美國證券交易委員會正在改變其對數位代幣分類的立場

美國證券交易委員會（SEC）似乎正在跟隨幣安的節奏跳舞，幣安是全球交易量最大的加密貨幣交易所。

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is reportedly seeking permission to amend its complaint against Binance, which may include new allegations regarding “Third Party Crypto Asset Securities”.

據報道，美國證券交易委員會（SEC）正在尋求許可修改其對幣安的投訴，其中可能包括有關「第三方加密資產證券」的新指控。

The regulator's move comes after a recent court development saw the SEC update its legal stance against Binance as the case continues to unfold. Previously, the SEC had aimed to classify several high-profile cryptocurrencies, including Solana (SOL), as securities. However, in a recent legal filing, the SEC appears to be ready to withdraw its demand to classify these tokens under securities laws.

在監管機構採取這項措施之前，隨著案件的繼續展開，美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 最近的法庭進展顯示，美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 更新了針對幣安的法律立場。在此之前，SEC 旨在將包括 Solana (SOL) 在內的幾種備受矚目的加密貨幣歸類為證券。然而，在最近的一份法律文件中，美國證券交易委員會似乎準備撤回根據證券法對這些代幣進行分類的要求。

This development is expected to have an impact not limited to Binance's operations alone but on the broader crypto sector, potentially ushering in a new era in regulation.

這項發展預計不僅會對幣安的營運產生影響，還會對更廣泛的加密貨幣產業產生影響，並有可能開創監管的新時代。

For many observers and key industry participants, the SEC's decision to amend the complaint shows that the regulator might be adopting a new approach to crypto regulation. The agency's filing states that it aims to seek approval to amend its complaint, “obviating the need for the Court to issue a ruling as to the sufficiency of the allegations as to those tokens at this time”. With these new requests, the SEC appears to have a newly found understanding of the digital asset space.

對於許多觀察家和主要行業參與者來說，美國證券交易委員會修改投訴的決定表明，監管機構可能正在採用一種新的加密貨幣監管方法。該機構的文件稱，其目標是尋求批准修改其投訴，「避免法院此時就這些代幣的指控是否充分做出裁決」。透過這些新要求，美國證券交易委員會似乎對數位資產領域有了新的理解。

As would be expected, this paradigm shift could potentially make room for a more accommodating regulatory framework. One that is poised to allow innovative minds to flourish while still paying proper attention to potential risks associated with cryptocurrencies.

正如預期的那樣，這種範式轉變可能會為更寬鬆的監管框架騰出空間。一種能夠讓創新思維蓬勃發展的方法，同時仍適當地關注與加密貨幣相關的潛在風險。

It might be worth noting that the SEC's initial push to categorize cryptocurrencies as securities wasn't always a witch-hunt as widely purporte

值得注意的是，美國證券交易委員會最初推動將加密貨幣歸類為證券並不總是像人們廣泛聲稱的那樣是一種政治迫害。