區塊鏈調查員Zachxbt聚焦了兩個人，礁石財務創始人Denko Mancheski和X用戶FukugoRyōshu

Zachxbt聚焦了兩個人，Reef Finance創始人Denko Mancheski和X用戶FukugoRyōshu，可能與突然的90％崩潰有關

Investigators are looking into the possibility that Reef Finance founder Denko Mancheski and X user Fukugo Ryōshu may be linked to the sudden 90% crash of Mantra’s OM token on April 13.

調查人員正在研究礁石財務創始人Denko Mancheski和X用戶FukugoRyōshu可能與4月13日Mantra OM Token突然發生的90％崩潰有關。

This speculation arises from a post by blockchain investigator ZachXBT, who has been following the incident closely. In his post on April 14, ZachXBT claimed that he keeps hearing the names Denko and Fukugo in connection with the incident, and that the duo were allegedly reaching out to a number of people, asking for massive loans against their OM in the days leading up to the -90% crash.

這種猜測是由區塊鏈研究者Zachxbt的一篇文章引起的，他一直在密切關注該事件。 Zachxbt在4月14日的帖子中聲稱，他一直在與事件有關的Denko和Fukugo的名字，據稱二人與許多人聯繫，要求在-90％崩潰之前對其OM進行大量貸款。

The two names I keep hearing tied to the Mantra incident are Denko (Reef Finance founder) and Fukogoryushu as they had allegedly been reaching out to a number of people asking for massive loans against their OM in the days leading up to the -90% crash. DM’s open for any info.

我一直在聽到的兩個名字與咒語事件有關的兩個名字是Denko（Reef Finance創始人）和Fukogoryushu，因為據稱他們一直在與許多人在撞車事故發生時與許多人尋求大規模貸款。 DM開放以獲​​取任何信息。

— ZachXBT (@ZachXBT) April 14, 2023

- Zachxbt（@zachxbt）2023年4月14日

According to the investigator, he arrived at these names after speaking with multiple people who were offered the deals in the industry.

根據調查員的說法，他在與多個被提供業界交易的人交談後就得出了這些名字。

Moreover, confirmed that Fukugo approached them with a similar request before the crash. While this interaction doesn’t necessarily denote any wrongdoing, it adds to the suspicions surrounding the event.

此外，確認福古（Fukugo）在崩潰前向他們提出了類似的要求。儘管這種互動不一定表示任何不當行為，但它增加了事件周圍的懷疑。

At press time, it was unclear if Mancheski and Fukugo had massive OM holdings or whether they had a relationship with the RWA project.

截至發稿時，尚不清楚Mancheski和Fukugo是否擁有大量OM持有量，或者他們是否與RWA項目有關係。

Mancheski and Fukugo have not yet responded to the allegations.

Mancheski和Fukugo尚未對這些指控做出回應。

Insider trading?

內線交易?

內線交易?

It is worth noting that ZachXBT’s claims deeply contrast with those of the broader community, which had been speculating that the token crash could allegedly be linked to insider trading activity.

值得注意的是，Zachxbt的主張與更廣泛的社區的說法與廣泛的社區形成鮮明對比，該聲明據稱據稱可能與內部人士交易活動有關。

Indeed, blockchain analysis platform Lookonchain, using data from Arkham Intelligence, claimed that wallets tied to large investors moved massive amounts of OM tokens to centralized exchanges just hours before the crash.

的確，使用阿卡姆情報公司（Arkham Intelligence）的數據，區塊鏈分析平台Lookonchain聲稱與大型投資者綁定的錢包將大量的OM令牌轉移到了崩潰前幾小時的集中交易所。

According to the firm, at least two wallets tied to Laser Digital, a Mantra investor, were part of a group that moved 43.6 million OM tokens, worth around $227 million, to exchanges. The platform also noted that another wallet connected to Shorooq Partners’ founding partner, Shane Shin, received 2 million OM tokens on the day of the crash. Shorooq is another investor in Mantra.

根據該公司的說法，至少有兩個與咒語投資者Laser Digital相關的錢包是該集團的一部分，該集團將4,360萬個OM代幣（價值約2.27億美元）移交給了交流。該平台還指出，另一個與Shorooq合作夥伴的創始合夥人Shane Shin相連的錢包在墜機當天收到了200萬個OM令牌。 Shorooq是另一個咒語的投資者。

However, responding to the circulating claims, Laser Digital and Shorooq have denied reports linking them to the recent token sales.

但是，在回應流通的說法時，激光數字和Shorooq否認了將它們與最近的令牌銷售聯繫起來的報告。

Laser Digital said it had not sold OM tokens or deposited them to OKX. It clarified that the wallets in question are not under its control and that no sales occurred from its allocation.

Laser Digital表示，它沒有出售OM令牌或將其存放到OKX。它澄清說，所討論的錢包不在其控制之下，並且分配中沒有任何銷售。

“Laser has no involvement in the recent price collapse of OM. Assertions circulating on social media that link Laser to ‘investor selling’ are factually incorrect and misleading,” the firm stated.

該公司表示：“激光沒有參與OM最近的價格崩潰。在社交媒體上流傳的斷言將激光與'投資者銷售'聯繫起來是不正確的和誤導的。”

Issuing a joint statement with R वास्तव में, Laser Digital added that it is focused on supporting the long-term success of R वास्तव में.

Laser Digital與R rवतवतव發表聯合聲明，並補充說，它專注於支持R r r rवतवतव的長期成功。

On the other hand, Shorooq also issued a statement denying any token sales during the crash. The firm explained that the OM collapse was triggered by a large forced liquidation during low-liquidity hours, sparking panic in the market.

另一方面，Shorooq還發表了一份聲明，否認墜機期間的任何令牌銷售。該公司解釋說，OM崩潰是在低流動性時間內大量強迫清算引發的，在市場上引起了恐慌。

“As long-term equity investors in MANTRA, our conviction hasn’t wavered. We’re here for the mission: enabling regulated real-world asset tokenization on-chain,” the statement concluded.

聲明總結說：“作為咒語的長期股權投資者，我們的信念並沒有動搖。我們在這裡進行任務：實現受監管的現實世界資產令牌化鍊鍊。”