connection between the two projects, but the team had not responded by publication.

Cointelegraph与CETUS联系以确认两个项目之间的联系，但团队没有通过出版物做出回应。

Cointelegraph has separately learned that both projects are founded by Henry Du.

Cointelegraph已单独了解到，这两个项目都是由亨利·杜（Henry Du）建立的。

Save Cetus; centralize Sui

保存cetus;集中sui

Sui’s validators have collectively blocked transactions from the hacker’s addresses, effectively freezing $162 million of the stolen funds on Sui. Around $63 million had already been bridged to Ethereum before these controls were implemented.

SUI的验证者已从黑客的地址中统一阻止了交易，有效地冻结了Sui的盗窃资金中的1.62亿美元。在实施这些控件之前，已经将约6300万美元桥接到以太坊。

Although the coordinated effort has been effective in preventing the funds from being laundered, the cryptocurrency community has criticized Sui for being too centralized.

尽管协调的努力在防止资金被洗钱方面有效，但加密货币社区批评Sui太集中了。

“SUI’s validators are colluding to CENSOR the hacker’s TXs right now! Does that make SUI centralized? The short answer is YES; what matters more is why? The ‘founders’ own the majority of supply & there are only 114 validators!” Justin Bons, founder of Cyber Capital, wrote on X.

“ Sui的验证者现在正在核算黑客的TXS！这使SUI集中了吗？简短的答案是肯定的；更重要的是，为什么？“创始人”拥有大部分供应，只有114个验证者！”网络资本的创始人贾斯汀·邦斯（Justin Bons）在X上写道。

As Bons pointed out, Sui has just 114 validators — far fewer than its more established smart contract peers. Ethereum has over 1 million validators, while Solana has 1,157.

正如Bons指出的那样，Sui只有114个验证者，远远少于其既定的智能合同同行。以太坊拥有超过100万个验证器，而Solana有1,157。

Meanwhile, members of the Sui community defended the move, arguing that this is how real-world decentralized chains should function.

同时，SUI社区的成员为此举辩护，认为这就是现实世界的分散链应该运作的方式。

“Decentralization isn’t about standing by while people get hurt, it’s about the power to act together, without needing permission,” said one member of the Sui community.

SUI社区的一位成员说：“权力下放并不是要在人们受到伤害时站立，而是在不需要许可的情况下共同行动的权力。”

Following the hack, Sui developers committed code for a proposed function that would have allowed specific transactions to bypass all signing and safety checks by adding them to a whitelist.

在黑客之后，SUI开发人员为提出的功能提供了代码，该功能将允许特定的交易通过将其添加到白名单中来绕过所有签名和安全检查。

While the function could have been used to help recover stolen funds, it also raised concerns about centralized control and the erosion of decentralization. The code was ultimately not merged and is not live on the network.

虽然该功能本来可以用来帮助恢复被盗资金，但它也引起了人们对集中控制和权力下放侵蚀的担忧。该代码最终没有合并，并且不在网络上。

Sui and Cetus backlash contrasts recent hacks

SUI和CETUS反弹对比了最近的黑客

The Cetus exploit has spotlighted the persistent security challenges in DeFi while raising deeper questions about who holds the reins in supposedly decentralized networks like Sui.

CETUS漏洞利用了DEFI的持续安全挑战，同时提出了关于谁在SUI等分散的网络中掌权的更深入的疑问。

The team’s $6-million offer to the hacker mirrors the playbook it used with Crema — but this time, the crypto community isn’t as forgiving. With CETUS tanking, trust fractured and validators freezing funds, critics are asking whether Sui’s decentralization is more appearance than reality.

该团队向黑客提供的600万美元报价反映了与Crema一起使用的剧本，但是这次，加密社区并不那么宽容。鉴于Cetus坦克，信任破裂和验证者冻结了资金，批评者正在询问Sui的权力下放是否比现实更多。

The debate over decentralization isn’t unique to Sui. When Bybit lost

关于权力下放的辩论并不是SUI独有的。当拜百比输掉时