加密投資者最近發現了一個陌生的標記為“ ethg”的代幣

加密投資者最近發現了一個陌生的標記為“ ethg”的代幣

A crypto investor was left baffled after logging into his Uniswap-linked wallet to find an unfamiliar token, labeled "ETHG" for Ethereum Games, in his balance with a valuation exceeding $420,000.

一位加密投資者登錄了他的單款鏈接錢包後，他感到困惑，以找到一個不熟悉的代幣，標有“ Ethg”的以太坊遊戲，其估值超過420,000美元。

The investor, who preferred to remain anonymous, confirmed that he had never purchased or interacted with this token, leading him to suspect a scam.

寧願保持匿名的投資者確認他從未購買過這個令牌，導致他懷疑騙局。

According to Blockaid, an on-chain security platform, the token was flagged as malicious. The token price, displayed at $0.211 per unit with a balance of 2 million ETHG, might appear substantial at first glance. However, this displayed value is essentially meaningless since the token lacks any real liquidity.

據鏈上安全平台Blockaid稱，令牌被標記為惡意。乍一看，令牌價格為每單位0.211美元，餘額為200萬ELTH，乍一看可能似乎很大。但是，由於令牌缺乏任何真正的流動性，因此顯示的價值本質上是毫無意義的。

The price is calculated by multiplying the last recorded trade price by the token balance. This can be easily manipulated by scammers through wash trades or artificial price setting on illiquid tokens to create staggeringly large but ultimately useless token valuations.

價格是通過將最後一個記錄的交易價格乘以令牌餘額來計算的。騙子可以通過WASH交易或非流動令牌的人造價格設定來輕鬆操縱這一點，從而創造出驚人的大型但最終無用的代幣估值。

The investor reached out to Vet (@Vet_X0), a validator on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), for an explanation.

投資者與XRP Ledger（XRPL）上的驗證器獸醫（@Vet_x0）聯繫了獸醫（@vet_x0）。

"This is unfortunately the downside to blockchains that handle everything with smart contracts like ETH. Do NOT, under any circumstances, interact with these tokens or the sites linked with it," explained Vet.

Vet解釋說：“不幸的是，這是區塊鏈用智能合約等所有內容等所有內容的缺點。在任何情況下，都不要與這些令牌或與之相關的站點進行互動。”

"You're risking dangerous approval exploits to empty your whole wallet (infinite token approval). Interacting with these kinds of tokens on Ethereum opens the door to dangerous exploits."

“您可能會冒著危險的批准利用來清空整個錢包（無限代幣批准）。與以太坊上的這些令牌互動為危險的利用打開了大門。”

He further highlighted the difference in architecture between the XRPL and Ethereum. While both handle tokens, the XRPL has native support for issued tokens without relying on smart contracts.

他進一步強調了XRPL和以太坊之間建築的差異。儘管兩個都處理令牌，但XRPL在不依賴智能合約的情況下對發行的代幣都有本機支持。

"On the XRPL, you must explicitly trust a token issuer through a trustline before receiving any token. Additionally, users can easily zero out or remove trustlines at will without granting token-level approvals or exposing their wallet to contract calls."

“在XRPL上，您必須在收到任何令牌之前通過信任線明確信任令牌發行人。此外，用戶可以隨意輕鬆零或刪除信任，而無需授予令牌級別的批准或將其錢包暴露給合同電話。”

This stands in contrast to Ethereum, where tokens are automatically sent to wallets without permission and users might be tricked into engaging with a malicious smart contract upon attempting to swap the token, potentially leading to the drainage of their entire wallet.

這與以太坊形成鮮明對比的是，在未經許可的情況下，代幣會自動將其發送到錢包，並且用戶可能會在試圖交換令牌時與惡意智能合約互動，並可能導致整個錢包的排水。

"This is something the creators of XRP had the foresight to mitigate with the trustline system," added Vet.

VET補充說：“這是XRP的創建者俱有前瞻性來減輕信任系統系統的東西。”

"It's a small but crucial difference that can have enormous consequences, especially in the face of scams."

“這是一個很小但至關重要的差異，可能會帶來巨大的後果，尤其是面對騙局。”