CTV：在争议中增强比特币的安全性

通过让用户从特定钱包建立指定的支出标准（通常称为“契约”），CTV 旨在提高比特币的实用性。

Bitcoin.org domain maintainer Cobra has expressed concern over a potential user-activated soft fork (UASF) in 2025, which could pose a crucial crossroads for the Bitcoin network.

Bitcoin.org 域名维护者 Cobra 对 2025 年潜在的用户激活软分叉（UASF）表示担忧，这可能会给比特币网络带来一个关键的十字路口。

Under Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 119 (BIP 119), this project—run by anonymous developers outside the Bitcoin Core team—aims to introduce CheckTemplateVerify (CTV).

根据比特币改进提案 119 (BIP 119)，该项目由比特币核心团队之外的匿名开发人员运行，旨在引入 CheckTemplateVerify (CTV)。

Some Bitcoiners are going to attempt to soft fork in CTV through a UASF sometime in 2025. Developers (outside of Core) are working right now on the code and activation parameters. Not enough people are paying attention to this.

一些比特币爱好者将在 2025 年的某个时候尝试通过 UASF 在 CTV 中进行软分叉。开发人员（Core 之外）目前正在研究代码和激活参数。没有足够的人关注这一点。

— Cøbra (@CobraBitcoin) November 30, 2024

— Cøbra (@CobraBitcoin) 2024 年 11 月 30 日

The proposed CTV aims to enhance Bitcoin’s utility by enabling users to set specific spending conditions—often called “covenants”—from specific wallets. These capabilities, according to proponents, could transform cold storage security and open up the network to more advanced smart contract applications.

拟议的 CTV 旨在通过使用户能够从特定钱包设置特定的支出条件（通常称为“契约”）来增强比特币的实用性。支持者称，这些功能可以改变冷存储安全性，并将网络开放给更先进的智能合约应用程序。

With CTV, users would gain unprecedented control over their transactions, ensuring that their funds can only be spent under the specified conditions. This could be particularly useful for institutional investors and anyone seeking high-security measures for their assets.

通过 CTV，用户将获得前所未有的交易控制权，确保他们的资金只能在指定条件下使用。这对于机构投资者和任何为其资产寻求高安全措施的人来说尤其有用。

However, the concept has not been without its share of controversy. Opponents of BIP 119 have raised concerns about how these covenants may impact Bitcoin’s fungibility—the concept that each unit of the currency is equal and interchangeable.

然而，这个概念并非没有争议。 BIP 119 的反对者对这些契约可能会如何影响比特币的可替代性（即每个货币单位都是平等且可互换的概念）表示担忧。

Specifically, some worry that restricting spending may create a distinction between covenanted and non-covenanted coins, compromising the network’s neutrality. Additionally, the increased complexity of Bitcoin’s core raises security concerns, as new features may inadvertently introduce exploitable vulnerabilities.

具体来说，一些人担心限制支出可能会造成契约币和非契约币之间的区别，从而损害网络的中立性。此外，比特币核心复杂性的增加引发了安全问题，因为新功能可能会无意中引入可利用的漏洞。

The broader Bitcoin community remains divided on the acceptance of CTV. While some of its proponents highlight the potential for new use cases and enhanced security, others caution against hasty implementation of an untested concept.

更广泛的比特币社区对于 CTV 的接受程度仍然存在分歧。虽然它的一些支持者强调了新用例和增强安全性的潜力，但其他人则警告不要仓促实施未经测试的概念。

This divergence underscores a fundamental tension within the ecosystem: balancing development with the preservation of Bitcoin’s core ethos.

这种分歧凸显了生态系统内的根本紧张关系：平衡发展与保护比特币的核心精神。

Meanwhile, as reported, a crypto analyst has shared an analysis on Bitcoin’s current cycle, considering whether it marks the end of the network’s traditional four-year cycles. With increasing corporate adoption and government interest, Bitcoin’s cycles may be drastically changing.

与此同时，据报道，一位加密货币分析师分享了对比特币当前周期的分析，考虑这是否标志着该网络传统四年周期的结束。随着企业采用率的增加和政府兴趣的增加，比特币的周期可能会发生巨大变化。

Recommended for you:

为您推荐：