美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 擴大針對幣安的訴訟範圍，將更多代幣歸類為證券

美國證券交易委員會（SEC）擴大了對流行加密貨幣交易所幣安的訴訟範圍。

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has expanded its lawsuit against Binance, a major cryptocurrency exchange.

美國證券交易委員會（SEC）擴大了對主要加密貨幣交易所幣安的訴訟範圍。

The SEC’s amended complaint now includes several more tokens—Axie Infinity (AXS), Filecoin (FIL), Cosmos (ATOM), Sandbox (SAND), and Decentraland (MANA)—which the agency recently classified as securities. This move highlights the SEC’s ongoing efforts to regulate the cryptocurrency industry by classifying different digital assets as securities.

SEC 修改後的投訴現在包括了更多代幣——Axie Infinity (AXS)、Filecoin (FIL)、Cosmos (ATOM)、Sandbox (SAND) 和Decentraland (MANA)——該機構最近將這些代幣歸類為證券。此舉凸顯了美國證券交易委員會將不同的數位資產歸類為證券來監管加密貨幣行業的持續努力。

In its amended complaint, the SEC alleges that Binance and its U.S. affiliate, BAM Trading, facilitated transactions involving the newly classified securities on its platform. According to the agency, Binance’s platforms were used to disseminate promotional materials from promoters and issuers, presenting these tokens as sound investments.

美國證券交易委員會在修訂後的起訴書中稱，幣安及其美國附屬公司 BAM Trading 在其平台上促進了涉及新分類證券的交易。據該機構稱，幣安的平台被用來傳播發起人和發行人的宣傳材料，將這些代幣展示為合理的投資。

This action is part of the SEC’s broader initiative to enforce governance and compliance in the cryptocurrency sector.

這項行動是 SEC 加強加密貨幣產業治理和合規性的更廣泛舉措的一部分。

In its update, the SEC reiterates that Binance is not registered as a clearing agency, broker-dealer, or exchange. The agency alleges that Binance failed to disclose the risks and legality of the tokens traded on both its international and US platforms and that it used interstate commerce mechanisms to carry out securities transactions on behalf of others.

美國證券交易委員會在更新中重申，幣安並未註冊為清算機構、經紀自營商或交易所。該機構指控幣安未能披露在其國際和美國平台上交易的代幣的風險和合法性，並利用州際商業機制代表他人進行證券交易。

The expansion of the lawsuit has sparked criticism over the SEC’s regulatory approach. This criticism intensified recently after the SEC acknowledged the challenges in defining the term “crypto asset security,” leading to allegations of inconsistent regulation.

訴訟規模的擴大引發了對 SEC 監管方式的批評。最近，在美國證券交易委員會承認定義「加密資產安全」一詞面臨挑戰後，這種批評愈演愈烈，導致監管不一致的指控。

Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, slammed the SEC for making contradictory allegations, highlighting specific discrepancies found in the updated complaint.

Ripple 的首席法律官 Stuart Alderoty 抨擊 SEC 提出了相互矛盾的指控，並強調了更新後的投訴中發現的具體差異。

Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, has also pointed out apparent contradictions in the SEC’s stance. He highlighted the SEC’s previous characterization of XRP as a security in its 2020 lawsuit against Ripple, suggesting that the regulator’s shifting positions may confuse courts and stakeholders.

Coinbase 首席法律長 Paul Grewal 也指出了 SEC 立場的明顯矛盾。他強調了 SEC 先前在 2020 年針對 Ripple 的訴訟中將 XRP 定性為證券的情況，這表明監管機構立場的轉變可能會讓法院和利益相關者感到困惑。

This ongoing legal and regulatory saga continues to influence the landscape of cryptocurrency regulation and enforcement.

這一持續的法律和監管傳奇繼續影響著加密貨幣監管和執法的格局。

Also Read: SEC Drops Solana from List of Accused Binance Securities

另請閱讀：SEC 將 Solana 從被指控的幣安證券名單中刪除