![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
在本月對比特幣區塊鏈上非金融數據存儲的OP_Return戰爭中的個人攻擊和戲劇性之後,高級比特幣核心維護者Gloria Zhao刪除了她的X帳戶。
Gloria Zhao, a senior Bitcoin Core maintainer, has deleted her X account following a month of personal attacks and drama during this year’s OP_RETURN ‘war’ over non-financial data storage on Bitcoin’s blockchain.
高級比特幣核心維護者格洛里亞·佐(Gloria Zhao)在今年的OP_Return“戰爭”中,在比特幣區塊鏈上的非金融數據存儲中刪除了她的X帳戶。
As Chaincode Labs’ Antoine Poinsot, the developer responsible for the OP_RETURN proposal that started the war in April, said, the proposal was “heavily mediatized” and inflicted “a lot of wasted time to everybody.”
正如Chaincode Labs的Antoine Pooinsot一樣,負責4月份戰爭的OP_Return提案的開發人員說,該提案“重新調解了”,並“給所有人造成了很多浪費時間。”
It has also wiped out one of the most popular and active developers on Bitcoin’s most used social media network.
它還消除了比特幣最常用的社交媒體網絡上最受歡迎和活躍的開發人員之一。
In the days leading up to her X resignation, Zhao had become a vocal proponent for lifting OP_RETURN’s mempool datacarrier relay limit from 83 to hundreds of thousands of bytes. In essence, the change would have accommodated more non-financial data on Bitcoin’s ledger, like photos, games, third-party code, and business data.
在她X辭職的幾天中,Zhao成為將OP_Return的Mempool DataCarrier繼電器限制從83到數十萬個字節提升的人聲支持者。從本質上講,更改將在比特幣的分類帳中容納更多的非財務數據,例如照片,遊戲,第三方代碼和業務數據。
Her reasoning, like many of her Chaincode Labs and Brink colleagues, was that the limit was antiquated and essentially pointless because of alternative data storage elsewhere.
她的推理與許多鍊錶實驗室和邊緣同事一樣,是因為其他地方的替代數據存儲是過時的,基本上毫無意義。
She felt Bitcoin Core node software, by default, should accept and relay any large OP_RETURN outputs across its mempool queue of pending transactions.
默認情況下,她認為比特幣核心節點軟件應在其未決交易的Mempool隊列中接受併中繼併中繼任何大型OP_Return輸出。
That way, node operators would have a better view of fees and the transactions most likely to join Bitcoin’s next block.
這樣,節點運營商將對費用有更好的了解,而交易最有可能加入比特幣的下一個塊。
Conserving Bitcoin’s chain for BTC transactions
保存BTC交易的比特幣鏈
Although Zhao enjoyed plenty of support from her side of the debate, she also received an equal amount of negative feedback from the opposition.
儘管趙在辯論中得到了很多支持,但她也從反對派那裡得到了同等數量的負面反饋。
Defending OP_RETURN’s 83-byte limit is a large and growing number of conservative Bitcoin node operators who see no reason to ease storage for non-bitcoin (BTC) data. They call the photos and third-party data stuffed into OP_RETURN outputs “spam.”
捍衛OP_ReTurn的83字節限制是越來越多的保守比特幣節點操作員,他們認為沒有理由放鬆非比幣(BTC)數據。他們將塞入op_return輸出中的照片和第三方數據稱為“垃圾郵件”。
Lifting the 83-byte cap would only encourage more spam, conservatives argued, and arguments about modernization or harmonization of OP_RETURN with other data storage options by people like Zhao were unpersuasIVE.
保守主義者爭辯說,舉起83個字節帽只會鼓勵更多的垃圾郵件,以及關於Zhao這樣的人與其他數據存儲選項的現代化或協調的爭論,這是沒有說服力的。
Even imperfect limits can serve as deterrents, they argued.
他們認為,即使是不完善的限制也可以作為威懾。
In their view, the job of Bitcoin Core is to preserve a reference client for node operators to validate BTC transactions — not operate a distributed database akin to cloud storage.
他們認為,比特幣核心的工作是為節點操作員保留一個參考客戶端來驗證BTC事務 - 不操作類似於雲存儲的分佈式數據庫。
In any case, Zhao was on the side of easing OP_RETURN’s datacarrier limit. That made her eminently unpopular with her conservative opposition, including one of its leaders, BitcoinMechanic.
無論如何,Zhao位於放鬆OP_Return的數據載波限制的一邊。這使她與保守派的反對派非常不受歡迎,其中包括其一位領導人比特幣機械。
Gloria Zhao waves goodbye to OP_RETURN drama
Gloria Zhao向OP_Return戲劇道別
In a livestream on April 29, BitcoinMechanic bemoaned developers like Zhao and others who argued for the more progressive software default. At one point, he even attacked her credentials and credited her romantic relationship with another senior developer as a major reason she enjoyed GitHub code commit access.
在4月29日的直播中,比特幣機械厭惡了像Zhao這樣的開發人員和其他人爭取更進步的軟件默認的開發人員。有一次,他甚至攻擊了她的資格,並將她與另一位高級開發人員的浪漫關係稱讚,這是她喜歡Github Code的主要原因。
Retellings of that clip went viral on X as the OP_RETURN war raged on. Soon, in a classic telephone game-like mutation, BitcoinMechanic’s accusation of a simple love interest morphed into an implication that Zhao had “slept with someone to get her job.”
隨著OP_RETURN戰爭的爆發,該剪輯的重述在X上傳播。很快,在經典的電話遊戲般的突變中,比特幣機械對簡單的愛情興趣的指控變成了Zhao“與某人一起睡著找到她的工作”的暗示。
Although BitcoinMechanic never made that explicit accusation, many people attacked him for the insinuation.
儘管比特幣機械從未提出過明確的指控,但許多人攻擊了他的暗示。
Zhao also received more recent, negative attention after critics pointed out her role in wordplaying the definition of “deprecated” to serve her own interests.
在批評者指出她在單詞遊戲中的作用“棄用”以服務於自己的利益的定義中,趙還受到了最近的負面關注。
For whatever variety of reasons, Zhao has decided that her time on X has come to an end. She also has deleted her entire history of tweets and replies.Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Proton Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
無論出於何種原因,Zhao都認為她在X上的時間已經結束。她還刪除了她的整個推文和回复歷史。通過質子洩漏向我們發送電子郵件。有關更多知情的新聞,請關注我們在X,Bluesky和Google News上,或訂閱我們的YouTube頻道。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。