据称，据称将2300万美元的ACX代币转移到其母公司，点燃了治理风暴并提出有关DAO透明度的问题，因此在整个环境中受到了抨击。

Across Crypto Project Faces Heat: Secret $23M Transfer Sparks Governance Debate

整个加密项目面临热火：秘密$ 2300万转移火花治理辩论

The DeFi world is buzzing with drama as bridge protocol Across finds itself at the center of a controversy. Allegations have surfaced regarding a secret transfer of $23 million in ACX tokens to its parent organization, Risk Labs. Let's dive into the details of this developing situation.

当时的桥梁协议发现自己处于争议的中心。关于将2300万美元的ACX代币转移给其母公司风险实验室的指控。让我们深入了解这种发展情况的细节。

The Allegations: Opaque Moves and Insider Control?

指控：不透明的动作和内部控制？

Ogle, a well-known crypto commentator, dropped a bombshell by accusing Across of orchestrating governance votes to funnel $23 million worth of ACX tokens ($15 million and $7.5 million) to Risk Labs. Ogle claims this move was self-serving and opaque, painting the DAO as a facade controlled by insiders.

著名的加密评论员Ogle通过指责在策划治理投票的情况下放弃了重磅炸弹，将价值2300万美元的ACX代币（1500万美元和750万美元）汇入了风险实验室。 Ogle声称这一举动是自私的和不透明的，将DAO描绘成由内部人员控制的外墙。

Across CEO Fires Back: Transparency vs. Accusations

首席执行官射击：透明度与指控

Hart Lambur, CEO of Across, vehemently denied the allegations, calling them “completely false.” He defended the transfers as legitimate funding for protocol upgrades, emphasizing that all voting was conducted transparently. Lambur also challenged Ogle’s credibility, citing past controversies.

跨首席执行官哈特·兰布尔（Hart Lambur）强烈否认了这些指控，称它们“完全是错误的”。他捍卫转让作为协议升级的合法资金，强调所有投票都是透明的。兰伯（Lambur）也以过去的争议挑战了奥格尔（Ogle）的信誉。

LayerZero Co-founder Enters the Fray: Accusations of Insider Trading

lyezero联合创始人进入竞争：内幕交易的指控

Adding fuel to the fire, LayerZero co-founder Brian Pellegrino suggested Lambur purchased ACX ahead of its Binance listing. Lambur refuted this claim, stating the team learned about the listing after the fact, just like everyone else. Talk about a heated debate!

LayerZero联合创始人Brian Pellegrino为火灾增加了燃料，建议Lambur在其Binance上市之前购买了ACX。 Lambur驳斥了这一主张，指出团队像其他所有人一样了解了事实之后的清单。谈论激烈的辩论！

The Fallout: Token Price Drop and Governance Concerns

后果：代币的价格下跌和治理问题

Despite Ogle admitting some uncertainty, the situation has raised serious questions about governance integrity within Across. The ACX token took a hit, dropping around 10% following the revelations. This incident underscores the broader concerns about the true decentralization of DAOs.

尽管Ogle承认了一些不确定性，但这种情况仍引发了有关跨越治理完整性的严重问题。 ACX代币受到了打击，启示后下降了约10％。这一事件强调了对Daos真正权力下放的广泛关注。

Behind-the-Scenes Tension: A DeFi Norm?

幕后紧张：一种规范？

As is often the case in the DeFi space, this controversy highlights the behind-the-scenes tension, anonymous whistleblowers, and token politics that frequently collide. It serves as a reminder that not everything is always as decentralized as it seems.

与Defi空间中通常情况一样，这一争议突出了幕后紧张，匿名举报人和经常碰撞的代币政治。它提醒人们，并非所有事物总是像看起来一样分散。

The Big Picture: What Does This Mean for DeFi?

大局：这对Defi意味着什么？

This situation with Across underscores the critical need for transparency and accountability within DAOs. While decentralized governance is a core tenet of DeFi, incidents like this raise concerns about potential manipulation and insider control. It’s essential for protocols to prioritize transparency and ensure that governance processes are truly democratic.

这种情况下强调了Daos内对透明度和问责制的关键需求。尽管分散的治理是DEFI的核心原则，但此类事件引起了人们对潜在操纵和内部控制的担忧。协议优先考虑透明度并确保治理过程真正民主是至关重要的。

So, what’s the takeaway? In the wild world of DeFi, always remember to do your own research and stay vigilant. Because in the end, it's a jungle out there! Until next time, keep your crypto close and your eyes even closer!

那么，收获是什么？在Defi的狂野世界中，请务必记住自己的研究并保持警惕。因为最后，它是一个丛林！直到下一次，请保持加密货币，眼睛更近！