市值: $2.9781T 0.330%
體積(24小時): $65.5351B -38.300%
  • 市值: $2.9781T 0.330%
  • 體積(24小時): $65.5351B -38.300%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $2.9781T 0.330%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$94909.036719 USD

1.86%

ethereum
ethereum

$1805.287443 USD

3.16%

tether
tether

$1.000610 USD

0.02%

xrp
xrp

$2.192939 USD

0.69%

bnb
bnb

$602.949957 USD

0.43%

solana
solana

$151.863311 USD

0.35%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$1.000031 USD

0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.187217 USD

4.41%

cardano
cardano

$0.723513 USD

2.30%

tron
tron

$0.243207 USD

-0.10%

sui
sui

$3.617348 USD

8.73%

chainlink
chainlink

$15.150138 USD

2.18%

avalanche
avalanche

$22.760275 USD

3.89%

stellar
stellar

$0.289607 USD

4.92%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000015 USD

6.88%

加密貨幣新聞文章

Binance Fails to Convince US Supreme Court to Hear Its Appeal in Crypto Lawsuit

2025/01/14 02:13

Binance Fails to Convince US Supreme Court to Hear Its Appeal in Crypto Lawsuit

Key Takeaways

Binance's effort to block a lawsuit that accuses it of illegally selling crypto assets has hit a roadblock after the US Supreme Court declined to hear its appeal, Bloomberg Law reported.

The lawsuit, filed in 2020, alleges that a group of Binance investors were not warned by the crypto exchange about the risks involved in several tokens, including ELF, EOS, and FUN, which they purchased in 2017. The investors are seeking compensation for their losses, as well as interest and legal costs.

Binance has argued that it should not be subject to US securities laws because it is not a US-based company.

A US district court initially dismissed the case in March 2022, ruling in favor of Binance's argument that US securities laws did not apply because the transactions were considered "extraterritorial" and some claims were filed too late.

But an appeals court later reversed that decision, finding that there was enough evidence to suggest that the transactions were domestic, based on the location of servers and the investors' activities within the US, according to a public document shared by Bloomberg Law.

Following the decision, Binance and its former CEO, Changpeng Zhao, appealed to the Supreme Court. They argued that the 2nd Circuit misapplied the 2010 Morrison v National Australia Bank decision by permitting liability across different stages of securities transactions and countries.

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年04月27日 其他文章發表於