Binance推動駁回FTX的$ 1.76B訴訟，稱其在事實和法律上存在缺陷。

該案件與2021年回購交易和CZ臭名昭著的2022 Tweet聯繫在一起。 Binance認為FTX的崩潰是由於內部欺詐而不是外部責備。

Binance is pushing to dismiss FTX’s $1.76 billion lawsuit, arguing it’s flawed and ties to a 2021 buyback deal and former CEO Changpeng Zhao’s tweet.

Binance敦促駁回FTX的17.6億美元訴訟，認為這是有缺陷的，並與2021年回購交易和前首席執行官Changpeng Zhao的推文保持聯繫。

Another day, another crypto lawsuit. But this time, Binance is pushing back hard against a $1.76 billion lawsuit from the FTX estate, calling the case legally flawed and factually off-base.

另一天，另一項加密訴訟。但是這次，Binance正在努力反對FTX莊園的17.6億美元訴訟，稱此案是合法缺陷的，實際上是基本的。

The case, which was filed in December, ties back to a 2021 deal where FTX bought back a 20% stake it had previously sold to Binance for roughly $1.76 billion in BNB, BUSD, and FTT tokens. FTX now claims it was already insolvent at the time and used customer funds to finance the buyback.

該案件於12月提起訴訟，與2021年的一筆交易聯繫起來，FTX在BNB，BUSD和FTT Tokens中以大約17.6億美元的價格賣給了Binance的20％股份。 FTX現在聲稱當時已經破產了，並使用客戶資金為回購提供資金。

However, Binance’s lawyers say that theory doesn’t hold up, arguing that FTX continued running its business for more than a year after the deal – hardly the behavior of a company already in collapse.

但是，Binance的律師說，理論並不堅持，認為FTX在交易後繼續經營其業務超過一年，這幾乎是一家已經崩潰的公司的行為。

The filing calls the suit an attempt to rewrite the story and ignore that FTX’s downfall stemmed from “one of the most massive corporate frauds in history.” This is clearly a not-so-subtle nod to Sam Bankman-Fried, who’s now serving 25 years in prison for defrauding customers and investors.

該文件稱該訴訟是為了重寫故事，而忽略了FTX的倒台源於“歷史上最龐大的公司欺詐之一”。顯然，這對山姆·班克曼（Sam Bankman）的炸薯條並不那麼微妙，後者現在因欺騙客戶和投資者而入獄25年。

The case will also follow former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao’s tweet on November 6, 2022, where he announced that Binance would liquidate its FTT holdings, citing “recent revelations.” That tweet, according to FTX, sparked a wave of customer withdrawals and helped tip the platform over the edge.

該案還將在2022年11月6日前Binance首席執行官Changpeng Zhao的推文下進行，他宣布Binance將以“最近的啟示”為例，以清算其FTT持股。根據FTX的說法，該推文引發了一波客戶的提款，並幫助平台上的平台上的邊緣傾斜。

But Binance says the tweet was based on public information – specifically the CoinDesk article that exposed Alameda’s shaky finances – and they’re not buying the idea that a single post caused the collapse. The motion argues there’s nothing to suggest Zhao was lying or trying to tank FTX.

但是Binance表示，這條推文是基於公共信息 - 特別是揭露了阿拉米達（Alameda）搖搖欲墜的財務狀況的Coindesk文章 - 他們並沒有買到一個帖子導致崩潰的想法。該議案認為，沒有什麼可以暗示Zhao在撒謊或試圖打擊FTX。

“The November 2022 tweets were posted in the days following a bombshell report by CoinDesk that blew the lid off of FTX’s facade, and the complaint contains no facts to suggest that the tweets were false or that any of the statements in the tweets were material or substantial,” Binance wrote, defending the tweets.

“ 2022年11月的推文是在科德斯克（Coindesk）的重磅炸彈報告後的幾天發布的，該報告炸毀了FTX外牆的蓋子，投訴沒有事實表明這些推文是虛假的，或者推文中的任何聲明都是物質或實質性的，” Binance寫道，辯護，辯護。

The filing continues: “Indeed, the tweets were patently responsive to a significant public development—the CoinDesk article about Alameda Research’s risky and under-capitalized operations.”

該文件繼續說：“的確，這些推文顯然對一個重大的公共發展做出了反應，這是Coindesk關於阿拉米達研究的風險和資本不足的文章。”

Furthermore, Binance says the case shouldn’t even be heard in a U.S. court as its corporate entities aren’t based in the States and didn’t handle the transfers directly. The filing also leans on safe-harbor rules and says state-level claims don’t belong in bankruptcy court.

此外，Binance表示，該案甚至不應該在美國法院審理，因為其公司實體不在美國，也沒有直接處理轉讓。該文件還依靠避風港規則，並說州級索賠不屬於破產法院。

For now, Binance wants the whole case tossed out. FTX, meanwhile, is continuing its broader effort to claw back billions in assets and is preparing to pay out $5 billion to creditors in a second round of repayments starting May 30.

就目前而言，Binance希望整個案件都拋棄。同時，FTX正在繼續更廣泛的努力，以減少數十億美元的資產，並準備在5月30日的第二輪還款中向債權人支付50億美元。