Stablecoin Bill，制度学家和“帝国罢工”时刻

分析伊丽莎白·沃伦（Elizabeth Warren）这样的制度化主义者的角色，分析了稳定的法案，以及它与加密货币行业的“帝国反击”时刻相似。

Hold onto your hats, crypto enthusiasts! The stablecoin bill saga continues, and it's shaping up to be a real nail-biter. Senator Elizabeth Warren and her fellow institutionalists aren't backing down, but is their regulatory push actually clearing the path for crypto's next big move?

抓住您的帽子，加密爱好者！ Stablecoin Bill Saga继续进行，它正在成为一个真正的指甲。参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦（Elizabeth Warren）和她的同胞制度主义者并没有退缩，但是他们的监管推动力实际上是在为加密货币的下一个大举动扫清了道路吗？

Warren's War on Crypto: A Regulatory Blitzkrieg

沃伦（Warren）的加密战争：监管闪电战

Remember 2021? Crypto-America was in the doldrums, facing a barrage of lawsuits and heavy-handed legislation. The infamous “DeFi Broker Rule” demanded the impossible: protocols and node operators collecting the names and addresses of every wallet holder. It felt like a deliberate attempt to sabotage the burgeoning crypto industry.

还记得2021吗？加密裔美国人处于低迷状态，面临着一系列诉讼和严格的立法。臭名昭著的“ Defi Broker规则”要求不可能：协议和节点操作员收集每个钱包持有人的姓名和地址。感觉就像是为破坏新兴加密行业的故意尝试。

The GENIUS Act: A Stablecoin Showdown

天才法：稳定摊牌

Now, Warren's sights are set on the GENIUS Act. Her strategy? Deploying every regulatory scare tactic imaginable. One particularly menacing amendment sought to burden stablecoin issuers with monitoring and reporting every illicit transaction downstream – forever! While not impossible, the absurdity of holding currency issuers accountable for every future crime involving their tokens is mind-boggling.

现在，沃伦（Warren）的视线是根据《天才法》（Genius Act）的。她的策略？部署每个可以想象的监管恐慌策略。一项特别险恶的修正案试图负担稳定的发行人来监视和报告下游的每项非法交易 - 永远！虽然并非不可能，但持有货币发行人对涉及令牌的每一个犯罪负责的荒谬是令人难以置信的。

Dollar Hegemony vs. Big Bank Advantage

美元霸权与大银行优势

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand recognized the need for dollar-denominated stablecoins to compete with the yuan and renminbi. But who really benefits from Warren's overreach? Big banks, armed with legions of compliance lawyers, thrive when smaller, crypto-native competitors are suffocated. It seems Warren inadvertently arms these Goliaths with regulatory weapons.

参议员基尔斯滕·吉利布兰（Kirsten Gillibrand）认识到有必要以美元计价的稳定人与人民币和人民币竞争。但是，谁真的从沃伦的超越中受益？大型银行拥有大量合规律师，当较小的加密本地竞争对手被窒息而蓬勃发展。沃伦似乎无意中用监管武器将这些巨人武装起来。

The Institutionalists' Gambit: A Calculated Maneuver?

制度学家的gambit：一个计算的机动？

Warren's actions aren't random technophobia; they're deliberate institutional maneuvers aimed at controlling the narrative and preserving power. By exposing their hand, the institutionalists may have inadvertently cleared the bases for crypto's next big inning. Instead of killing the stablecoin bill, the environment is now set for more innovation in crypto.

沃伦的行动不是随机的技术恐惧症。他们是故意的机构演习，旨在控制叙事和维护能力。通过揭露他们的手，制度主义者可能无意中清除了Crypto下一局的基础。现在，环境将在加密货币中进行更多创新，而不是杀死稳定的法案。

A Glimmer of Hope: Crypto's 'Empire Strikes Back' Moment

希望：加密的“帝国罢工”时刻

So, is this the 'Empire Strikes Back' moment for crypto? Perhaps. The challenges are real, but the crypto community is resilient. Instead of succumbing to regulatory pressure, this could be the catalyst for innovation and growth. Keep an eye on the stablecoin bill – the next chapter in this saga is sure to be a wild ride!

那么，这是加密货币的“帝国反击”时刻？也许。挑战是真实的，但是加密货币社区具有弹性。这可能是创新和增长的催化剂，而不是屈服于监管压力。请密切关注Stablecoin法案 - 这个传奇的下一章一定会很疯狂！