重新启动触发嗡嗡声，但引发了信任问题

2025年5月17日，Arbusai在以太坊和BNB链中重新推出了其本地实用程序令牌。此举是对其分散的人工智能平台进行更广泛重组的一部分。

ArbusAI, a decentralized artificial intelligence platform, has relaunched its native utility token across Ethereum and BNB chains following a broader restructuring of the project. The move, which took place on May 17, 2025, has sparked concern among crypto developers and community members.

Arbusai是一个分散的人工智能平台，在对该项目进行了更广泛的重组之后，重新推出了其整个以太坊和BNB链的本地实用程序令牌。此举发生于2025年5月17日，引发了加密开发商和社区成员的关注。

ArbusAI is said to power autonomous AI agents governed by a distributed DAO voting system. However, within 48 hours of the relaunch, several developers flagged issues with the smart contract's ownership logic.

据说Arbusai是由分布式DAO投票系统统治的自主AI代理。但是，在重新启动后的48小时内，一些开发人员用智能合约的所有权逻辑标记了问题。

Community members in a Telegram channel dedicated to the project stated that the smart contract had several hardcoded admin wallets without time-locked transitions. A GitHub review showed inconsistent commit histories tied to DAO decision mechanics.

专门针对该项目的电报频道中的社区成员指出，智能合约有几个硬编码的管理钱包，而没有时间锁定的过渡。 GitHub的一项审查显示，与DAO决策机制相关的承诺历史不一致。

"This could potentially allow backdoor control of future token minting or fund movement," one developer warned.

一位开发人员警告说：“这可能会允许对未来的造币或资金运动的后门控制。”

Several community members also tagged CertiK and Hacken in posts on X, formerly Twitter, to conduct an independent audit of the project. The ArbusAI team responded with a post on May 18 stating that a full audit "is underway." No formal documents or confirmations from either auditing firm have yet been released.

几个社区成员还在X（以前是Twitter）上的帖子中标记了Certik和Hacken，以对该项目进行独立的审核。 Arbusai团队在5月18日的帖子中做出了回应，称全面的审计“正在进行”。尚未发布任何一家审计公司的正式文件或确认。

Investors also raised concerns over transparency with the updated DAO structure. The DAO vote logs released post-relaunch showed that over 60% of votes were cast by 12 wallets. These wallets were pre-funded during the private round, raising fears of centralized influence.

投资者还对更新的DAO结构提出了对透明度的担忧。发行后发布的DAO投票日志显示，超过60％的票是由12个钱包投掷的。这些钱包是在私人一轮中预先资助的，这引起了人们对集中影响的担忧。

Additionally, the DAO dashboard showed no clear delegation mechanisms or accountability tracking tools. According to the tokenomics data released in the whitepaper, which was reportedly altered two days before relaunch, 35% of the total token supply was initially allocated for a community reserve fund. However, this percentage was later reduced to 20% without any disclosure.

此外，DAO仪表板没有显示明确的委托机制或问责制跟踪工具。根据据报道，白皮书中发布的标记数据在重新启动前两天发生了更改，最初将代币供应总额的35％分配给了一个社区储备基金。但是，此百分比后来降至20％，而没有任何披露。

This change directly affects both the staking rewards and the AI training fund allocation, sparking outrage among community members. Prominent DAO researchers also highlighted that this behavior violates standard decentralized governance norms.

这一变化直接影响了积分奖励和AI培训基金的分配，这引起了社区成员的愤怒。 DAO著名的研究人员还强调，这种行为违反了标准的分散治理规范。

"If you can't trace a vote or challenge it, it's not a DAO—it's just a wrapper," one analyst stated in a recent post.

一位分析师在最近的一篇文章中说：“如果您不能追踪投票或挑战投票，那不是DAO，它只是包装纸。”

Despite an initial spike in trading volume following the relaunch, the ArbusAI token dropped 28% within 24 hours. Multiple users also reported encountering issues with staking through the Web3 dashboard, possibly due to backend errors.

尽管重新启动后交易量最初激增，但Arbusai代币在24小时内下降了28％。多个用户还报告了遇到通过Web3仪表板算的问题，这可能是由于后端错误所致。

The ArbusAI controversy underscores the growing sensitivity among investors towards transparency in decentralized AI platforms. As Web3 moves toward agent-led economies, governance in AI-linked crypto systems is coming under even greater scrutiny.

Arbusai的争议强调了投资者对分散AI平台透明度的敏感性的日益敏感性。随着Web3朝着代理领导的经济体的发展，AI链接加密系统中的治理受到了更大的审查。