美國總統唐納德·特朗普（Donald Trump）在他的$特朗普模因硬幣中為頂級投資者提供獨家晚宴，引發了爭議的危險

2025年5月24日 - （北京）美國總統唐納德·特朗普（Donald Trump）在他的$ trump Meme Coin中為頂級投資者提供獨家晚宴，引發了爭議的大火

The Trump administration’s melding of political office with private enterprise has come under harsh scrutiny following a lavish dinner hosted by U.S. President Donald Trump for top investors in his $TRUMP meme coin.

在美國總統唐納德·特朗普（Donald Trump）為高級投資者舉辦的豪華晚餐之後，特朗普政府與私營企業的政治辦公室與私營企業的融合受到了嚴厲的審查。

The event, held on the 24th of May at the Trump National Golf Club in Virginia, was billed as a gathering of the “most exclusive” crypto elite, but it also saw the value of Trump’s token plummet by 16% within hours, even as protesters outside decried the affair as “corruption embodied.”

該活動於5月24日在弗吉尼亞州的特朗普國家高爾夫俱樂部舉行，被稱為“最獨特的”加密精英的聚會，但它也看到特朗普的代幣在數小時內下降了16％的價值，即使在外面的抗議者譴責戀情被認為是“腐敗體現”的情況下。

The dinner, attended by 220 investors who collectively spent $148 million on $TRUMP tokens, is part of a broader move by the Trump administration to integrate cryptocurrency into U.S. governance. However, critics view these ventures as a blatant misuse of presidential authority for personal financial gain.

這次晚宴由220名投資者參加，共同花了1.48億美元在特朗普代幣上，這是特朗普政府採取更廣泛舉動的一部分，以將加密貨幣納入美國治理。但是，批評家認為這些冒險是對個人經濟利益的公然濫用總統權力。

Among the attendees was crypto tycoon Justin Sun, known for his past as a fugitive from U.S. legal scrutiny. Formerly evading American jurisdiction due to SEC fraud charges and a Justice Department financial crimes investigation, Sun now emerges as the primary holder of Trump’s meme coin, investing $23 million for VIP access to the president.

參加者中有加密大亨賈斯汀·孫（Justin Sun），他的過去是我們法律審查的逃犯。 Sun以前逃避了由於SEC欺詐指控和司法部的金融犯罪調查而導致的美國管轄權，Sun現在是特朗普的Meme Coin的主要持有人，投資了2300萬美元，用於將VIP訪問總統。

Sun’s blockchain platform, Tron, previously under fire from U.S. authorities and the United Nations for its association with unlawful financial practices, has once again come under scrutiny. A confidential 2023 Treasury Department document highlighted the increasing utilisation of Tron by “unlawful entities,” with over $26 billion in illicit transactions linked to the network last year.

Sun的區塊鏈平台Tron以前曾在美國當局和聯合國與非法財務實踐有關的聯合國遭到抨擊，並再次受到審查。一份機密的2023財政部文件強調了“非法實體”對TRON的利用日益增加，去年與該網絡有關的非法交易超過260億美元。

Despite Sun’s refutations and his efforts with entities like TRM Labs to combat illicit crypto activities, his participation in Trump’s initiatives — including a $75 million share in the Trump-affiliated World Liberty Financial — has sparked bipartisan disapproval.

儘管Sun的駁斥以及他在TRM Labs等實體打擊非法加密活動中的努力，但他參與特朗普的舉措（包括在特朗普隸屬的世界自由財務中佔有7500萬美元的股份）引發了兩黨的反對。

Representative Glenn Ivey (D-Md.) expressed concerns during a congressional session, stating, “This frankly smells very bad,” and suggesting that the SEC’s decision to halt its proceedings against Sun may hint at political partiality.

代表格倫·艾維（Glenn Ivey）（D-Md。）在國會會議上表示關注，並指出：“坦率地聞起來很臭”，並暗示SEC決定停止對太陽的訴訟程序的決定可能暗示政治上的偏見。

The dinner’s secrecy further fuels allegations of corruption. Attendees gained entry through a pseudo-auction based on $TRUMP holdings, with the top 25 investors promised a “private VIP reception” and tour. Yet the identities of most remain shrouded behind pseudonymous blockchain wallets, such as “MeCo” and “REKT,” obscuring potential foreign influence.

晚餐的保密性進一步促進了關於腐敗的指控。與會者通過以$特朗普的持股為基礎的偽拍賣獲得了進入，前25名投資者承諾將舉行“私人VIP接待”和巡迴演出。然而，大多數人的身份仍然籠罩在偽義區塊鏈錢包後面，例如“ Meco”和“ Rekt”，掩蓋了潛在的外國影響力。

A Bloomberg analysis revealed that over half of the top 220 wallets were linked to offshore exchanges, circumventing U.S. regulatory oversight. This anonymity, coupled with the Trump Organisation’s control of 80% of the token’s supply, paints a troubling portrait of a presidency enmeshed in speculative finance.

彭博社的一項分析表明，超過一半的前220個錢包與離岸交易所有關，從而規避了美國的監管監督。這種匿名性，再加上特朗普組織對80％的代幣供應的控制，這描繪了一張令人不安的肖像，即在投機融資中陷入困境。

Central to the controversy is Trump’s alleged misuse of the presidential seal during his address—a potential federal violation prohibiting its use to imply government endorsement. While the White House insists Trump attended “in his personal capacity,” critics argue the event’s proximity to power undermines public trust.

爭議的核心是特朗普在講話期間涉嫌濫用總統印章，這是一個潛在的聯邦違規行為，禁止其暗示政府認可。雖然白宮堅持特朗普“以個人身份”參加，但批評家認為該事件的距離迫使他們削弱了公眾的信任。

“There’s a ‘For Sale’ sign on the White House lawn,” declared Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), flanked by protesters bearing signs like “Crypto Corruption” and “Trump is a Traitor.”

參議員傑夫·默克利（Jeff Merkley）宣稱：“白宮草坪上有一個'待售'標誌。

The market’s response was immediate and stark. After reaching a peak of $74.34 in January, the TRUMP token plummeted to $14.44 following the dinner, wiping out significant value and revealing the vulnerability of politically linked cryptocurrencies.

市場的反應是直接而鮮明的。在一月份達到74.34美元的高峰之後，特朗普象徵在晚餐後跌至14.44美元，消除了巨大的價值，並揭示了政治上聯繫的加密貨幣的脆弱性。

Investors such as Nicholas Pinto, who criticised the event’s inadequate security and disappointing cuisine, highlighted the disparity between the grandeur of the gala—where even Richard Mille watches were commonplace—and its lack of substance.

尼古拉斯·平托（Nicholas Pinto）等投資者批評了該活動的安全性不足和令人失望的美食，強調了盛大盛大的盛大盛宴之間的差異，即使是理查德·米勒（Richard Mille）手錶也很普遍，而且缺乏實質性。

Pinto noted, “Many individuals had already divested from the coin,” adding, “They were checking their phones during the dinner to monitor any price fluctuations.”

Pinto指出，“許多人已經從硬幣中脫離了，”他補充說：“他們在晚餐期間檢查了手機，以監視任何價格波動。”

This spectacle arrives at a pivotal juncture for U.S. crypto policy. The Senate’s GENIUS Act, a bipartisan stablecoin regulation bill, now faces disruption amid amendments targeting Trump’s ventures, including a Democratic push to bar presidents from profiting off crypto while in office.

這個奇觀到了美國加密政策的關鍵點。參議院的天才法案是兩黨制定法規法案，現在在針對特朗普的冒險事業的修正案中面臨中斷，包括民主黨迫使禁止總統在任職期間獲得加密貨幣的利潤。

Major banks like JPMorgan and Bank of America, meanwhile, eye a unified digital dollar to counter Tether’s global dominance—a vision imperiled by legislative stagnation.

與此同時，摩根大通和美國銀行等主要銀行是一筆統一的數字美元，以應對特ether的全球統治地位，這是立法停滯的願景。

In contrast, Beijing and Hong Kong offer a study in regulatory prudence. Hong Kong’s recent stablecoin legislation, mandating stringent licensing and oversight, reflects a deliberate approach to balancing innovation with accountability.

相比之下，北京和香港為監管審慎提供了一項研究。香港最近的Stablecoin立法強制執行嚴格的許可和監督，反映了一種故意平衡創新與問責制的方法。

Justin Sun himself acknowledged the ripple effect of U.S. policy shifts, suggesting Trump’s embrace of crypto could spur similar recalibrations in Asia.

賈斯汀·孫本人承認了美國政策轉變的連鎖反應，這表明特朗普對加密貨幣的擁抱可能刺激亞洲的類似重新校準。

“If one side sees the other making efforts, it will definitely think about following up,” he remarked, alluding to the strategic rivalry between China and the U.S.

他說：“如果一方看到另一方的努力，那肯定會考慮跟進。”他暗示了中國與美國之間的戰略競爭

Yet the dinner’s fallout transcends mere policy debate. It epitomises a broader erosion of ethical guardrails in Western governance, where

然而，晚餐的後果超越了政策辯論。它代表了西方治理中對道德護欄的更廣泛侵蝕，