Market Cap: $3.3826T 2.180%
Volume(24h): $148.9806B -17.570%
  • Market Cap: $3.3826T 2.180%
  • Volume(24h): $148.9806B -17.570%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.3826T 2.180%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$103543.459369 USD

1.56%

ethereum
ethereum

$2633.470092 USD

7.94%

tether
tether

$0.999999 USD

-0.02%

xrp
xrp

$2.549560 USD

3.65%

bnb
bnb

$662.515805 USD

2.61%

solana
solana

$179.658185 USD

6.08%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999912 USD

-0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.237120 USD

6.88%

cardano
cardano

$0.816978 USD

3.56%

tron
tron

$0.272018 USD

3.15%

sui
sui

$3.964909 USD

2.47%

chainlink
chainlink

$17.197951 USD

5.41%

avalanche
avalanche

$26.135043 USD

9.60%

stellar
stellar

$0.309763 USD

2.83%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000016 USD

5.75%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

"Ripple Withdraws Its Cross-Appeal "

Mar 26, 2025 at 07:36 pm

"Ripple's legal battle against the US Securities and Exchange Commission has reached its final stage, as the cryptocurrency company has withdrawn its cross-appeal in the SEC case."

"Ripple Withdraws Its Cross-Appeal "

Since the SEC legal battle against Coinbase was settled, there have been speculations that the legal battle between the SEC and Ripple might also be settled soon.

Now, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse’s announcement about his company’s decision to withdraw its cross-appeal in the ongoing case with the SEC confirms that the legal battle has reached its final stage.

The SEC, through Judge Analisa Torres, had secured an injunction against Ripple, restricting the company from selling XRP tokens to institutional players directly.

The ruling by Judge Analisa Torres in the US District Court in the Southern District of New York determined that during the period from 2013 to 2019, portions of Ripple’s institutional sales constituted an unregistered securities offering. However, the judge decided that the crypto company’s sales of XRP through programmable contracts were not deemed to be investment contracts.

The SEC had instituted an action against Ripple in December 2020, alleging that the crypto company sold XRP without registering its offerings as required by federal securities laws.

After a three-year legal battle, Judge Torres ruled in April that portions of Ripple’s institutional sales fell under the ambit of investment contracts, which are subject to registration with the SEC. However, the judge determined that the crypto company’s sales of XRP through programmable contracts were not deemed to be investment contracts.

Following this ruling, the SEC applied for a summary judgment, which was granted by Judge Torres.

After the summary judgment was made, both the SEC and Ripple applied for an appeal against Judge Analisa Torres’s ruling.

Now, Garlinghouse has announced that the crypto company is withdrawing its cross-appeal, rendering the SEC’s appeal the final stage of this legal battle.

If the SEC requests the court to cancel the injunction against Ripple and the request is granted, the crypto company will be able to commence institutional sales again.

After Judge Analisa Torres ruled in April that portions of Ripple’s institutional sales fell under the ambit of investment contracts, the SEC applied for a summary judgment, which was granted by Judge Torres.

After the summary judgment was made, both the SEC and Ripple applied for an appeal against Judge Analisa Torres’s ruling.

Now, Garlinghouse has announced that the crypto company is withdrawing its cross-appeal, rendering the SEC’s appeal the final stage of this legal battle.

If the SEC requests the court to cancel the injunction against Ripple and the request is granted, the crypto company will be able to commence institutional sales again.

According to Rispoli, the injunction, which was secured by the SEC and placed on Ripple, has affected the crypto company severely.

The ruling by Judge Analisa Torres in the US District Court in the Southern District of New York determined that during the period from 2013 to 2019, portions of Ripple’s institutional sales constituted an unregistered securities offering. However, the judge decided that the crypto company’s sales of XRP through programmable contracts were not deemed to be investment contracts.

The SEC had instituted an action against Ripple in December 2020, alleging that the crypto company sold XRP without registering its offerings as required by federal securities laws.

After a three-year legal battle, Judge Torres ruled in April that portions of Ripple’s institutional sales fell under the ambit of investment contracts, which are subject to registration with the SEC. However, the judge determined that the crypto company’s sales of XRP through programmable contracts were not deemed to be investment contracts.

According to Rispoli, the injunction, which was secured by the SEC and placed on Ripple, has affected the crypto company severely.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on May 14, 2025