市值: $3.4448T 2.380%
體積(24小時): $175.5868B 63.410%
  • 市值: $3.4448T 2.380%
  • 體積(24小時): $175.5868B 63.410%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $3.4448T 2.380%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$110548.668118 USD

3.40%

ethereum
ethereum

$2595.132839 USD

2.29%

tether
tether

$0.999904 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.404516 USD

2.08%

bnb
bnb

$683.453521 USD

4.95%

solana
solana

$174.496453 USD

3.36%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999818 USD

0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.240522 USD

5.15%

cardano
cardano

$0.782615 USD

5.07%

tron
tron

$0.270166 USD

0.16%

sui
sui

$3.992173 USD

4.12%

chainlink
chainlink

$16.279393 USD

3.29%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$30.024618 USD

14.35%

avalanche
avalanche

$23.534329 USD

4.89%

stellar
stellar

$0.296995 USD

3.46%

加密貨幣新聞文章

如果金融體係不是通過燃燒電力而是通過獎勵良好行為來運行自己怎麼辦?那就是賭博的承諾

2025/05/22 21:30

這就是賭注的希望,這種機制通過將用戶變成網絡運營商來為許多現代區塊鏈提供動力。

如果金融體係不是通過燃燒電力而是通過獎勵良好行為來運行自己怎麼辦?那就是賭博的承諾

What if financial systems could run themselves not by burning electricity, but by rewarding good behavior? The promise of financial systems that are both decentralized and self-sufficient has been a subject of fascination for economists and technologists alike.

如果金融系統可以通過燃燒電力而是通過獎勵良好行為來運行自己怎麼辦?金融體系的承諾既是分散又是自給自足的,這對經濟學家和技術人員都著迷。

As crypto technology advances, we're beginning to see the emergence of such systems, powered by novel mechanisms like staking. This week on The Clear Crypto Podcast, we delve into the fabric of blockchain technology with StarkWare's Noam Nisan.

隨著加密技術的發展,我們開始看到這種系統的出現,這些系統由諸如Stating等新型機制提供支持。本週,在Clear Crypto播客中,我們使用Starkware的Noam Nisan深入研究區塊鏈技術的結構。

The Clear Crypto Podcast is brought to you by ClearFi, the industry's leading defi hedge fund.

明確的加密播客是由行業領先的對沖基金Clearfi帶給您的。

Subscribe to ClearFi's newsletter for the latest in defi: https://clearfi.io/newsletter

訂閱Clearfi的新聞通訊,以獲取最新的DEFI:https://clearfi.io/newsletter

The Clear Crypto Podcast is sponsored by Ledger, the hardware wallet to securely buy, store and manage crypto. Get 10% off your Ledger Nano S Plus or Ledger Nano X with the code 'CLEARCRYPTO'. Order now on Ledger's website: https://clearcrypto.io/ledger

Clear Crypto播客是由Ledger(安全購買,存儲和管理加密貨幣的硬件錢包)贊助的。用代碼“ ClearCrypto”獲得分類帳Nano S Plus或Ledger X的10%折扣。立即在Ledger的網站上訂購:https://clearcrypto.io/ledger

This week's episode is filled with insightful discussions on the essence of staking and its role in the broader ecosystem.

本週的情節充滿了有關陳述本質及其在更廣泛的生態系統中的作用的深刻見解的討論。

Joining the hosts, Gareth Jenkinson and Nathan Jeffay, is Noam Nisan, principal researcher at StarkWare and a renowned computer scientist with experience at Google and Princeton. Together, they explore the trustless engine at the heart of crypto and how it keeps itself in check.

加入主持人Gareth Jenkinson和Nathan Jeffay是Starkware的首席研究員Noam Nisan,也是著名的計算機科學家,在Google和Princeton擁有經驗豐富。他們一起探索了加密貨幣核心的無信任引擎,以及它如何控制自己。

"We have this general system with operators ... and the question is, why would they want to do that? The system, the protocol, incentivizes them to actually run the system. So it can give them tokens for operating the system," Nisan explained.

Nisan解釋說:“我們有一個帶有操作員的通用系統……問題是,他們為什麼要這樣做?系統,協議激勵他們實際運行系統。因此,它可以為他們提供用於操作系統的令牌。”

This, he adds, provides two layers of security: one based on computer science and the other based on economic disincentives for bad actors.

他補充說,這提供了兩層安全:一個基於計算機科學,另一個基於對不良行為者的經濟障礙。

"If a majority or supermajority — maybe two-thirds — of the parties of the token of the staked amount are behaving properly, and if the total staked amount is sufficiently large, then we can prove that the system acts correctly despite the possibility of some parties misbehaving."

“如果大多數或超大的人(也許是三分之二)的固定量的當事方的行為正常,並且如果總的固定數量足夠大,那麼我們可以證明該系統的行為正確,儘管某些政黨可能會誤會誤會。”

The conversation further touches upon the classic PoW vs PoS comparison, with Jenkinson, a recognized Bitcoin BTCUSD supporter, asking Nisan if he has "any strong feelings" about one or the other.

談話進一步涉及了經典的戰俘與POS比較,與公認的比特幣BTCUSD支持者詹金森(Jenkinson)詢問尼桑(Nisan)對一個人有“任何強烈的感覺”。

"They have different advantages and disadvantages," Nisan responds, highlighting that PoW is more expensive but provides a "simple majority rule" for chain selection, while PoS offers lower costs but requires a "supermajority or two-thirds of the parties to be behaving properly." Both mechanisms also present trade-offs in terms of control and decentralization.

Nisan回答說:“它們具有不同的優勢和缺點。”強調POW更昂貴,但為鏈選擇提供了“簡單的多數規則”,而POS則提供了較低的成本,但需要“超級歡樂或三分之二的當事方必須正確行為”。兩種機制也都在控制和權力下放方面呈現權衡。

The episode also delves into the interplay of tokenomics and system design. Nisan explains how fee mechanics and inflation controls, such as Ethereum's minting curve for new tokens, are crucial for keeping the ecosystem in balance.

這一集還深入研究了令牌和系統設計的相互作用。 Nisan解釋了費用機械師和通貨膨脹控制(例如以太坊的新令牌鑄造曲線)如何對保持生態系統保持平衡至關重要。

To hear the full conversation on The Clear Crypto Podcast, listen to the full episode on Cointelegraph’s Podcasts page, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And don’t forget to check out Cointelegraph’s full lineup of other shows!

要聆聽Clear Crypto播客上的完整對話,請收聽Cointelegraph的播客頁面上的完整劇集,Apple Podcasts或Spotify。而且,不要忘記查看Cointelegraph的其他演出陣容!

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年05月23日 其他文章發表於