重新啟動觸發嗡嗡聲，但引發了信任問題

2025年5月17日，Arbusai在以太坊和BNB鏈中重新推出了其本地實用程序令牌。此舉是對其分散的人工智能平台進行更廣泛重組的一部分。

ArbusAI, a decentralized artificial intelligence platform, has relaunched its native utility token across Ethereum and BNB chains following a broader restructuring of the project. The move, which took place on May 17, 2025, has sparked concern among crypto developers and community members.

Arbusai是一個分散的人工智能平台，在對該項目進行了更廣泛的重組之後，重新推出了其整個以太坊和BNB鏈的本地實用程序令牌。此舉發生於2025年5月17日，引發了加密開發商和社區成員的關注。

ArbusAI is said to power autonomous AI agents governed by a distributed DAO voting system. However, within 48 hours of the relaunch, several developers flagged issues with the smart contract's ownership logic.

據說Arbusai是由分佈式DAO投票系統統治的自主AI代理。但是，在重新啟動後的48小時內，一些開發人員用智能合約的所有權邏輯標記了問題。

Community members in a Telegram channel dedicated to the project stated that the smart contract had several hardcoded admin wallets without time-locked transitions. A GitHub review showed inconsistent commit histories tied to DAO decision mechanics.

專門針對該項目的電報頻道中的社區成員指出，智能合約有幾個硬編碼的管理錢包，而沒有時間鎖定的過渡。 GitHub的一項審查顯示，與DAO決策機制相關的承諾歷史不一致。

"This could potentially allow backdoor control of future token minting or fund movement," one developer warned.

一位開發人員警告說：“這可能會允許對未來的造幣或資金運動的後門控制。”

Several community members also tagged CertiK and Hacken in posts on X, formerly Twitter, to conduct an independent audit of the project. The ArbusAI team responded with a post on May 18 stating that a full audit "is underway." No formal documents or confirmations from either auditing firm have yet been released.

幾個社區成員還在X（以前是Twitter）上的帖子中標記了Certik和Hacken，以對該項目進行獨立的審核。 Arbusai團隊在5月18日的帖子中做出了回應，稱全面的審計“正在進行”。尚未發布任何一家審計公司的正式文件或確認。

Investors also raised concerns over transparency with the updated DAO structure. The DAO vote logs released post-relaunch showed that over 60% of votes were cast by 12 wallets. These wallets were pre-funded during the private round, raising fears of centralized influence.

投資者還對更新的DAO結構提出了對透明度的擔憂。發行後發布的DAO投票日誌顯示，超過60％的票是由12個錢包投擲的。這些錢包是在私人一輪中預先資助的，這引起了人們對集中影響的擔憂。

Additionally, the DAO dashboard showed no clear delegation mechanisms or accountability tracking tools. According to the tokenomics data released in the whitepaper, which was reportedly altered two days before relaunch, 35% of the total token supply was initially allocated for a community reserve fund. However, this percentage was later reduced to 20% without any disclosure.

此外，DAO儀表板沒有顯示明確的委託機製或問責制跟踪工具。根據據報導，白皮書中發布的標記數據在重新啟動前兩天發生了更改，最初將代幣供應總額的35％分配給了一個社區儲備基金。但是，此百分比後來降至20％，而沒有任何披露。

This change directly affects both the staking rewards and the AI training fund allocation, sparking outrage among community members. Prominent DAO researchers also highlighted that this behavior violates standard decentralized governance norms.

這一變化直接影響了積分獎勵和AI培訓基金的分配，這引起了社區成員的憤怒。 DAO著名的研究人員還強調，這種行為違反了標準的分散治理規範。

"If you can't trace a vote or challenge it, it's not a DAO—it's just a wrapper," one analyst stated in a recent post.

一位分析師在最近的一篇文章中說：“如果您不能追踪投票或挑戰投票，那不是DAO，它只是包裝紙。”

Despite an initial spike in trading volume following the relaunch, the ArbusAI token dropped 28% within 24 hours. Multiple users also reported encountering issues with staking through the Web3 dashboard, possibly due to backend errors.

儘管重新啟動後交易量最初激增，但Arbusai代幣在24小時內下降了28％。多個用戶還報告了遇到通過Web3儀表板算的問題，這可能是由於後端錯誤所致。

The ArbusAI controversy underscores the growing sensitivity among investors towards transparency in decentralized AI platforms. As Web3 moves toward agent-led economies, governance in AI-linked crypto systems is coming under even greater scrutiny.

Arbusai的爭議強調了投資者對分散AI平台透明度的敏感性的日益敏感性。隨著Web3朝著代理領導的經濟體的發展，AI鏈接加密系統中的治理受到了更大的審查。