CTV：在爭議中增強比特幣的安全性

透過讓用戶從特定錢包建立指定的支出標準（通常稱為「契約」），CTV 旨在提高比特幣的實用性。

Bitcoin.org domain maintainer Cobra has expressed concern over a potential user-activated soft fork (UASF) in 2025, which could pose a crucial crossroads for the Bitcoin network.

Bitcoin.org 網域維護者 Cobra 對 2025 年潛在的用戶啟動軟分叉（UASF）表示擔憂，這可能會為比特幣網路帶來一個關鍵的十字路口。

Under Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 119 (BIP 119), this project—run by anonymous developers outside the Bitcoin Core team—aims to introduce CheckTemplateVerify (CTV).

根據比特幣改進提案 119 (BIP 119)，該專案由比特幣核心團隊以外的匿名開發人員運行，旨在引入 CheckTemplateVerify (CTV)。

Some Bitcoiners are going to attempt to soft fork in CTV through a UASF sometime in 2025. Developers (outside of Core) are working right now on the code and activation parameters. Not enough people are paying attention to this.

一些比特幣愛好者將在 2025 年的某個時候嘗試透過 UASF 在 CTV 中進行軟分叉。沒有足夠的人關注這一點。

— Cøbra (@CobraBitcoin) November 30, 2024

— Cøbra (@CobraBitcoin) 2024 年 11 月 30 日

The proposed CTV aims to enhance Bitcoin’s utility by enabling users to set specific spending conditions—often called “covenants”—from specific wallets. These capabilities, according to proponents, could transform cold storage security and open up the network to more advanced smart contract applications.

擬議的 CTV 旨在透過使用戶能夠從特定錢包設定特定的支出條件（通常稱為「契約」）來增強比特幣的實用性。支持者稱，這些功能可以改變冷儲存安全性，並將網路開放給更先進的智慧合約應用程式。

With CTV, users would gain unprecedented control over their transactions, ensuring that their funds can only be spent under the specified conditions. This could be particularly useful for institutional investors and anyone seeking high-security measures for their assets.

透過 CTV，用戶將獲得前所未有的交易控制權，確保他們的資金只能在指定條件下使用。這對於機構投資者和任何為其資產尋求高安全措施的人來說尤其有用。

However, the concept has not been without its share of controversy. Opponents of BIP 119 have raised concerns about how these covenants may impact Bitcoin’s fungibility—the concept that each unit of the currency is equal and interchangeable.

然而，這個概念並非沒有爭議。 BIP 119 的反對者對這些契約可能會如何影響比特幣的可替代性（即每個貨幣單位都是平等且可互換的概念）表示擔憂。

Specifically, some worry that restricting spending may create a distinction between covenanted and non-covenanted coins, compromising the network’s neutrality. Additionally, the increased complexity of Bitcoin’s core raises security concerns, as new features may inadvertently introduce exploitable vulnerabilities.

具體來說，有些人擔心限制支出可能會造成契約幣和非契約幣之間的區別，從而損害網路的中立性。此外，比特幣核心複雜性的增加引發了安全性問題，因為新功能可能會無意中引入可利用的漏洞。

The broader Bitcoin community remains divided on the acceptance of CTV. While some of its proponents highlight the potential for new use cases and enhanced security, others caution against hasty implementation of an untested concept.

更廣泛的比特幣社群對於 CTV 的接受程度仍然存在分歧。雖然它的一些支持者強調了新用例和增強安全性的潛力，但其他人則警告不要倉促實施未經測試的概念。

This divergence underscores a fundamental tension within the ecosystem: balancing development with the preservation of Bitcoin’s core ethos.

這種分歧凸顯了生態系統內的根本緊張關係：平衡發展與保護比特幣的核心精神。

Meanwhile, as reported, a crypto analyst has shared an analysis on Bitcoin’s current cycle, considering whether it marks the end of the network’s traditional four-year cycles. With increasing corporate adoption and government interest, Bitcoin’s cycles may be drastically changing.

同時，據報道，一位加密貨幣分析師分享了對比特幣當前週期的分析，考慮這是否標誌著該網路傳統四年周期的結束。隨著企業採用率的增加和政府興趣的增加，比特幣的週期可能會發生巨大變化。

Recommended for you:

為您推薦：