眾議員布拉德·謝爾曼（Brad Sherman）的說法，即蒂克托克（Tiktok）所有者正在用紀念特朗普（Memecoins）賄賂特朗普是錯誤的。該指控針對錯誤的公司。這是故障。

TikTok, a US Lawmaker, and a False Accusation: What's the Deal?

蒂克托克（Tiktok）是美國議員，也是一個虛假的指控：這是怎麼回事？

In the ever-twisting saga of TikTok's presence in the US, a new plot twist has emerged: a US lawmaker making some pretty wild accusations. Buckle up, because it involves memecoins, alleged bribery, and a whole lot of confusion.

在蒂克托克（Tiktok）在美國的存在的奇異傳奇中，出現了一個新的情節轉折：一位美國議員作出了一些非常瘋狂的指控。扣緊了，因為它涉及模因，涉嫌賄賂和很多混亂。

The Accusation: A $300 Million Memecoin Bribe?

指控是：3億美元的Memecoin賄賂？

Rep. Brad Sherman, a Democrat from California, recently claimed that TikTok's owners were buying a cool $300 million worth of memecoins associated with former President Donald Trump. His reasoning? He thinks it's a sly attempt to influence discussions about banning the app in the US. Sherman even suggested this acquisition would violate the law requiring ByteDance (TikTok's parent company) to sell its US operations. According to Sherman, Trump granting extensions would be illegal and this whole memecoin thing is a straight-up bribe.

來自加利福尼亞州的民主黨人眾議員布拉德·謝爾曼（Brad Sherman）最近聲稱，蒂克托克（Tiktok）的所有者正在購買與前總統唐納德·特朗普（Donald Trump）相關的價值3億美元的成員。他的理由？他認為這是一種狡猾的嘗試，以影響有關在美國禁止該應用程序的討論。謝爾曼甚至建議這項收購將違反要求野獸（Tiktok的母公司）出售其美國業務的法律。據謝爾曼（Sherman）稱，特朗普（Trump）授予延期是非法的，而整個Memecoin的事情都是直接的賄賂。

TikTok's Swift Rebuttal

蒂克托克的迅速反駁

TikTok didn't waste any time clapping back. In a sharp response on X, they called Sherman's claim "patently false and irresponsible." Ouch. They even pointed out that the claim doesn't align with a letter Sherman himself signed last month. It's like they're saying, "Dude, get your facts straight!"

Tiktok沒有浪費任何時間鼓掌。在對X的敏銳反應中，他們稱謝爾曼的主張為“顯然是虛假的，不負責任”。哎喲。他們甚至指出，這一說法與上個月謝爾曼本人簽署的信件並不符合。就像他們在說：“伙計，讓您的事實直截了當！”

The Real Story: A Case of Mistaken Identity?

真實的故事：身份錯誤的情況？

Here's where things get interesting. Investigations suggest the actual plan to acquire the TRUMP memecoin is linked to GD Culture Group, a Nasdaq-listed company based in Nevada. This group announced a deal to sell up to $300 million in shares to a British Virgin Islands investor. Part of their treasury strategy? Buying Bitcoin and Trump's official memecoin. The key point here is that despite GD Culture Group working with TikTok on digital and AI services, they have no corporate relationship with ByteDance. Sherman's accusation seems to be directed at the wrong target.

這是事情變得有趣的地方。調查表明，收購特朗普紀念因素的實際計劃與內華達州的納斯達克上市公司GD文化集團有關。該集團宣布了一項交易，向英屬維爾京群島投資者出售高達3億美元的股票。他們的國庫策略的一部分？購買比特幣和特朗普的官方紀念品。這裡的關鍵是，儘管GD文化小組與Tiktok合作進行了數字和AI服務，但他們與BONDENCE沒有公司關係。謝爾曼的指控似乎是針對錯誤的目標。

So, What's the Takeaway?

那麼，收穫是什麼？

In a world of rapid-fire information and heated debates, this situation highlights the importance of verifying claims before blasting them across social media. It appears a US lawmaker jumped the gun, and spread what seems to be an unconfirmed accusation. Whether intentional or not, such actions can fuel misinformation and damage reputations.

在一個快速的信息和激烈辯論的世界中，這種情況強調了在跨社交媒體爆炸之前驗證主張的重要性。看來，美國議員跳了槍，並散佈了似乎未經證實的指控。無論是否有意，這種行動都可以促進錯誤信息和損害聲譽。

Final Thoughts

最後的想法

In the grand scheme of things, this memecoin melodrama serves as a reminder that not everything you read online is gospel. So, next time you see a juicy accusation, take a beat, do some digging, and remember: sometimes, the truth is stranger (and funnier) than fiction!

在宏偉的方案中，這款Memecoin情節劇院提醒您，並非您在網上閱讀的所有內容都是福音。因此，下次您看到多汁的指控，打敗，做一些挖掘，並記住：有時候，事實比小說更陌生（更有趣）！