Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
Volume(24h): $157.21B 50.24%
Fear & Greed Index:

38 - Fear

  • Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
  • Volume(24h): $157.21B 50.24%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top Cryptospedia

Select Language

Select Language

Select Currency

Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos

What are PPLNS and PPS Payouts? How to Choose a Pool Based on its Payment Scheme?

PPLNS rewards miners based on recent shares in a rolling window—encouraging loyalty but increasing short-term variance—while PPS offers stable, fee-adjusted payouts per share, shifting risk to the pool.

Dec 10, 2025 at 10:19 am

Understanding PPLNS Payouts

1. PPLNS stands for Pay Per Last N Shares, a reward distribution model used by mining pools to allocate block rewards among participants based on the number of valid shares submitted within a rolling window.

2. The 'N' in PPLNS refers to a configurable number of recent shares, often defined in terms of time or share count, and resets only after a block is found.

3. This method discourages pool hopping because miners who join late or leave early receive proportionally less, while consistent contributors benefit from higher effective payouts over time.

4. Variability in earnings is higher under PPLNS compared to fixed-rate models, as short-term luck and participation timing directly influence returns.

5. Some pools implement decay factors or share aging mechanisms, where older shares within the N-window contribute less weight to final payout calculations.

Understanding PPS Payouts

1. PPS stands for Pay Per Share, a payout scheme where miners receive an immediate, fixed reward for every valid share they submit, regardless of whether the pool finds a block.

2. The fixed rate is calculated using the current network difficulty, block reward, and estimated transaction fee revenue, minus the pool’s operational fee.

3. Miners bear no variance risk—earnings are stable and predictable, making PPS ideal for those prioritizing income consistency over potential upside.

4. Because the pool assumes all block-finding risk, it typically charges a higher fee than PPLNS pools to cover expected losses during dry spells.

5. PPS pools must maintain strong liquidity reserves to honor payouts even during extended periods without confirmed blocks.

Comparing Risk and Reward Profiles

1. PPLNS introduces statistical variance: miners may earn significantly more than expected during lucky streaks but face zero payout during prolonged droughts if their shares fall outside the active window.

2. PPS eliminates variance at the miner level but transfers full financial exposure to the pool operator, which can affect long-term pool sustainability during extreme market downturns.

3. Historical data shows that over 30+ days, well-tuned PPLNS schemes often deliver 2–5% higher average returns than PPS, assuming constant hashrate and no hopping behavior.

4. PPS becomes comparatively less attractive when block reward halvings reduce base incentives, as fee-based revenue becomes more volatile and harder to model accurately.

5. Network congestion spikes can inflate transaction fee estimates used in PPS calculations, leading to temporary overpayment or underpayment depending on actual mempool clearance rates.

How Pool Fees Interact With Payment Models

1. A 1.5% fee on a PPLNS pool may effectively translate to ~2.8% reduction in long-term yield due to compounding effects of share weighting and window dynamics.

2. PPS fees are applied directly to the per-share rate, meaning a 2% fee reduces each payout by that exact percentage before distribution.

3. Some pools advertise “zero fee” PPLNS but offset costs through delayed payouts, minimum threshold increases, or hidden latency penalties on share acceptance.

4. Fee structures become especially critical when evaluating pools supporting multiple coins—cross-chain PPS calculations often rely on outdated exchange rates, introducing settlement risk.

5. Transparent pools publish real-time fee breakdowns including orphan penalty adjustments, stale share deductions, and protocol overhead surcharges.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Does PPLNS guarantee higher earnings than PPS over one week?Not necessarily. Short-term outcomes depend heavily on block find timing and individual share timing relative to the N-window. One week is statistically insufficient to observe meaningful convergence.

Q: Can I switch between PPLNS and PPS within the same pool?Most pools lock users into a single payment scheme per account or worker configuration. Hybrid models exist but require explicit opt-in and often involve separate wallet addresses.

Q: How do stale shares impact PPLNS payouts?Stale shares—those submitted after a block has been found—are usually discarded entirely in PPLNS, reducing effective contribution without warning. Their rejection rate correlates with network propagation delay and pool infrastructure quality.

Q: Are PPS payouts taxable at the moment of receipt or upon coin sale?Tax treatment depends on jurisdiction, but many regulatory bodies classify PPS rewards as ordinary income at the time of receipt, valued at fair market price in local currency.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Related knowledge

See all articles

User not found or password invalid

Your input is correct