羅馬風暴，朝鮮黑客和檢察官：一個糾結的網絡

龍捲風現金開發商羅馬風暴的審判強調了起訴與加密相關的犯罪的複雜性，尤其是涉及國際證據和朝鮮黑客的犯罪。

The legal drama surrounding Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm continues to unfold, highlighting the challenges prosecutors face in the complex world of cryptocurrency and international law. With a jury seated and opening arguments underway, the case has taken a turn, revealing potential mishandling of key evidence and raising questions about the prosecution's approach. This isn't just about Storm; it's about the future of open-source software development and the long arm of the law in the digital age.

圍繞龍捲風現金開發商羅馬風暴的法律戲劇繼續展開，強調了檢察官在復雜的加密貨幣和國際法世界中面臨的挑戰。隨著陪審團的席位和開放的論點，此案轉彎了，揭示了潛在的關鍵證據不當，並提出了有關起訴方法的問題。這不僅僅是暴風雨；這是關於開源軟件開發的未來和數字時代法律的長遠部門的未來。

The Stormy Weather Surrounding Roman Storm

羅馬風暴周圍的暴風雨天氣

Roman Storm's trial in Manhattan is centered around allegations of conspiracy to commit money laundering, sanctions violations, and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business through Tornado Cash. The defense, however, is painting a different picture, accusing prosecutors of mishandling evidence and misrepresenting facts. At the heart of the dispute is a Telegram message referencing the $600 million Axie Infinity exploit. Prosecutors initially attributed the message to Storm's co-developer, Alexey Pertsev, but defense attorneys revealed it was actually written by a former CoinDesk reporter.

羅馬風暴在曼哈頓的審判圍繞著串謀違反洗錢，違反制裁和經營無牌的貨幣通過龍捲風現金傳輸業務的指控。然而，辯方正在繪畫不同的畫面，指責檢察官犯有不幸的證據和虛假陳述的事實。爭端的核心是一條電報消息，引用了6億美元的Axie Infinity漏洞。檢察官最初將信息歸因於Storm的共同開發人員Alexey Pertsev，但辯護律師透露，這實際上是由前Coindesk Reporter撰寫的。

A Case of Mistaken Identity?

身份錯誤的情況？

This misattribution isn't just a minor detail; it's a crucial point that the defense argues undermines the prosecution's case. According to court filings, Assistant U.S. Attorney Ben Arad referenced the message during a pretrial hearing, implying that it demonstrated the co-founders' awareness of wrongdoing. The defense characterized this as providing "false information" to the court and potentially the grand jury.

這種錯誤貢獻不僅僅是一個小細節。辯護人認為破壞起訴的案件是至關重要的一點。根據法院文件，美國助理檢察官本·阿拉德（Ben Arad）在審前聽證會上提到了這一信息，這意味著它表明了聯合創始人對不法行為的認識。辯方將其描述為向法院以及大陪審團提供“虛假信息”。

The defense argues that the government’s extraction contains multiple flaws, including missing author information for forwarded Telegram messages. The prosecutors provided a corrected version in December 2024, but defense attorneys argue this timeline raises serious questions about the government’s handling of evidence.

辯方認為，政府的提取包含多個缺陷，包括缺少用於轉發電報消息的作者信息。檢察官在2024年12月提供了更正的版本，但辯護律師認為，此時間表對政府處理證據提出了嚴重的疑問。

Echoes of Other Crypto Cases

其他加密案件的迴聲

Storm's case isn't an isolated incident. Similar authentication issues arose in the case of Russian crypto CEO Iurii Gugnin, highlighting a pattern of prosecutorial challenges in high-profile cryptocurrency cases involving international evidence gathering and complex digital communications. This begs the question: Are prosecutors equipped to handle the intricacies of the crypto world, or are they fumbling the ball?

Storm的案件不是孤立的事件。在俄羅斯加密首席執行官iurii Gugnin的情況下，出現了類似的身份驗證問題，突出了涉及國際證據收集和復雜數字通信的備受矚目的加密貨幣案件中的起訴挑戰模式。這就引出了一個問題：檢察官是否能夠處理加密世界的複雜性，還是他們在打球？

The Big Picture: Open Source vs. the Long Arm of the Law

大局：開源與法律長臂

Beyond the specific allegations against Storm, the case raises broader concerns about the criminalization of open-source software development. The Ethereum Foundation has pledged significant funds towards Storm's legal defense, signaling the importance of this case to the crypto community. Many believe that if Storm is convicted, it could set a dangerous precedent, chilling innovation and stifling the development of decentralized technologies.

除了針對風暴的具體指控之外，此案還對開源軟件開發的定罪提出了更廣泛的關注。以太坊基金會已承諾為風暴的法律辯護提供巨大的資金，這表明了這種案件對加密貨幣社區的重要性。許多人認為，如果風暴被定罪，它可能會設定危險的先例，令人震驚的創新並扼殺分散技術的發展。

While the connection to DPRK hackers isn't explicitly detailed in these articles, the backdrop of illicit transactions and sanctions violations hints at the potential involvement of state-sponsored actors using mixers like Tornado Cash to launder stolen funds. This adds another layer of complexity to an already intricate case.

儘管這些文章中沒有明確詳細介紹與朝鮮黑客的聯繫，但非法交易和製裁的背景違反了提示，暗示了國家贊助的參與者使用龍捲風現金等龍捲風搶劫基金的參與者的潛在參與。這為已經復雜的情況增加了另一層複雜性。

Final Thoughts

最後的想法

The Roman Storm trial is more than just a legal battle; it's a reflection of the growing pains of regulating the crypto industry. As the trial unfolds, it will be fascinating to see how the jury navigates the technical complexities and legal nuances. One thing is clear: this case will have a lasting impact on the future of crypto, open-source software, and the balance between innovation and regulation. Stay tuned, because this story is far from over!

羅馬風暴審判不僅僅是一場法律鬥爭。這反映了調節加密貨幣行業的日益嚴重的痛苦。隨著審判的展開，陪審團如何導航技術複雜性和法律細微差別將會令人著迷。很明顯：這種情況將對加密貨幣，開源軟件的未來以及創新與監管之間的平衡產生持久影響。請繼續關注，因為這個故事還遠遠沒有結束！