Market Cap: $2.6808T -0.35%
Volume(24h): $47.5786B -12.97%
  • Market Cap: $2.6808T -0.35%
  • Volume(24h): $47.5786B -12.97%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.6808T -0.35%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$79988.989401 USD

-0.64%

ethereum
ethereum

$2316.894075 USD

-1.19%

tether
tether

$0.998584 USD

-0.01%

bnb
bnb

$738.395053 USD

-0.70%

xrp
xrp

$1.283651 USD

-1.24%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999825 USD

0.00%

solana
solana

$100.818409 USD

-0.74%

tron
tron

$0.329976 USD

0.41%

zcash
zcash

$1207.290303 USD

1.39%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$76.285857 USD

0.21%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.076782 USD

-0.20%

monero
monero

$584.415523 USD

-3.57%

chainlink
chainlink

$11.368885 USD

-0.07%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.034908 USD

-0.01%

cardano
cardano

$0.202264 USD

-1.47%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

XLM, HBAR, ADA Networks Push SEC for Clear Commodity Rules Amid Digital Asset Classification Debate

Oct 22, 2026 at 04:05 am

Stellar, Hedera, and Cardano are urging the SEC to establish durable commodity rules for digital assets, seeking regulatory clarity beyond Bitcoin's status.

XLM, HBAR, ADA Networks Push SEC for Clear Commodity Rules Amid Digital Asset Classification Debate

New York, NY - The digital asset landscape is buzzing with calls for regulatory clarity, as the networks behind Stellar (XLM), Hedera (HBAR), and Cardano (ADA) are collectively petitioning the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to codify definitive commodity classification rules. This concerted effort aims to secure a predictable regulatory environment, akin to the established status of Bitcoin, for these prominent digital assets.

The Push for Durable Rules

At the heart of this initiative is a demand for the SEC to move beyond ad hoc enforcement actions and toward published, lasting rules that clearly define digital assets as commodities. For XLM, HBAR, and ADA, such classification would draw a crucial distinction from assets that could be deemed unregistered securities, offering much-needed certainty for their respective ecosystems.

Bitcoin has long held a unique position, recognized by both the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the SEC as a commodity. This established status has paved the way for significant developments, including the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs. The proponents of XLM, HBAR, and ADA argue that their continued ambiguity in regulatory classification hinders compliance planning and limits crucial institutional investment.

Why Commodity Treatment Matters

The quest for clear commodity treatment is driven by practical considerations impacting compliance, market participation, and overall ecosystem confidence.

Compliance and Market Access

For exchanges and custodians, a stable legal framework is essential before listing new assets. The ongoing enforcement actions against certain digital assets create a chilling effect across the market. For Hedera (HBAR), this uncertainty impacts not only exchange listings but also enterprise-level deployments, as financial institutions need to confidently treat HBAR as a commodity.

Institutional Demand and Ecosystem Growth

The emergence of spot HBAR ETF products signals existing institutional interest, but sustained growth hinges on the legal certainty that formal rulemaking provides. Similarly, Cardano's (ADA) ecosystem, with its growing decentralized applications and staking rewards, faces significant tax and compliance questions. Clear commodity rules would resolve ambiguities for developers, validators, and stakers alike.

For Stellar (XLM), the implications extend to cross-border payment infrastructure. Commodity classification would simplify integration for regulated money-transfer operators, enabling XLM-based settlements without triggering complex securities compliance obligations.

The Road Ahead

While the networks behind XLM, HBAR, and ADA are actively advocating for these rules through public comments and direct engagement, it's important to note that the SEC has not yet issued a formal commodity classification for these assets. The process for formal SEC rulemaking involves proposed rules, public comment periods, and final adoption, none of which have been confirmed for this specific initiative.

Key developments to watch include the SEC's issuance of proposed rules, the specific criteria for commodity treatment, and which assets might be included. Congressional actions, such as legislation assigning primary jurisdiction over commodity-like digital assets to the CFTC, could also achieve a similar outcome through a different regulatory channel.

The regulatory standing of Bitcoin serves as a benchmark, but achieving similar clarity for networks like XLM, HBAR, and ADA requires navigating a rulemaking process that Bitcoin did not face. The outcome of this debate is poised to shape the compliance architecture of U.S. digital asset markets for years to come.

So, while the regulatory wheels may turn slowly, the ongoing dialogue is a positive sign for those hoping for a clearer path forward in the exciting world of digital assets!

Original source:coinmarketcap

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Oct 27, 2026