Market Cap: $3.2982T 0.660%
Volume(24h): $66.2319B -30.960%
  • Market Cap: $3.2982T 0.660%
  • Volume(24h): $66.2319B -30.960%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.2982T 0.660%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$107335.400817 USD

0.17%

ethereum
ethereum

$2432.477879 USD

0.51%

tether
tether

$1.000329 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.189906 USD

0.50%

bnb
bnb

$648.517225 USD

0.48%

solana
solana

$149.879731 USD

4.71%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999922 USD

0.00%

tron
tron

$0.275235 USD

0.65%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.163079 USD

0.78%

cardano
cardano

$0.564970 USD

0.78%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$37.700927 USD

2.59%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$493.484698 USD

-1.58%

sui
sui

$2.788562 USD

3.33%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.329518 USD

1.52%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.121855 USD

0.59%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Pi Network Labeled as 2025's Biggest Rug Pull After a 12 Million Token Dump Crashes the Price by 50%

May 22, 2025 at 05:30 pm

Crypto analyst Atlas has labeled Pi Network as 2025's biggest rug pull after a 12 million token dump crashed Pi's price by 50%.

Pi Network Labeled as 2025's Biggest Rug Pull After a 12 Million Token Dump Crashes the Price by 50%

Crypto analyst Atlas has labeled Pi Network (PI) as 2025’s biggest rug pull after a 12 million-token dump crashed the price by 50%. The anonymous sell-off occurred just days after Pi surged to $1.60 on speculation, sparking allegations of insider manipulation.

On Monday, May 15, an onchain analyst and critic known as Atlas on X claimed that while users were being teased with a new upgrade, Pi Network insiders were making their move. To support his rug claim, which he has been making since late February, Atlas referenced a probe by Dr. Picoin, whose findings allegedly linked the token dump to the Pi Network core team.

As previously reported by Bitcoin.com News, Pi’s rally in early May briefly pushed the token into the top 20 digital assets by market capitalization. At the time, its surge was attributed to rumors of a possible Binance listing and a major announcement set for May 14.

However, after the announcement turned out to be nothing more than the launch of a $100 million investment fund, Pi plunged by more than 25% in 24 hours. The sudden decline prompted allegations from some Pi Network supporters, who accused the core team of deliberately hyping the project to inflate the token’s price.

One supporter criticized the team’s decision to build hype around a single announcement, which he said could backfire if it failed to meet the community’s expectations.

Since then, Pi Network has faced increasing scrutiny, especially as the token has continued trading well below its May 12 price of just under $1.60. At 4:45 a.m. EST on May 20, Pi was changing hands at $0.738, down 33% over seven days.

Atlas, meanwhile, claimed an analysis had identified the dumping wallet, which is allegedly linked to the Pi Network core team.

“The wallet in question—GABT7EMP—is allegedly connected to Pi Core ops. Millions of PI flowed out from this address right near the local top. PSCAN shows massive outflows just as the price began dumping. To many, this looks like a textbook insider exit during peak liquidity.”

Although the Pi Network core team has not responded to the allegations on X, a pro-Pi Network handle appeared to address some of the concerns about the movement of massive amounts of Pi tokens.

“The Pi Core Team manages numerous wallets for different operational purposes. These wallets are used for various functions, including ecosystem development funding, exchange liquidity provision, strategic partnerships, operational expenses, and community rewards and incentives,” Times of Pi Network wrote in a post on X.

Earlier this year, rumors swirled that Binance was planning to list Pi, and some reports claimed the exchange was in the final stages of integration. However, despite the speculation, Binance never announced any intention to list Pi.

Meanwhile, Atlas also rejected claims that the fund transfers were merely part of a testnet-to-mainnet migration. The analyst argued that if this were the case, it should have been communicated more effectively to dispel pump-and-dump suspicions.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Jun 29, 2025