Vitalik Buterin、比特幣核心和麥克斯韋的立場：駕馭自由、創新和爭議

探討 Vitalik Buterin 對比特幣核心原則的看法、Greg Maxwell 對開放市場的捍衛，以及圍繞比特幣核心更新正在進行的辯論。

The Bitcoin ecosystem is no stranger to debate, and recent discussions involving Vitalik Buterin, Bitcoin Core developer Greg Maxwell, and the latest Bitcoin Core updates highlight the tensions between freedom, innovation, and the core tenets of the network.

比特幣生態系統對爭論並不陌生，最近涉及 Vitalik Buterin、Bitcoin Core 開發人員 Greg Maxwell 的討論以及最新的 Bitcoin Core 更新凸顯了自由、創新和網絡核心原則之間的緊張關係。

Maxwell's Principled Stance on Freedom

麥克斯韋對自由的原則立場

Vitalik Buterin recently spotlighted a BitcoinTalk discussion where Greg Maxwell defended the Bitcoin core team's approach. Maxwell emphasized that Bitcoin is built on economic incentives and self-interest, not popular opinion or censorship. He argued that tolerating some 'wasteful or silly activity' is a necessary trade-off for maintaining an open and censorship-resistant network.

Vitalik Buterin 最近關注了 BitcoinTalk 的一場討論，其中 Greg Maxwell 為比特幣核心團隊的方法進行了辯護。麥克斯韋強調，比特幣是建立在經濟激勵和自身利益之上的，而不是民意或審查制度。他認為，容忍一些“浪費或愚蠢的活動”是維持開放和抗審查網絡的必要權衡。

Buterin summarized Maxwell's view as 'a principled commitment to freedom and open market-based resource allocation against the populist desire to censor the Current Hated Thing.' Maxwell asserted that contributors work for themselves, aiming for a system they can trust, not necessarily a product designed to please every user. This perspective acknowledges the presence of NFTs and 'shitcoins' as a cost of maintaining an open system.

Buterin 將麥克斯韋的觀點概括為“對自由和基於開放市場的資源分配的原則性承諾，反對民粹主義審查當前令人討厭的事物的願望。”麥克斯韋斷言，貢獻者為自己工作，目標是建立一個他們可以信任的系統，而不一定是一個旨在取悅每個用戶的產品。這種觀點承認 NFT 和“垃圾幣”的存在是維護開放系統的成本。

Community Pushback and Buterin's Defense

社區的抵制和 Buterin 的辯護

Maxwell's comments sparked debate, with some critics arguing that contributors are also users of Bitcoin. Buterin defended Maxwell's position, suggesting that he views a good protocol as a work of art, where the system's design takes precedence over individual complaints. This illustrates the ongoing tension between strict technical rules and reactions to social pressures within the Bitcoin community.

麥克斯韋的言論引發了爭論，一些批評者認為貢獻者也是比特幣的用戶。 Buterin 為 Maxwell 的立場辯護，表示他將良好的協議視為一件藝術品，系統的設計優先於個人投訴。這說明嚴格的技術規則與比特幣社區內對社會壓力的反應之間持續存在緊張關係。

Bitcoin Core v30: Innovation vs. Purity

比特幣核心 v30：創新與純粹

The release of Bitcoin Core version 30.0 has stirred up controversy, particularly regarding the increase in OP_RETURN data size to 100,000 bytes. This update allows for embedding more non-financial information in transactions, leading some to fear the network could become a giant storage platform.

Bitcoin Core 30.0 版本的發布引起了爭議，特別是關於 OP_RETURN 數據大小增加到 100,000 字節的爭議。此更新允許在交易中嵌入更多非財務信息，導致一些人擔心該網絡可能成為一個巨大的存儲平台。

Critics, like Ox HaK, argue that removing OP_RETURN limits opens the door to useless data, inscriptions, and increased fees, harming ordinary users. They believe Bitcoin's strength lies in its minimalism. This debate echoes the 2017 Blocksize Wars, highlighting the persistent tension between those who favor maintaining Bitcoin's original vision and those who advocate for innovation.

Ox HaK 等批評者認為，取消 OP_RETURN 限制會導致無用數據、銘文和費用增加，從而損害普通用戶的利益。他們認為比特幣的優勢在於其極簡主義。這場辯論與 2017 年的區塊大小戰爭相呼應，凸顯了那些支持維持比特幣最初願景的人和主張創新的人之間持續存在的緊張關係。

Alternative Approaches and Concerns

替代方法和擔憂

In response to these changes, a growing number of node operators are opting for Bitcoin Knots, an alternative software that maintains the old OP_RETURN limits. According to BitRef data, over 21% of Bitcoin nodes already use Knots. Luke Dashjr, the creator of Bitcoin Knots, has expressed concerns about legal risks related to hosting illicit content. Nick Szabo has also warned about the potential for criminal liability for node operators without mechanisms to easily delete illegal content.

為了應對這些變化，越來越多的節點運營商選擇 Bitcoin Knots，這是一種保留舊 OP_RETURN 限制的替代軟件。根據 BitRef 數據，超過 21% 的比特幣節點已經使用 Knots。 Bitcoin Knots 的創建者 Luke Dashjr 對託管非法內容相關的法律風險表示擔憂。 Nick Szabo 還警告說，如果沒有輕鬆刪除非法內容的機制，節點運營商可能會承擔刑事責任。

A Glimpse into Ethereum's Advancements

以太坊的進步一覽

While Bitcoin grapples with these debates, Vitalik Buterin has also been actively involved in Ethereum's advancements. He recently praised Brevis's Pico Prism, a zkVM designed for real-time Ethereum block proving. Pico Prism achieves impressive results, proving 99.6% of current Ethereum blocks in under 12 seconds, averaging just 6.9 seconds using 64 RTX 5090 GPUs. This breakthrough could lead to higher gas limits, lower transaction fees, and more complex DeFi operations on Ethereum.

在比特幣努力應對這些爭論的同時，Vitalik Buterin 也積極參與了以太坊的進步。他最近讚揚了 Brevis 的 Pico Prism，這是一種專為實時以太坊區塊證明而設計的 zkVM。 Pico Prism 取得了令人印象深刻的結果，在 12 秒內證明了 99.6% 的當前以太坊區塊，使用 64 個 RTX 5090 GPU 時平均只需 6.9 秒。這一突破可能會帶來更高的 Gas 限制、更低的交易費用以及以太坊上更複雜的 DeFi 操作。

The Never-Ending Story

永無止境的故事

The discussions surrounding Vitalik Buterin, Bitcoin Core, and Maxwell's stance highlight the dynamic nature of the cryptocurrency world. It's a constant push and pull between preserving core principles and embracing new possibilities. Whether it's navigating censorship debates or pushing the boundaries of blockchain technology, the conversation never truly ends, does it? And honestly, that's what keeps things interesting, right?

圍繞 Vitalik Buterin、Bitcoin Core 和 Maxwell 立場的討論凸顯了加密貨幣世界的動態本質。這是保留核心原則和擁抱新可能性之間不斷的推拉。無論是引導審查制度的辯論還是突破區塊鏈技術的界限，對話永遠不會真正結束，不是嗎？老實說，這就是讓事情變得有趣的原因，對吧？