Hawk Tuah 女孩團隊因其 Memecoin 計畫而被起訴

這是近幾個月來最離奇的加密貨幣故事之一，Hawk Tuah 女孩團隊因其 memecoin 專案而被起訴。

Haliey Welch's foray into the world of memecoins has taken an unexpected turn, with her team being hit with a lawsuit over the venture.

哈莉·韋爾奇 (Haliey Welch) 進軍迷因幣世界的舉動發生了意想不到的轉變，她的團隊因該合資企業遭到了訴訟。

The legal action stems from the launch of $HAWK, a Solana-based memecoin that was promoted by Welch and her team.

這項法律訴訟源於 $HAWK 的推出，這是由 Welch 及其團隊推廣的基於 Solana 的 memecoin。

According to a document filed to court on Wednesday, the lawsuit 'arises from the unlawful promotion and sale of the Hawk Tuah cryptocurrency memecoin, known as the "$HAWK" token (the "Token" or "$HAWK"), which Defendants offered and sold to the public without proper registration'.

根據週三提交給法庭的一份文件，該訴訟“源於非法推廣和銷售Hawk Tuah 加密貨幣memecoin，即所謂的“$HAWK”代幣（“Token”或“$HAWK”），被告提供了該代幣並在未經適當註冊的情況下向公眾出售」。

Among those named in the lawsuit are Tuah The Moon Foundation, which oversaw the memecoin's finances, OverHere Ltd, which created the coin, and Clinton So, an executive at OverHere.

訴訟中提到的人士包括負責監督 memecoin 財務的 Tuah The Moon 基金會、創建該貨幣的 OverHere Ltd 以及 OverHere 的高管 Clinton So。

The lawsuit also names Alex Larson Schultz, the coin's promoter, as a defendant.

該訴訟還將代幣發起人亞歷克斯·拉爾森·舒爾茨 (Alex Larson Schultz) 列為被告。

However, Welch herself was not named in the complaint, which alleges that the defendants used her social media following to market the coin to 'emphasize community engagement, inclusivity, and bridge mainstream culture with the cryptocurrency world'.

然而，起訴書中沒有提到韋爾奇本人的名字，指控被告利用她的社群媒體粉絲來行銷該代幣，以「強調社區參與、包容性，並將主流文化與加密貨幣世界聯繫起來」。

The lawsuit comes after Welch's team faced accusations of a 'rug pull' - a term used to describe a scenario where cryptocurrency developers quickly sell their tokens and leave investors with worthless coins.

在這起訴訟之前，韋爾奇的團隊面臨「地毯拉動」的指控，該術語用於描述加密貨幣開發商迅速出售其代幣並給投資者留下毫無價值的代幣的情況。

Welch's team has denied these accusations, with the Solana Girl herself taking to Twitter to address the controversy.

韋爾奇的團隊否認了這些指控，索拉納女孩本人也在推特上回應了這場爭議。

"Hawkanomics: Team hasn’t sold one token and not 1 KOL was given 1 free token," she tweeted in a copy and pasted message.

「Hawkanomics：團隊尚未出售任何代幣，也沒有向 1 位 KOL 提供 1 個免費代幣，」她在推文中複製並貼上了訊息。

"We tried to stop snipers as best we could through high fee’s in the start of launch on @MeteoraAG. Fee’s have now been dropped."

“在 @MeteoraAG 上發布之初，我們試圖通過高額費用來盡最大努力阻止狙擊手。現在費用已降低。”

But readers added their own context to the tweet claiming her team had sold.

但讀者在推文中添加了自己的背景，聲稱她的團隊已經出售。

It read: "The 'team' and insiders have actually been selling their token since launch.

它寫道：「自推出以來，『團隊』和內部人士實際上一直在出售他們的代幣。

"A majority have never purchased anything and have only sold the tokens they were given.

「大多數人從未購買過任何東西，只出售了他們收到的代幣。

"Haliey is lying and will likely have to 'talk tuah' judge about this."

“哈利在撒謊，很可能不得不就此事與法官‘交談’。”

Following the launch of $HAWK, its value reportedly plummeted from as much as $490 million to just $41 million. Some news outlets reckoned it lost more than 95 percent of its value.

據報道，$HAWK 推出後，價值從 4.9 億美元暴跌至 4,100 萬美元。一些新聞媒體估計它損失了超過 95% 的價值。

After the dust settled, OverHere - the official platform for Welch's $HAWK token - issued a statement about the matter.

塵埃落定後，韋爾奇$HAWK代幣的官方平台OverHere就此事發表了一份聲明。

The team revealed the so-called 'truth' about what happened.

該團隊揭露了所發生事件的所謂「真相」。

On the memecoin, they said: "Hailey Welch—a literal meme—launching a meme coin felt like synchronicity.

關於迷因幣，他們說：「海莉·韋爾奇（Hailey Welch）——一個真正的迷因——推出迷因幣感覺就像是同步性的。

"Our goal was simple: bring Web2 fans into Web3 seamlessly. A way to bring Web2 into crypto through culture, not just speculation."

“我們的目標很簡單：將 Web2 粉絲無縫帶入 Web3。透過文化而不僅僅是投機將 Web2 帶入加密貨幣的一種方式。”

As to how things unravelled, overHere says that 'community sentiment shifted'.

至於事情是如何解決的，overHere 表示「社區情緒改變了」。

"As desperation kicked in, participation conditions were progressively watered down," the team said.

團隊表示：“隨著絕望的到來，參與條件逐漸被淡化。”

"What started with plans for a lock-up eventually ended with none."

「一開始的鎖定計劃最終以無果而終。”

It went on to place blame on an individual who goes by Doc Hollywood, who apparently 'controlled all token decisions, fees, treasury'.

它接著將責任歸咎於一個被稱為「好萊塢博士」的人，他顯然「控制了所有像徵性的決定、費用和財務」。

Then, overHere further insisted that it made zero revenue from the whole debacle and that Doc Hollywood allegedly charged 15 percent trading fees.

然後，overHere 進一步堅稱，它從整個災難中獲得的收入為零，據稱 Doc Hollywood 收取 15% 的交易費。

These allegations were denied by Alexander Larson Shultz, the team member nicknamed 'Doc Hollywood', as reported by IBT.

據 IBT 報道，綽號“好萊塢醫生”的團隊成員亞歷山大·拉爾森·舒爾茨否認了這些指控。