羅馬風暴的國防小組想知道美國司法部是否保留任何可能有助於龍捲風現金開發商案的信息。

在周五下旬提交的一封信中，辯護律師說，最近在另一個類似的案件中披露了最近的披露，這引起了人們的擔憂，即檢察官要么誤導了監督此案的法官，要么以其他方式扮演“快速又鬆散”。

Roman Storm's defense team is investigating if the U.S. Department of Justice is holding back any helpful information in the Tornado Cash developer's case.

羅馬風暴的國防小組正在調查美國司法部是否在龍捲風現金開發商的案件中阻止任何有用的信息。

In a letter filed late Friday, defense attorneys said recent disclosures in another, somewhat similar, case raised concerns that prosecutors either misled the judge or otherwise was playing "fast and loose."

在周五下旬提交的一封信中，辯護律師說，最近在另一個類似的案件中披露了最近的披露，提出了對檢察官誤導法官或以其他方式扮演“快速而寬鬆”的擔憂。

"The defense recently learned that the government has possessed exculpatory materials since August 2023 that go to the heart of a fundamental issue in this case: whether a noncustodial cryptocurrency mixer is a 'money transmitting business' for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1960," the filing said. "The government’s failure to produce those materials in the fall of 2023, when Roman Storm was indicted and first appeared in court, constitutes a Brady violation that has materially prejudiced his defense," even after the DOJ said it would drop a portion of its case against Storm.

該文件說：“辯方最近得知，自2023年8月以來，政府已經擁有脫口而出的材料，在這種情況下，這是一個基本問題的核心：對於1860年USC§§1960的目的，非客戶的加密貨幣混音器是否是'貨幣傳輸業務'。” “政府在2023年秋天未能生產這些材料，當時羅馬風暴被起訴並首次出庭，這構成了違法行為，這對他的辯護產生了重大損害，”即使在司法部表示將放棄一部分案件反對風暴。

Storm's team is referencing the DOJ's case against two developers of Samourai Wallet, another crypto mixer. In that case, defense attorneys said earlier this month that prosecutors delayed sharing that two Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) officials told the DOJ that the mixer did not look like a money transmitter.

Storm的團隊正在提及司法部對另一家加密貨幣台Samourai Wallet的開發商的案子。在這種情況下，辯護律師本月早些時候表示，檢察官推遲分享，兩名金融犯罪執法網絡（FINCEN）官員告訴美國司法部，調解員看起來不像是貨幣發射機。

Prosecutors denied the allegations in a court filing, saying their disclosures were timely and that the FinCEN officials' views were not formal guidance.

檢察官否認法院申請中的指控，稱他們的披露是及時的，而芬肯官員的觀點不是正式的指導。

The DOJ said the two cases are only "superficially similar," the defense filing said Friday.

司法部說，這兩個案件只是“表面上的相似”，國防文件週五說。

"But what the government characterizes as a superficial similarity is, in fact, the core feature that lies at the heart of the conflicting interpretations of FinCEN guidance and the scope of Section 1960:

“但是，政府將表現為膚淺的相似性是實際上是核心特徵，是Fincen指導的矛盾解釋的核心和1960年的範圍：

the noncustodial nature of both protocols," the filing said. "That users exercised sole control over their assets was a basis for Mr. Storm’s motion to dismiss and to

文件說。 “這兩種方案的非監護性質。