Solana社區的一部分批評了SIMD-228提案，理由是高集中化風險

該提案旨在通過從固定速率令牌排放到基於市場的模型將資產通貨膨脹率降低80％。

A section of the Solana community has criticized the SIMD-228 proposal for its high centralization risk. The proposal seeks to reduce the asset inflation rate by 80% by moving from a fixed-rate token emission to a market-based model.

Solana社區的一部分批評了SIMD-228提案的高集中化風險。該提案旨在通過從固定速率令牌排放到基於市場的模型將資產通貨膨脹率降低80％。

Over the past week, mixed views circulated on digital asset spaces. At the time of writing, proponents have secured the necessary quorum (71.85%) in favor.

在過去的一周中，混合視圖在數字資產空間上散發。在寫作時，支持者獲得了必要的法定人數（71.85％）。

Validators Lambast Possible Risks

驗證者lambast可能的風險

Crypto enthusiast Dave wrote on X that the move will favor larger validators over smaller players. He added that this will lead to high centralization and a scenario where the rich get richer.

加密愛好者戴夫（Dave）在X上寫道，此舉將偏愛較大的驗證者而不是較小的球員。他補充說，這將導致高集中化和富人變得更富有的情況。

Solana validator SolBlaze.org noted that SIMD-0228 threatens Solana’s decentralization and the wider ecosystem. While it sounds good in theory, presently, the fixed 15% inflation decrease will be taken to extreme levels. According to the validator, rewards will plunge up to 80% with users looking for better yield. This reduced stake affects network security and disproportionately affects small validators.

Solana驗證器Solblaze.org指出，SIMD-0228威脅了Solana的權力下放和更廣泛的生態系統。雖然從理論上講聽起來不錯，但目前，固定的15％通貨膨脹率下降將降低到極端水平。根據驗證者的說法，獎勵最多將跌至80％，而用戶尋求更好的收益。減少的股份會影響網絡安全性，並不成比例地影響小驗證器。

These network participants at 0% interest maintain servers and get block fees. Furthermore, Solana Foundation President Lily Liu described the proposal as half-baked, pointing to the benefits of a predictable capital market.

這些網絡參與者的利息為0％，維持服務器並獲得阻止費用。此外，索拉納基金會主席莉莉·劉（Lily Liu）將該提案描述為半生，指出了可預測的資本市場的好處。

Liu added that infrastructure remains the foundation of most networks and needs a certain level of stability.

劉補充說，基礎架構仍然是大多數網絡的基礎，並且需要一定程度的穩定性。

“What’s the greater risk and cost to our ecosystem: overpaying for security, or underinvesting in growth? On security: we were dogged for years as the centralized VC chain. We finally overcame that. But now we have 228 which is a VC proposal that centralizes the network! On growth: we’ve achieved impressive growth – and we need to continue to invest. Other ecosystems have noticed our ascent and are gearing up to compete,” Lui wrote.

“我們的生態系統的風險和成本更大：超額付費或投資不足的增長是多少？關於安全性：我們被釘在集中的VC連鎖店中多年。我們終於克服了這一點。但是現在我們有了228，這是一個集中網絡的風險投資提案！關於增長：我們已經實現了令人印象深刻的增長 - 我們需要繼續投資。其他生態系統已經註意到了我們的上升，並正在準備競爭。” Lui寫道。

Solana’s Co-founder Backs The Proposal

Solana的聯合創始人支持該提案

Solana’s co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko backed the proposal, allaying the decentralization concerns. In an X post, he explained that the cost of inflation hitting $1-$2 billion annually will spark losses for small validators and wealth managers. Another argument for the proposal is the incentive for participation to secure the network while inflation drops.

Solana的聯合創始人Anatoly Yakovenko支持了該提議，這表明了權力下放的問題。在X帖子中，他解釋說，通貨膨脹的成本每年達到1-2億美元，將為小型驗證者和財富管理人員帶來損失。該提案的另一個論點是，在通貨膨脹下降時，激勵參與網絡。

Per the release, higher inflation drives centralization. On the other hand, low inflation fuels Solana’s decentralized finance (DeFi) presence.

根據釋放，較高的通貨膨脹驅動了集中化。另一方面，低通脹為索拉納（Solana）的分散融資（DEFI）的存在提供。

“Additionally, a high staking rate can be viewed as unhealthy for new DeFi protocols, since it means the implied hurdle rate is the inflation cost. Lowering the “risk-free” inflation rate creates stimulative conditions and allows new protocols to grow.”

“此外，對於新的DEFI協議，可以將高的放電率視為不健康，因為這意味著隱含的障礙率是通貨膨脹成本。降低“無風險”通貨膨脹率會產生刺激條件並允許新方案增長。”