據稱，據稱將2300萬美元的ACX代幣轉移到其母公司，點燃了治理風暴並提出有關DAO透明度的問題，因此在整個環境中受到了抨擊。

Across Crypto Project Faces Heat: Secret $23M Transfer Sparks Governance Debate

整個加密項目面臨熱火：秘密$ 2300萬轉移火花治理辯論

The DeFi world is buzzing with drama as bridge protocol Across finds itself at the center of a controversy. Allegations have surfaced regarding a secret transfer of $23 million in ACX tokens to its parent organization, Risk Labs. Let's dive into the details of this developing situation.

當時的橋樑協議發現自己處於爭議的中心。關於將2300萬美元的ACX代幣轉移給其母公司風險實驗室的指控。讓我們深入了解這種發展情況的細節。

The Allegations: Opaque Moves and Insider Control?

指控：不透明的動作和內部控制？

Ogle, a well-known crypto commentator, dropped a bombshell by accusing Across of orchestrating governance votes to funnel $23 million worth of ACX tokens ($15 million and $7.5 million) to Risk Labs. Ogle claims this move was self-serving and opaque, painting the DAO as a facade controlled by insiders.

著名的加密評論員Ogle通過指責在策劃治理投票的情況下放棄了重磅炸彈，將價值2300萬美元的ACX代幣（1500萬美元和750萬美元）匯入了風險實驗室。 Ogle聲稱這一舉動是自私的和不透明的，將DAO描繪成由內部人員控制的外牆。

Across CEO Fires Back: Transparency vs. Accusations

首席執行官射擊：透明度與指控

Hart Lambur, CEO of Across, vehemently denied the allegations, calling them “completely false.” He defended the transfers as legitimate funding for protocol upgrades, emphasizing that all voting was conducted transparently. Lambur also challenged Ogle’s credibility, citing past controversies.

跨首席執行官哈特·蘭布爾（Hart Lambur）強烈否認了這些指控，稱它們“完全是錯誤的”。他捍衛轉讓作為協議升級的合法資金，強調所有投票都是透明的。蘭伯（Lambur）也以過去的爭議挑戰了奧格爾（Ogle）的信譽。

LayerZero Co-founder Enters the Fray: Accusations of Insider Trading

lyezero聯合創始人進入競爭：內幕交易的指控

Adding fuel to the fire, LayerZero co-founder Brian Pellegrino suggested Lambur purchased ACX ahead of its Binance listing. Lambur refuted this claim, stating the team learned about the listing after the fact, just like everyone else. Talk about a heated debate!

LayerZero聯合創始人Brian Pellegrino為火災增加了燃料，建議Lambur在其Binance上市之前購買了ACX。 Lambur駁斥了這一主張，指出團隊像其他所有人一樣了解了事實之後的清單。談論激烈的辯論！

The Fallout: Token Price Drop and Governance Concerns

後果：代幣的價格下跌和治理問題

Despite Ogle admitting some uncertainty, the situation has raised serious questions about governance integrity within Across. The ACX token took a hit, dropping around 10% following the revelations. This incident underscores the broader concerns about the true decentralization of DAOs.

儘管Ogle承認了一些不確定性，但這種情況仍引發了有關跨越治理完整性的嚴重問題。 ACX代幣受到了打擊，啟示後下降了約10％。這一事件強調了對Daos真正權力下放的廣泛關注。

Behind-the-Scenes Tension: A DeFi Norm?

幕後緊張：一種規範？

As is often the case in the DeFi space, this controversy highlights the behind-the-scenes tension, anonymous whistleblowers, and token politics that frequently collide. It serves as a reminder that not everything is always as decentralized as it seems.

與Defi空間中通常情況一樣，這一爭議突出了幕後緊張，匿名舉報人和經常碰撞的代幣政治。它提醒人們，並非所有事物總是像看起來一樣分散。

The Big Picture: What Does This Mean for DeFi?

大局：這對Defi意味著什麼？

This situation with Across underscores the critical need for transparency and accountability within DAOs. While decentralized governance is a core tenet of DeFi, incidents like this raise concerns about potential manipulation and insider control. It’s essential for protocols to prioritize transparency and ensure that governance processes are truly democratic.

這種情況下強調了Daos內對透明度和問責制的關鍵需求。儘管分散的治理是DEFI的核心原則，但此類事件引起了人們對潛在操縱和內部控制的擔憂。協議優先考慮透明度並確保治理過程真正民主是至關重要的。

So, what’s the takeaway? In the wild world of DeFi, always remember to do your own research and stay vigilant. Because in the end, it's a jungle out there! Until next time, keep your crypto close and your eyes even closer!

那麼，收穫是什麼？在Defi的狂野世界中，請務必記住自己的研究並保持警惕。因為最後，它是一個叢林！直到下一次，請保持加密貨幣，眼睛更近！