Bybit、凍結和去中心化：令人不寒而栗的區塊鏈控制

Bybit 的 Lazarus 安全實驗室發現了主要區塊鏈的資金凍結功能，引發了關於去中心化的爭論。你的資產真的是你的嗎？

In the ever-evolving world of blockchain, a new twist has emerged, raising eyebrows and sparking debate: the ability of certain blockchains to freeze or restrict user funds. Bybit's Lazarus Security Lab is leading the charge in uncovering these hidden mechanisms, and the implications for decentralization are significant.

在不斷發展的區塊鏈世界中，出現了一種新的變化，引起了人們的關注並引發了爭論：某些區塊鏈凍結或限制用戶資金的能力。 Bybit 的 Lazarus 安全實驗室正在帶頭揭露這些隱藏機制，這對去中心化的影響是重大的。

The Freeze Factor: Bybit's Findings

凍結因素：Bybit 的發現

Bybit's Lazarus Security Lab dropped a bombshell, revealing that 16 major blockchains possess built-in fund-freezing capabilities. An additional 19 could implement similar measures with minor tweaks. This means a significant portion of the crypto landscape isn't as decentralized as we might think. The report examined 166 blockchain networks using AI-driven analysis combined with manual review.

Bybit 的 Lazarus 安全實驗室拋出了一個重磅炸彈，揭露 16 個主要區塊鏈擁有內置資金凍結功能。另外 19 個國家可以實施類似的措施，但只需稍作調整。這意味著加密領域的很大一部分並不像我們想像的那樣去中心化。該報告使用人工智能驅動的分析與人工審核相結合的方式檢查了 166 個區塊鍊網絡。

These freezing mechanisms come in a few flavors:

這些凍結機制有幾種類型：

• Hardcoded Freezing: Built directly into the chain, like on BNB Chain and VeChain.
• Config File-Based Freezing: Relies on blacklists managed by validators, like on Sui and Aptos.
• On-Chain Smart Contracts: Utilized by chains like HECO.

These aren't just theoretical capabilities. They've been used in response to hacks and exploits, such as when Sui froze $162 million after the Cetus hack and BNB Chain froze assets after a $570 million exploit.

這些不僅僅是理論能力。它們被用來應對黑客攻擊和漏洞利用，例如 Cetus 黑客攻擊後 Sui 凍結了 1.62 億美元，BNB Chain 在 5.7 億美元漏洞利用後凍結了資產。

Transparency vs. Decentralization: A Balancing Act

透明度與去中心化：平衡之舉

The big question is: are these freezing capabilities a necessary evil, or a betrayal of blockchain's core principles? Bybit's report suggests that blockchain foundations aren't always transparent about these powers, which raises concerns about true decentralization. David Zong, Head of Group Risk Control and Security at Bybit, emphasizes the importance of transparency for building trust.

最大的問題是：這些凍結能力是一種必要的罪惡，還是對區塊鏈核心原則的背叛？ Bybit 的報告表明，區塊鏈基金會對這些權力並不總是透明的，這引發了人們對真正的去中心化的擔憂。 Bybit 集團風險控制和安全主管 David Zong 強調透明度對於建立信任的重要性。

Armin Reiter from A31 Labs notes that any blockchain *can* implement freezing. The key is whether the community and validators accept it. Bitcoin, for example, is unlikely to implement freezing due to strong community consensus against it.

A31 Labs 的 Armin Reiter 指出，任何區塊鏈“都可以”實現凍結。關鍵是社區和驗證者是否接受。例如，由於社區強烈反對，比特幣不太可能實施凍結。

The DeFi Dilemma: Security vs. Control

DeFi 困境：安全與控制

This revelation comes at a time when DeFi is facing increasing security threats. The Balancer hack, which siphoned off $129 million, highlights the vulnerabilities that exist. Freezing mechanisms *can* be a safety net, but they also centralize control.

這一消息的披露正值 DeFi 面臨日益嚴重的安全威脅之際。 Balancer 黑客攻擊造成 1.29 億美元損失，凸顯了存在的漏洞。凍結機制*可以*成為一個安全網，但它們也集中控制。

However, centralization isn't always the problem. As seen with the recent USDe and xUSD incidents, the true vulnerability lies in a lack of decentralization and transparency. Centralized entities with opaque data and rules can create more risk than decentralized systems with transparent mechanisms.

然而，中心化並不總是問題所在。從最近的 USDe 和 xUSD 事件可以看出，真正的漏洞在於缺乏去中心化和透明度。具有不透明數據和規則的中心化實體可能比具有透明機制的去中心化系統產生更多風險。

Looking Ahead: A Call for Openness

展望未來：呼籲開放

Bybit's Lazarus Security Lab is urging projects to publicly disclose their emergency intervention mechanisms. Transparency is key to building lasting trust among users and institutions as the crypto space matures.

Bybit 的 Lazarus 安全實驗室正在敦促項目公開披露其緊急干預機制。隨著加密貨幣領域的成熟，透明度是在用戶和機構之間建立持久信任的關鍵。

So, what's the takeaway? The discovery of fund-freezing capabilities in major blockchains is a wake-up call. It's a reminder that decentralization isn't a given, and that transparency is crucial. It seems that we need to carefully consider the tradeoffs between security and control.

那麼，要點是什麼？主要區塊鏈中資金凍結功能的發現敲響了警鐘。這提醒我們，去中心化並不是理所當然的，透明度至關重要。看來我們需要仔細考慮安全和控制之間的權衡。

Think of it this way: your crypto might be more like a bank account than you thought. But hey, at least you're now more informed about where your digital assets are chilling... or potentially being frozen. Stay frosty, crypto fam!

可以這樣想：您的加密貨幣可能比您想像的更像銀行賬戶。但是，嘿，至少您現在更了解您的數字資產在哪裡正在冷卻……或可能被凍結。保持冷漠，加密貨幣家族！