罗马风暴，朝鲜黑客和检察官：一个纠结的网络

龙卷风现金开发商罗马风暴的审判强调了起诉与加密相关的犯罪的复杂性，尤其是涉及国际证据和朝鲜黑客的犯罪。

The legal drama surrounding Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm continues to unfold, highlighting the challenges prosecutors face in the complex world of cryptocurrency and international law. With a jury seated and opening arguments underway, the case has taken a turn, revealing potential mishandling of key evidence and raising questions about the prosecution's approach. This isn't just about Storm; it's about the future of open-source software development and the long arm of the law in the digital age.

围绕龙卷风现金开发商罗马风暴的法律戏剧继续展开，强调了检察官在复杂的加密货币和国际法世界中面临的挑战。随着陪审团的席位和开放的论点，此案转弯了，揭示了潜在的关键证据不当，并提出了有关起诉方法的问题。这不仅仅是暴风雨；这是关于开源软件开发的未来和数字时代法律的长远部门的未来。

The Stormy Weather Surrounding Roman Storm

罗马风暴周围的暴风雨天气

Roman Storm's trial in Manhattan is centered around allegations of conspiracy to commit money laundering, sanctions violations, and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business through Tornado Cash. The defense, however, is painting a different picture, accusing prosecutors of mishandling evidence and misrepresenting facts. At the heart of the dispute is a Telegram message referencing the $600 million Axie Infinity exploit. Prosecutors initially attributed the message to Storm's co-developer, Alexey Pertsev, but defense attorneys revealed it was actually written by a former CoinDesk reporter.

罗马风暴在曼哈顿的审判围绕着串谋违反洗钱，违反制裁和经营无牌的货币通过龙卷风现金传输业务的指控。然而，辩方正在绘画不同的画面，指责检察官犯有不幸的证据和虚假陈述的事实。争端的核心是一条电报消息，引用了6亿美元的Axie Infinity漏洞。检察官最初将信息归因于Storm的共同开发人员Alexey Pertsev，但辩护律师透露，这实际上是由前Coindesk Reporter撰写的。

A Case of Mistaken Identity?

身份错误的情况？

This misattribution isn't just a minor detail; it's a crucial point that the defense argues undermines the prosecution's case. According to court filings, Assistant U.S. Attorney Ben Arad referenced the message during a pretrial hearing, implying that it demonstrated the co-founders' awareness of wrongdoing. The defense characterized this as providing "false information" to the court and potentially the grand jury.

这种错误贡献不仅仅是一个小细节。辩护人认为破坏起诉的案件是至关重要的一点。根据法院文件，美国助理检察官本·阿拉德（Ben Arad）在审前听证会上提到了这一信息，这意味着它表明了联合创始人对不法行为的认识。辩方将其描述为向法院以及大陪审团提供“虚假信息”。

The defense argues that the government’s extraction contains multiple flaws, including missing author information for forwarded Telegram messages. The prosecutors provided a corrected version in December 2024, but defense attorneys argue this timeline raises serious questions about the government’s handling of evidence.

辩方认为，政府的提取包含多个缺陷，包括缺少用于转发电报消息的作者信息。检察官在2024年12月提供了更正的版本，但辩护律师认为，此时间表对政府处理证据提出了严重的疑问。

Echoes of Other Crypto Cases

其他加密案件的回声

Storm's case isn't an isolated incident. Similar authentication issues arose in the case of Russian crypto CEO Iurii Gugnin, highlighting a pattern of prosecutorial challenges in high-profile cryptocurrency cases involving international evidence gathering and complex digital communications. This begs the question: Are prosecutors equipped to handle the intricacies of the crypto world, or are they fumbling the ball?

Storm的案件不是孤立的事件。在俄罗斯加密首席执行官iurii Gugnin的情况下，出现了类似的身份验证问题，突出了涉及国际证据收集和复杂数字通信的备受瞩目的加密货币案件中的起诉挑战模式。这就引出了一个问题：检察官是否能够处理加密世界的复杂性，还是他们在打球？

The Big Picture: Open Source vs. the Long Arm of the Law

大局：开源与法律长臂

Beyond the specific allegations against Storm, the case raises broader concerns about the criminalization of open-source software development. The Ethereum Foundation has pledged significant funds towards Storm's legal defense, signaling the importance of this case to the crypto community. Many believe that if Storm is convicted, it could set a dangerous precedent, chilling innovation and stifling the development of decentralized technologies.

除了针对风暴的具体指控之外，此案还对开源软件开发的定罪提出了更广泛的关注。以太坊基金会已承诺为风暴的法律辩护提供巨大的资金，这表明了这种案件对加密货币社区的重要性。许多人认为，如果风暴被定罪，它可能会设定危险的先例，令人震惊的创新并扼杀分散技术的发展。

While the connection to DPRK hackers isn't explicitly detailed in these articles, the backdrop of illicit transactions and sanctions violations hints at the potential involvement of state-sponsored actors using mixers like Tornado Cash to launder stolen funds. This adds another layer of complexity to an already intricate case.

尽管这些文章中没有明确详细介绍与朝鲜黑客的联系，但非法交易和制裁的背景违反了提示，暗示了国家赞助的参与者使用龙卷风现金等龙卷风抢劫基金的参与者的潜在参与。这为已经复杂的情况增加了另一层复杂性。

Final Thoughts

最后的想法

The Roman Storm trial is more than just a legal battle; it's a reflection of the growing pains of regulating the crypto industry. As the trial unfolds, it will be fascinating to see how the jury navigates the technical complexities and legal nuances. One thing is clear: this case will have a lasting impact on the future of crypto, open-source software, and the balance between innovation and regulation. Stay tuned, because this story is far from over!

罗马风暴审判不仅仅是一场法律斗争。这反映了调节加密货币行业的日益严重的痛苦。随着审判的展开，陪审团如何导航技术复杂性和法律细微差别将会令人着迷。很明显：这种情况将对加密货币，开源软件的未来以及创新与监管之间的平衡产生持久影响。请继续关注，因为这个故事还远远没有结束！