Uniswap 冷落其 DAO

首先，Uniswap Labs 宣布了 Unichain。然后它的 DAO 遇到了问题。

Uniswap governance delegates, who are supposed to be in control of major decisions involving the Uniswap protocol, say they were left in the dark about the launch of Unichain.

Uniswap 治理代表本应控制涉及 Uniswap 协议的重大决策，但他们表示，他们对 Unichain 的推出一无所知。

The firm behind the $5 billion decentralised exchange announced Unichain on Monday.

这家价值 50 亿美元的去中心化交易所背后的公司周一宣布推出 Unichain。

The protocol is being marketed by Uniswap Labs as Uniswap’s answer to the growing trend of Ethereum layer 2s.

Uniswap Labs 正在推广该协议，作为 Uniswap 针对以太坊第 2 层不断增长趋势的回应。

But according to Gao, key decisions with wide-ranging impacts, such as what underlying technology Unichain will use, were made behind closed doors.

但高表示，具有广泛影响的关键决策，例如 Unichain 将使用什么底层技术，都是闭门做出的。

“It calls to question (once again) how decentralized UNI governance actually is,” Gao said on X.

高在 X 上表示：“这（再次）让人质疑 UNI 治理实际上是如何去中心化的。”

“This is something anyone can do, permissionlessly,” Mario Zavala, founder of DeFi analytics platform Revert, said in response to Gao.

“这是任何人都可以在未经许可的情况下做的事情，”DeFi 分析平台 Revert 的创始人 Mario Zavala 在回应高时表示。

“Uniswap Labs had no obligation to privately inform the delegate.”

“Uniswap 实验室没有义务私下通知代表。”

Uniswap launched the UNI token in September 2020. The launch of UNI “officially enshrines Uniswap as publicly-owned and self-sustainable infrastructure” and helps protect the protocol’s autonomous qualities, Uniswap said in a blog post.

Uniswap 于 2020 年 9 月推出了 UNI 代币。Uniswap 在一篇博客文章中表示，UNI 的推出“正式将 Uniswap 视为公有且自我可持续的基础设施”，并有助于保护该协议的自治品质。

Some, however, have defended Uniswap Labs’ actions.

然而，一些人为 Uniswap Labs 的行为进行了辩护。

“This is something anyone can do, permissionlessly,” Mario Zavala, founder of DeFi analytics platform Revert, said in response to Gao.

“这是任何人都可以在未经许可的情况下做的事情，”DeFi 分析平台 Revert 的创始人 Mario Zavala 在回应高时表示。

“Uniswap Labs had no obligation to privately inform the delegate.”

“Uniswap 实验室没有义务私下通知代表。”

World Liberty Financial flops

世界自由金融失败

When Donald Trump’s World Liberty Financial launched its token sale last week, it had a lofty goal: Raise $450 million.

当唐纳德·特朗普的 World Liberty Financial 上周启动代币销售时，它有一个崇高的目标：筹集 4.5 亿美元。

A week later, and the DeFi project hasn’t even come close. So far, it has raised just $14 million.

一周后，DeFi 项目还差得远。到目前为止，它仅筹集了 1400 万美元。

Small print in World Liberty’s documentation reveals that Trump and others who stand to benefit financially from the project could end up empty handed.

世界自由组织文件中的小字显示，特朗普和其他有望从该项目中获得经济利益的人最终可能会两手空空。

Critics say the situation was predictable.

批评人士称，这种情况是可以预见的。

World Liberty valued itself at around $1.5 billion, a huge figure considering the project hasn’t even launched yet.

World Liberty 的估值约为 15 亿美元，考虑到该项目尚未启动，这是一个巨大的数字。

At the same time, the WLFI tokens the project is selling aren’t tradable, and there’s no guarantee they ever will be.

与此同时，该项目正在出售的 WLFI 代币不可交易，而且也不能保证它们永远可以交易。

When there’s no potential to make money, many in crypto just aren’t interested.

当没有赚钱的潜力时，许多人对加密货币就不感兴趣。

Whales tip Polymarket odds

鲸鱼提示Polymarket赔率

Donald Trump’s election odds have been climbing on crypto betting site Polymarket.

在加密货币博彩网站 Polymarket 上，唐纳德·特朗普的选举赔率一直在攀升。

Vice President Kamala Harris may have a two-point lead in national polls, but the betting platform gives Trump a big lead — Harris bets cost only 37 cents, implying a 37% chance of a win.

副总统卡马拉·哈里斯在全国民意调查中可能领先两分，但博彩平台却让特朗普大幅领先——哈里斯的投注成本仅为 37 美分，意味着获胜的几率为 37%。

The shift is mostly due to a handful of large bettors skewing the odds.

这种转变主要是由于少数大型投注者扭曲了赔率。

Four accounts have nearly $35 million in pro-Republican trades. Given the low liquidity, it’s been enough to distort sentiment surrounding the election.

四个账户有近 3500 万美元的亲共和党交易。鉴于流动性较低，这足以扭曲围绕选举的情绪。

“It’s about the depth of the market,” Jake Dwyer, founder of venture fund The Factor Corp, told DL News. “If the market interest exclusively exists at a tight range, as soon as you want to buy a big amount, you find there’s no size offers.”

“这与市场的深度有关，”风险投资基金 The Factor Corp 的创始人 Jake Dwyer 告诉 DL News。 “如果市场兴趣只存在于狭窄的范围内，那么一旦你想大量购买，你就会发现没有尺寸报价。”

This week in DeFi governance

本周 DeFi 治理

VOTE: Stargate DAO mulls bridge deployment on Unichain

投票：Stargate DAO 考虑在 Unichain 上部署桥接器

VOTE: Arbitrum DAO votes against token swap pilot proposal

投票：Arbitrum DAO 投票反对代币交换试点提案

VOTE: Uniswap DAO votes on revised onboarding proposal for Forse as a data service provider

投票：Uniswap DAO 对 Forse 作为数据服务提供商的修订加入提案进行投票

Post of the week

本周帖子

DefiLlama’s 0xngmi weighs in on what could happen to Polymarket’s total value locked when bets for the US presidential election resolve.

DefiLlama 的 0xngmi 权衡了当美国总统大选的赌注解决时 Polymarket 锁定的总价值可能会发生什么。

For those curious about what's gonna happen to polymarket after the election, here's the TVL of augur (the leading prediction market back then) during the 2021 US election, a lot of TVL left but usage remained higher than before pic.twitter.com/uMa7dTENxA

对于那些好奇选举后 Polymarket 会发生什么的人，这是 2021 年美国大选期间 augur（当时领先的预测市场）的 TVL，留下了大量 TVL，但使用量仍然高于之前 pic.twitter.com/uMa7dTENxA

For those curious about what's gonna happen to polymarket after the election, here's the TVL of augur (the leading prediction market back then) during the 2021 US election, a lot of TVL left but usage remained higher than before pic.twitter.com/uMa7dTENxA

对于那些好奇选举后 Polymarket 会发生什么的人，这是 2021 年美国大选期间 augur（当时领先的预测市场）的 TVL，留下了大量 TVL，但使用量仍然高于之前 pic.twitter.com/uMa7dTENxA

Got a tip about DeFi? Reach out at tim@dlnews.com.

有关于 DeFi 的建议吗？请通过 tim@dlnews.com 联系。