市值: $2.0802T 0.61%
成交额(24h): $73.3078B -29.96%
  • 市值: $2.0802T 0.61%
  • 成交额(24h): $73.3078B -29.96%
  • 恐惧与贪婪指数:
  • 市值: $2.0802T 0.61%
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
热门新闻
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
bitcoin
bitcoin

$87959.907984 USD

1.34%

ethereum
ethereum

$2920.497338 USD

3.04%

tether
tether

$0.999775 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.237324 USD

8.12%

bnb
bnb

$860.243768 USD

0.90%

solana
solana

$138.089498 USD

5.43%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999807 USD

0.01%

tron
tron

$0.272801 USD

-1.53%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.150904 USD

2.96%

cardano
cardano

$0.421635 USD

1.97%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$32.152445 USD

2.23%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$533.301069 USD

-1.94%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.953417 USD

2.68%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.535951 USD

0.73%

zcash
zcash

$521.483386 USD

-2.87%

加密货币新闻

Solana,量子计算机和比特币开发人员:与时间的竞赛?

2025/09/20 21:05

Solana的联合创始人警告比特币开发人员有关迫在眉睫的量子计算威胁。是时候采取行动了,还是比特币安全?

Solana,量子计算机和比特币开发人员:与时间的竞赛?

The buzz around 'Solana, Quantum computers, Bitcoin developers' is getting louder. Solana's co-founder, Anatoly Yakovenko, is raising alarms about quantum computing's potential to crack Bitcoin's cryptography. Should Bitcoin developers be hitting the panic button?

围绕“ Solana,Quantum Computers,Bitcoin开发人员”的嗡嗡声越来越大。 Solana的联合创始人Anatoly Yakovenko正在引起有关量子计算可能破解比特币加密技术的潜力的警报。比特币开发人员应该按下恐慌按钮吗?

The Quantum Clock is Ticking

量子时钟在滴答

Yakovenko, speaking at the All-In Summit 2025, estimates a '50/50' chance of a quantum computing breakthrough within five years. That's not a lot of time when you're talking about potentially compromising the security of the world's leading cryptocurrency. He's urging Bitcoin developers to migrate to a quantum-resistant signature scheme ASAP.

Yakovenko在《全幕2025年》上发表讲话,估计五年内量子计算突破的机会是“ 50/50”的机会。当您谈论可能损害世界领先的加密货币的安全性时,这并不是很多时候。他敦促比特币开发人员尽快迁移到抗量子的签名方案。

Why the Worry? Shor's Algorithm and Bitcoin's Vulnerability

为什么要担心? Shor的算法和比特币的脆弱性

Bitcoin relies on Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). While classical computers would struggle to crack it, quantum computers, leveraging algorithms like Shor's, could potentially break this encryption. This isn't just theoretical; Google's Quantum AI researchers have been echoing similar concerns. The difficulty of breaking RSA encryption has already decreased, which means ECC might be next.

比特币依赖椭圆曲线数字签名算法(ECDSA)。尽管古典计算机将难以破解它,但利用Shor's等算法的量子计算机可能会破坏这种加密。这不仅仅是理论上; Google的量子AI研究人员一直在回应类似的问题。破坏RSA加密的困难已经减少,这意味着ECC可能是下一个。

Bitcoin Developers: Time to Step Up?

比特币开发人员:该加紧的时间?

The challenge lies in upgrading Bitcoin's cryptography. A move to post-quantum security would likely require a hard fork, a process notoriously contentious within the Bitcoin community. Think back to the block size debates – this could be even messier. However, Yakovenko argues that delaying action could be catastrophic. Billions in digital assets could be at risk.

挑战在于升级比特币的密码学。转向量子后安全性可能需要硬叉,这是比特币社区中臭名昭著的过程。回想一下大小的辩论 - 这甚至可能更加混乱。但是,Yakovenko认为延迟行动可能是灾难性的。数十亿美元的数字资产可能有风险。

Solana's Taking Notes

Solana在做笔记

While Bitcoin grapples with this potential threat, other blockchain projects, like Solana, are already exploring quantum-resistant cryptographic solutions. They're hoping to avoid the scramble that Bitcoin might face. Layer-2 networks and sidechains are also part of the conversation, though their security ultimately depends on the main blockchain's resilience.

尽管比特币应对这种潜在威胁,但其他区块链项目(例如Solana)已经在探索抗量子的加密解决方案。他们希望避免比特币可能面临的争夺。第2层网络和Sidechains也是对话的一部分,尽管它们的安全性最终取决于主要区块链的弹性。

The Contrarian View: Is Bitcoin Safe Enough?

逆势观点:比特币足够安全吗?

Not everyone's convinced that the sky is falling. Some Bitcoin advocates, like Adam Back of Blockstream, believe that the quantum threat is still a ways off – perhaps 20 years. Samson Mow of Jan3 suggests that Bitcoin's existing security infrastructure is robust enough for at least another decade. These experts suggest the upgrade is not as urgent as Yakovenko stated.

并不是每个人都相信天空正在下降。一些比特币的拥护者,例如Backstream的Adam,认为量子威胁仍然是一路,也许是20年。 JAN3的Samson Mow表明,至少十年来,比特币现有的安全基础架构足够强大。这些专家认为,升级不像Yakovenko所说的那样紧迫。

Personal View: The Need for Prudent Action

个人观点:审慎行动的需求

While complete consensus on the urgency of the situation is lacking, ignoring the potential risk is irresponsible. Yakovenko's warning acts as a reminder that technological progress can disrupt established systems. It's better to be proactive than reactive, especially when dealing with something as valuable as Bitcoin.

尽管缺乏对情况的紧迫性达成共识,但忽略潜在风险是不负责任的。 Yakovenko的警告提醒人们,技术进步可能会破坏已建立的系统。主动要比反应性更好,尤其是在处理像比特币这样有价值的东西时。

Looking Ahead

展望未来

Whether through protocol upgrades or the adoption of post-quantum cryptography, decisive steps will be needed to maintain trust and protect digital assets. The cryptocurrency landscape is evolving, and security must evolve alongside it. After all, who wants their Bitcoin disappearing into the quantum realm? Certainly not this New Yorker. Stay vigilant, folks!

无论是通过协议升级还是采用后量子加密术,都需要进行决定性的步骤,以维持信任和保护数字资产。加密货币景观正在发展,安全必须随之发展。毕竟,谁希望他们的比特币消失在量子领域中?当然不是这个纽约客。伙计们保持警惕!

原文来源:coinspeaker

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2026年06月28日 发表的其他文章