SEC 拒絕 Coinbase 加密監管提案，捍衛現有框架

美國證券交易委員會提交了一份簡報，反對 Coinbase 為加密貨幣創建新監管框架的請願書，認為現有法規已經足夠。 SEC 堅稱其拒絕 Coinbase 的請願書是合理的，因為它正在採取措施解決現有規則對加密資產的適用問題。該簡報駁回了Coinbase 的說法，即法院在將現有法律適用於數位資產案件方面存在困難，並堅稱在沒有國會授權或健康和安全威脅的情況下，該機構沒有義務花時間制定加密資產規則。

SEC Denies Coinbase's Petition for New Crypto Regulatory Framework

SEC 拒絕 Coinbase 對新加密貨幣監管框架的請願

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a formal response to Coinbase's request to develop a new regulatory framework for crypto assets, arguing that its denial of the petition was both reasonable and well-reasoned. The SEC's brief, submitted to the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals, vehemently denies Coinbase's claims that the current regulatory landscape for digital assets is unworkable and necessitates a comprehensive overhaul.

美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 對 Coinbase 制定新的加密資產監管框架的請求做出了正式回應，稱其拒絕該請願既合理又合理。 SEC 在提交給美國第三巡迴上訴法院的簡報中強烈否認了 Coinbase 的說法，即當前的數位資產監管環境行不通，需要全面改革。

The SEC asserts that Coinbase's characterization of existing regulations as "unworkable" is unfounded, pointing to ongoing initiatives and proposed rules that address the application of established frameworks to crypto asset securities. The brief explicitly refutes Coinbase's argument that the courts struggle with existing law in digital asset cases, citing successful enforcement actions and judicial assessments that contradict Coinbase's claims.

SEC 聲稱，Coinbase 將現有法規描述為「不可行」是沒有根據的，並指出正在採取的舉措和擬議的規則，旨在解決現有框架在加密資產證券中的應用問題。該簡報明確反駁了 Coinbase 的論點，即法院在數位資產案件中與現行法律作鬥爭，並引用了與 Coinbase 的主張相矛盾的成功執法行動和司法評估。

Furthermore, the SEC dismisses Coinbase's contention that the agency should dedicate significant resources to crypto asset rulemaking, arguing that such a mandate requires congressional direction or a threat to human health and safety, neither of which is present in this case. The brief emphasizes that courts rarely overturn agency denials of rulemaking petitions in such circumstances.

此外，SEC 駁回了 Coinbase 的觀點，即該機構應該投入大量資源來製定加密資產規則，認為這樣的授權需要國會的指導或對人類健康和安全的威脅，而這兩者在本案中都不存在。簡報強調，在這種情況下，法院很少推翻機構拒絕規則制定請願書的決定。

In response to the SEC's filing, Coinbase's top lawyer, Paul Grewal, released a statement criticizing the agency's stance. Grewal accused the SEC of refusing to provide adequate explanation for its decision and dismissed its assertions that current regulations are sufficient. He expressed confidence that the court would recognize the flaws in the SEC's arguments.

作為對 SEC 提交文件的回應，Coinbase 的首席律師 Paul Grewal 發表了一份聲明，批評該機構的立場。 Grewal 指責 SEC 拒絕為其決定提供充分的解釋，並駁回了其關於現行法規已足夠的說法。他表示相信法院會認識到 SEC 論點中的缺陷。

The SEC's denial of Coinbase's petition underscores the agency's continued reluctance to create a dedicated regulatory framework for crypto assets. The SEC has consistently maintained that existing regulations are adaptable enough to address the unique challenges posed by digital assets. However, Coinbase and other industry stakeholders argue that a more tailored approach is necessary to foster innovation and provide clarity in the crypto market.

美國證券交易委員會拒絕 Coinbase 的請願書凸顯了該機構仍然不願為加密資產創建專門的監管框架。美國證券交易委員會始終認為，現有法規足以應對數位資產帶來的獨特挑戰。然而，Coinbase 和其他行業利益相關者認為，有必要採取更有針對性的方法來促進創新並提高加密市場的透明度。

As the legal battle over crypto regulation continues, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in this case will have significant implications for the future of digital asset regulation in the United States.

隨著加密貨幣監管的法律鬥爭仍在繼續，美國第三巡迴上訴法院在此案中的判決將對美國數位資產監管的未來產生重大影響。