![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
加密货币新闻
SC: If disciplining children results in harming their dignity, it is considered child abuse
2025/01/10 01:38
The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that disciplining children in a manner that harms their dignity is considered child abuse, based on a decision made last year and promulgated on 9 January.
In a decision penned by Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez and dated 22 July 2024, the SC’s Second Division upheld the conviction of a father for child abuse after he subjected his 12-year-old daughter and 10-year-old son to violent and excessive discipline.
Court records showed that the father from 2017 to 2018 beat his children, kicking his daughter, pulling her hair, striking her with a wooden rod with a nail, hitting them with a dustpan, and cursing at them repeatedly.
He claimed these actions were meant to discipline his children for misbehavior, such as failing to eat lunch and losing money from their coin banks.
The father was found guilty by a Regional Trial Court (RTC) and the Court of Appeals (CA) for violating Republic Act 7610, or the Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act.
Under Section 3(b) of RA 7610, any act that debases, degrades, or demeans a child’s dignity is considered child abuse.
The father appealed to the SC, arguing that he had no intention of harming his children’s dignity.
However, the SC ruled that his actions went beyond reasonable discipline, showing a clear intent to harm the children’s dignity.
While parents have the right to discipline their children, such measures must not be violent, excessive, or disproportionate to their misbehavior, the SC said.
It noted that without this specific intent, the offender cannot be held liable for child abuse but can be charged with other crimes under the Revised Penal Code (RPC).
The father was sentenced to four to six years in prison and fined P45,000. He was also ordered to pay his children P180,000 in damages.
The court reiterated that disciplining children, if it results in physical injuries, does not automatically amount to child abuse.
For such acts to be considered abuse, there must be a clear intent to harm a child’s dignity, it explained.
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
-
-
- 比特币崩溃手表:玻璃节信号潜在的冷却阶段
- 2025-09-26 19:45:12
- 比特币是否要进行更深入的更正?玻璃节数据表明,长期持有人正在获取利润,ETF流入也减慢了。冷却阶段可能在前面。
-
-
- 比特币的缓慢磨碎:加密市场是否为爆发进行了准备?
- 2025-09-26 19:30:52
- 比特币最近的价格停顿使一些交易者不安。但是,这是“慢磨”的迹象,还是加密周期的自然部分?
-
-
- 旋转轮子,筹款活动和加密货币牵引力:连接是什么?
- 2025-09-26 19:09:20
- 探索传统筹款,社区支持与快节奏的加密货币和模因硬币之间的令人惊讶的联系。
-
- 代币化的斯特林飞行:英国金融和银行飞行员福克
- 2025-09-26 19:05:05
- 英国财务带头长率的英国股票飞行员,拥有主要银行,探索付款,预防欺诈和和解的福利。这是英国金融的未来吗?
-
- SEI令牌加密分析:在挥发性市场中导航支持水平
- 2025-09-26 18:49:22
- 在市场波动中,深入研究了SEI令牌的价格行动,主要支持水平和专家分析。反弹是在地平线上,还是下降趋势继续?