律師事務所Burwick已建議Metaplex重新審視其費用掃描系統，或面對提起訴訟的可能性。

Burwick Law表示，如果Metaplex不改變其無人認領的NFT價值從調整大小升級到DAO國庫的計劃，則可能面臨訴訟。

Law firm Burwick has advised Metaplex to revisit its fee sweep system or else face the possibility of drawn-out litigation.

律師事務所Burwick已建議Metaplex重新審視其費用掃描系統，否則面臨著提起訴訟的可能性。

In a post shared on X, formerly Twitter, on April 22, members of the legal team at crypto-focused law firm Burwick Law stated that Metaplex risks facing a lawsuit if it does not change its plan to move unclaimed NFT value from the resize upgrade to its DAO treasury instead of refunding it to NFT holders.

在4月22日在X（以前是Twitter）上的一篇文章中，以加密貨幣為重點的律師事務所的法律團隊的法律團隊的成員Burwick Law表示，如果不改變其計劃將無人認領的NFT價值從調整大小升級轉移到其DAO國庫中，而不是將其退還給NFT持有人。

Earlier this year, NFT protocol Metaplex discovered a technique to reduce the onchain storage requirements for certain NFTs. By resizing their NFTs, holders on the Solana (SOL) network can access a small amount of SOL.

今年早些時候，NFT協議Metaplex發現了一種減少某些NFT的鏈存儲要求的技術。通過調整其NFT，Solana（Sol）網絡上的持有人可以訪問少量的SOL。

In October, Metaplex announced that Metaplex Token Metadata (TM) NFT holders could complete a “resize optimization” for all TM accounts by April 25. Any unclaimed SOL by the deadline will be transferred to the Metaplex DAO, although the firm did not specify how these funds will be used.

10月，Metaplex宣布，Metaplex令牌元數據（TM）NFT持有人可以在4月25日之前完成對所有TM帳戶的“大小優化”。截止日期的任何無人認領的SOL都將轉移到Metaplex DAO，儘管該公司未指定如何使用這些資金。

However, Burwick criticized Metaplex’s plan to direct unclaimed funds to its DAO treasury rather than returning them to NFT holders.

但是，伯維克批評了Metaplex的計劃，將無人認領的資金指導到其DAO財政部，而不是將其歸還NFT持有人。

“Many minters never received clear notice that these lamports could be swept, let alone diverted to a treasury they do not control,” Burwick said in an open letter to Metaplex and the broader Solana community.

伯威克在致Metaplex和更廣泛的Solana社區的一封公開信中說：“許多Minters從未清楚地註意到這些燈具可以被掃除，更不用說轉移到他們無法控制的財政部。”

According to Burwick, over 54,000 SOL tokens are at risk, while on April 25, at least 7,043 SOL has been claimed, based on figures from Metaplex’s website. With current market rates, over $6.5 million remains unclaimed.

根據伯威克的說法，根據Metaplex網站的數據，超過54,000個SOL代幣處於危險之中，而4月25日，至少有7,043 SOL。由於當前的市場利率，超過650萬美元的貨幣仍然無人認領。

Several NFT collectors that Burwick represents have expressed “deep concerns” over the plan, and the firm also noted that the plan erodes trust and goes against the spirit of crypto.

Burwick代表的幾位NFT收藏家對該計劃表達了“深切關注”，該公司還指出，該計劃侵蝕了信任，並違背了加密精神。

“‘Code is law’ only works when the rules are clear and immutable. If a protocol can rewrite yesterday’s deal tomorrow, the promise of decentralised permanence rings hollow.”

“'代碼是法律'僅在規則清晰且不可變時起作用。如果一項協議可以明天重寫昨天的交易，那麼分散的永久性戒指的承諾是空心的。”

If the court finds the sweep to be unjust enrichment or in violation of consumer protection laws, victims could receive restitution, Burwick warned.

伯威克警告說，如果法院認為掃蕩是不公正的，或者違反了消費者保護法，受害者可能會恢復原狀。

As of press time, no response from Metaplex to Burwick’s post has been shared.

截至發稿時，Metaplex對Burwick的帖子沒有任何回應。

The crypto lawyers suggest that the unclaimed SOL could be used by the DAO for voting on airdrops, granting funds to ecosystem builders, or backing other initiatives.

加密律師建議，DAO可以將無人認領的SOL用於對氣水進行投票，向生態系統建築商授予資金或支持其他計劃。

Instead, they advise Metaplex to put a hold on the plan, refund the rent directly to current NFT holders, and retain a “modest” 10% for maintaining the network.

取而代之的是，他們建議Metaplex持有該計劃，將租金直接退還給當前的NFT持有人，並保留“適度” 10％以維護網絡。

“A 90 / 10 split protects users, preserves DAO funding, and proves that the Solana ecosystem can self‑regulate—without a courtroom.”

“ 90/10分裂可以保護用戶，保留DAO資金，並證明Solana生態系統可以自我調節，而沒有法庭。”

DeFi protocols have encountered similar issues and reached a solution through this method, according to Burwick.

據Burwick稱，Defi協議遇到了類似的問題，並通過此方法達到了解決方案。

The lawyers add that this provides ample time for Metaplex to carry out this strategy and avoid litigation that could freeze funds.

律師補充說，這為Metaplex提供了足夠的時間來執行此策略，並避免訴訟可以凍結資金。

“The ball is in the DAO’s court. Let’s show the world that Web3 corrects its own course and lives up to its founding principles of transparency, immutability, and fair dealing.”

“球在道的法庭上。讓我們向世界展示Web3糾正了自己的路線，並符合其透明，不變性和公平交易的基礎原則。”