查爾斯·霍斯金森（Charles Hoskinson）在最新的兩個小時的詢問中提出了他對卡爾達諾未來的願景

查爾斯·霍斯金森（Charles Hoskinson）在5月24日的最新兩個小時的詢問範圍從個人軼事到量子時代的思想實驗不等

Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, hosted a two-hour Ask-Me-Anything session on May 24, where he touched on a variety of topics, from personal anecdotes to quantum-era thought experiments.

Cardano的創始人查爾斯·霍斯金森（Charles Hoskinson）在5月24日舉辦了兩個小時的詢問，他談到了各種主題，從個人軼事到量子時代的思想實驗。

Throughout the broadcast, Hoskinson repeatedly circled back to a single theme: the network must evolve—both technically and politically—if it is to compete in an age of zero-knowledge, AI-assisted finance.

在整個廣播中，霍斯金森一再回到一個主題：如果在技術上和政治上，網絡都必須在零知識，AI-AI-Ass Cansed Finance的時代進行競爭。

Early on, Hoskinson sketched out a testing ground for that evolution: a fully simulated “crypto city” populated by AI agents.

早些時候，霍斯金森（Hoskinson）勾勒出了該演變的測試場：AI代理商填充的一個完全模擬的“加密城市”。

“Why don’t you create a virtual city, and then you introduce crypto into the city … you just see all the transactions that go through and what happens with it.”

“為什麼不創建一個虛擬城市，然後將加密貨幣引入城市……您只會看到所有通過的交易以及它發生的一切。”

In his scenario, private stablecoins, roll-ups and even illicit actors would interplay inside a sandbox large enough to stress Cardano’s forthcoming privacy layer, Midnight, and its recursive-proof scaling stack. The experiment, he argued, would let developers “stop thinking of TPS and start thinking of … concurrent cities processing.”

在他的情況下，私人穩定幣，捲起甚至非法演員都會在足夠大的沙箱中相互作用，足以強調卡卡諾即將到來的隱私層，午夜及其防遞歸比例堆棧。他認為，該實驗將使開發人員“停止思考TP，開始思考……並發城市的處理”。

Behind the thought exercise lies a concrete roadmap. Hoskinson confirmed that Midnight’s trust-minimised bridge to Cardano is “on schedule,” positioning the sidechain as a de facto privacy hub where stablecoin issuers could launch fully compliant “private stablecoins” before bridging them into the main network. He doubled down on the idea that privacy-preserving assets will become existential: “The minute one person has it, everybody else is going to die.”

思想練習後面是一個具體的路線圖。霍斯金森（Hoskinson）確認，午夜的信任最終橋樑通往卡爾達諾（Cardano）是“按計劃進行的”，將Sidechain定位為事實上的隱私樞紐，StableCoin發行人可以在將它們啟動完整的“私人Stablecoins”之前，然後將其橋接到主要網絡中。他認為，保護隱私資產將變得生存的想法加倍：“一個人擁有它的那一刻，其他人都會死。”

That urgency also framed his call for faster finality. Cardano’s base protocol, Ouroboros, deliberately mirrors Bitcoin’s probabilistic security, but Hoskinson said the time has come for a BFT-style add-on. Ouroboros Paris, a finality gadget written by “Agalos and the team of Gigabrains,” would let partner chains settle to Cardano “in minutes” rather than the current half-day.

這種緊迫性也構成了他要求更快的命運的呼籲。 Cardano的基本協議Ouroboros故意反映了比特幣的概率安全性，但Hoskinson表示，現在是BFT風格的附加組件了。由“ Agalos and of Gigabrains團隊”撰寫的最終效果小工具Ouroboros Paris將使合作夥伴連鎖店“在幾分鐘之內”而不是目前的半天安頓下來。

He lamented pushback from engineering committees that repeatedly removed Paris from the official roadmap: “I will pay out of my own pocket to have Ouroboros Paris,” he said, describing the proposal’s journey through Intersect—the member-run body that now stewards Cardano’s codebase.

他感嘆工程委員會的推回，這些委員會反復將巴黎從官方路線圖中刪除：“我將從我自己的口袋裡付款，以讓歐博羅斯·巴黎（Ouroboros Paris）付款，”他描述了該提議穿過Intersect的旅程，這是成員經營的機構，該機構現在是管家Cardano Codebase。

Does Cardano Need A “President”?

卡達諾需要“總統”嗎？

Governance, indeed, was the morning’s dominant undercurrent. Hoskinson characterised Cardano’s post-Vasil polity as lopsided: a legislature and judiciary (community voting and constitutional committee) exist, but no clear executive authority to enforce branding, marketing or an integrated roadmap.

的確，治理是早晨的主流暗流。霍斯金森（Hoskinson）將卡爾達諾（Cardano）的後瓦西爾政治（Vasil Polity）描述為偏見：立法機關和司法機構（社區投票和憲法委員會），但沒有明確的行政權力來執行品牌，營銷或綜合路線圖。

“At some point you have to reintroduce some form of executive function,” he argued, floating a model in which a community-elected “president” would be rewarded in ADA for meeting network-level KPIs such as monthly active users or total value locked.

他說：“在某個時候，您必須重新引入某種形式的執行功能。”浮動一個模型，在該模型中，社區當選的“總統”將在ADA中獲得獎勵，以滿足網絡級的KPI，例如每月活躍的用戶或鎖定的總價值。

Without that accountability, he warned, roadmap items like Ouroboros Kronos—his favoured remedy for time-sync attacks—could languish indefinitely because “no one can really unilaterally say, ‘this is what’s going to happen.’”

他警告說，如果沒有這種問責制，他的路線圖項目（例如Oureoboros Kronos）（他喜歡時間同步攻擊的補救措施）會無限期地苦苦掙扎，因為“沒人能真正單方面地說，'這就是將會發生的事情。”

Technical privacy surfaced again when an audience member asked whether the long-dormant Crypsinous paper—private staking for Ouroboros—should be revived. Hoskinson acknowledged its conceptual elegance but cautioned that full anonymity would “take a big hit” on performance and complicate multi-resource consensus. Any resurrection, he said, would need to marry new zero-knowledge primitives with the emerging, multi-ledger world Cardano now targets.

當聽眾問長期休眠的克里普紙（為Ouroboros的私有紙張）是否可以恢復時，技術隱私再次浮出水面。霍斯金森（Hoskinson）承認其概念上的優雅性，但警告說，完全匿名將對性能“大受歡迎”，並使多回購共識變得複雜。他說，任何復活都需要將新的零知識原始基原始人與新興的，多人世界的卡爾達諾（World Cardano）的目標結合在一起。

That multi-ledger push was most vivid in his discussion of partner chains for Bitcoin DeFi. Hoskinson outlined a three-layer stack: first, a bridging mechanism built on BitVM-X and Hydra-backed operators to batch Bitcoin transactions; second, a wallet layer (headed by Lace) that abstracts the complexity; third, an ecosystem of Cardano DeFi apps refactored to accept Bitcoin collateral and fees.

在討論比特幣Defi的合作夥伴鏈中，這種多重推力是最生動的。霍斯金森（Hoskinson）概述了一個三層堆棧：首先，是建立在BITVM-X和Hydra支持的操作員上的橋接機制，以批量比特幣交易；其次，一個錢包層（由蕾絲領導），它抽象了複雜性。第三，Cardano Defi應用程序的生態系統被重構以接受比特幣抵押品和費用。

“Even five or ten percent coverage would be larger than the market cap of Aptos, Solana and pretty much Ethereum combined,” he claimed, dismissing Bitcoin maximalist objections with an analogy: “Gold is valuable whether it sits in a mine or a jewellery shop.”

他聲稱：“即使是五到百分之十的覆蓋範圍也比Aptos，Solana和幾乎以太坊的市值大。”他聲稱，以類比的方式駁斥了比特幣的最大反對意見：“無論是坐在礦山還是珠寶店裡，黃金都是有價值的。”

Amid the technical depth, Hoskinson’s frustration with misinformation was palpable. He returned repeatedly to what he called “600 articles, 50-plus million views” alleging that he had misappropriated unredeemed ICO funds—allegations he flatly denies and says will be negated in an imminent BDO forensic audit.

在技​​術深度中，霍斯金森對錯誤信息的挫敗感顯而易見。他反復返回他所謂的“ 600篇文章，500萬次觀看次數”，聲稱他已經挪用了未償還的ICO資金 - 他坦率地否認了平衡，並表示將在迫在眉睫的BDO法醫審核中否定。

Still, the founder’s tone was more determined than defensive. He framed every grievance—whether about “gridlock,” misaligned incentives or public defamation—as a data point in how decentralised systems mature.

儘管如此，創始人的語氣還是更堅定的而不是防禦性的。他將每一個申訴（無論是關於“僵局”，失誤的激勵措施或公眾誹謗）構成的，這是分散系統如何成熟的數據點。

“We have the right to rewrite the economic, political, and social systems of the world,” he said, linking Cardano’s ethos to his childhood fixation on unfinished games and four-dimensional puzzles: “If it’s not good enough for you, how could you possibly say it’s good enough

他說：“我們有權改寫世界的經濟，政治和社會體系。”他將Cardano的精神與他的童年時代的精神聯繫起來，對未完成的遊戲和四維難題聯繫在一起：“如果這對您不夠