市值: $2.0814T 2.03%
體積(24小時): $64.4262B -39.11%
  • 市值: $2.0814T 2.03%
  • 體積(24小時): $64.4262B -39.11%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $2.0814T 2.03%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$87959.907984 USD

1.34%

ethereum
ethereum

$2920.497338 USD

3.04%

tether
tether

$0.999775 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.237324 USD

8.12%

bnb
bnb

$860.243768 USD

0.90%

solana
solana

$138.089498 USD

5.43%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999807 USD

0.01%

tron
tron

$0.272801 USD

-1.53%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.150904 USD

2.96%

cardano
cardano

$0.421635 USD

1.97%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$32.152445 USD

2.23%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$533.301069 USD

-1.94%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.953417 USD

2.68%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.535951 USD

0.73%

zcash
zcash

$521.483386 USD

-2.87%

加密貨幣新聞文章

Solana,量子計算機和比特幣開發人員:與時間的競賽?

2025/09/20 21:05

Solana的聯合創始人警告比特幣開發人員有關迫在眉睫的量子計算威脅。是時候採取行動了,還是比特幣安全?

Solana,量子計算機和比特幣開發人員:與時間的競賽?

The buzz around 'Solana, Quantum computers, Bitcoin developers' is getting louder. Solana's co-founder, Anatoly Yakovenko, is raising alarms about quantum computing's potential to crack Bitcoin's cryptography. Should Bitcoin developers be hitting the panic button?

圍繞“ Solana,Quantum Computers,Bitcoin開發人員”的嗡嗡聲越來越大。 Solana的聯合創始人Anatoly Yakovenko正在引起有關量子計算可能破解比特幣加密技術的潛力的警報。比特幣開發人員應該按下恐慌按鈕嗎?

The Quantum Clock is Ticking

量子時鐘在滴答

Yakovenko, speaking at the All-In Summit 2025, estimates a '50/50' chance of a quantum computing breakthrough within five years. That's not a lot of time when you're talking about potentially compromising the security of the world's leading cryptocurrency. He's urging Bitcoin developers to migrate to a quantum-resistant signature scheme ASAP.

Yakovenko在《全幕2025年》上發表講話,估計五年內量子計算突破的機會是“ 50/50”的機會。當您談論可能損害世界領先的加密貨幣的安全性時,這並不是很多時候。他敦促比特幣開發人員盡快遷移到抗量子的簽名方案。

Why the Worry? Shor's Algorithm and Bitcoin's Vulnerability

為什麼要擔心? Shor的算法和比特幣的脆弱性

Bitcoin relies on Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). While classical computers would struggle to crack it, quantum computers, leveraging algorithms like Shor's, could potentially break this encryption. This isn't just theoretical; Google's Quantum AI researchers have been echoing similar concerns. The difficulty of breaking RSA encryption has already decreased, which means ECC might be next.

比特幣依賴橢圓曲線數字簽名算法(ECDSA)。儘管古典計算機將難以破解它,但利用Shor's等算法的量子計算機可能會破壞這種加密。這不僅僅是理論上; Google的量子AI研究人員一直在回應類似的問題。破壞RSA加密的困難已經減少,這意味著ECC可能是下一個。

Bitcoin Developers: Time to Step Up?

比特幣開發人員:該加緊的時間?

The challenge lies in upgrading Bitcoin's cryptography. A move to post-quantum security would likely require a hard fork, a process notoriously contentious within the Bitcoin community. Think back to the block size debates – this could be even messier. However, Yakovenko argues that delaying action could be catastrophic. Billions in digital assets could be at risk.

挑戰在於升級比特幣的密碼學。轉向量子後安全性可能需要硬叉,這是比特幣社區中臭名昭著的過程。回想一下大小的辯論 - 這甚至可能更加混亂。但是,Yakovenko認為延遲行動可能是災難性的。數十億美元的數字資產可能有風險。

Solana's Taking Notes

Solana在做筆記

While Bitcoin grapples with this potential threat, other blockchain projects, like Solana, are already exploring quantum-resistant cryptographic solutions. They're hoping to avoid the scramble that Bitcoin might face. Layer-2 networks and sidechains are also part of the conversation, though their security ultimately depends on the main blockchain's resilience.

儘管比特幣應對這種潛在威脅,但其他區塊鏈項目(例如Solana)已經在探索抗量子的加密解決方案。他們希望避免比特幣可能面臨的爭奪。第2層網絡和Sidechains也是對話的一部分,儘管它們的安全性最終取決於主要區塊鏈的彈性。

The Contrarian View: Is Bitcoin Safe Enough?

逆勢觀點:比特幣足夠安全嗎?

Not everyone's convinced that the sky is falling. Some Bitcoin advocates, like Adam Back of Blockstream, believe that the quantum threat is still a ways off – perhaps 20 years. Samson Mow of Jan3 suggests that Bitcoin's existing security infrastructure is robust enough for at least another decade. These experts suggest the upgrade is not as urgent as Yakovenko stated.

並不是每個人都相信天空正在下降。一些比特幣的擁護者,例如Backstream的Adam,認為量子威脅仍然是一路,也許是20年。 JAN3的Samson Mow表明,至少十年來,比特幣現有的安全基礎架構足夠強大。這些專家認為,升級不像Yakovenko所說的那樣緊迫。

Personal View: The Need for Prudent Action

個人觀點:審慎行動的需求

While complete consensus on the urgency of the situation is lacking, ignoring the potential risk is irresponsible. Yakovenko's warning acts as a reminder that technological progress can disrupt established systems. It's better to be proactive than reactive, especially when dealing with something as valuable as Bitcoin.

儘管缺乏對情況的緊迫性達成共識,但忽略潛在風險是不負責任的。 Yakovenko的警告提醒人們,技術進步可能會破壞已建立的系統。主動要比反應性更好,尤其是在處理像比特幣這樣有價值的東西時。

Looking Ahead

展望未來

Whether through protocol upgrades or the adoption of post-quantum cryptography, decisive steps will be needed to maintain trust and protect digital assets. The cryptocurrency landscape is evolving, and security must evolve alongside it. After all, who wants their Bitcoin disappearing into the quantum realm? Certainly not this New Yorker. Stay vigilant, folks!

無論是通過協議升級還是採用後量子加密術,都需要進行決定性的步驟,以維持信任和保護數字資產。加密貨幣景觀正在發展,安全必須隨之發展。畢竟,誰希望他們的比特幣消失在量子領域中?當然不是這個紐約客。伙計們保持警惕!

原始來源:coinspeaker

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2026年06月28日 其他文章發表於