Satoshi论文：比特币及其基本哲学的新公开募股

这个故事结局不好。没有有原则的政治更新，源于自我主持的政治哲学的基本根源

This story does not end well. Without principled political renewal stemming from the fundamental root of a self-sovereign political philosophy, we should expect an intensification of surveillance and control and a normalization of war. We must actively choose liberty and peace if we are to thrive. There is no policy of total war, containment, or world policing that does not end in catastrophe.

这个故事结局不好。如果没有有原则的政治更新，我们应该期望对监视和控制以及战争的正常化的根本根源。如果我们要壮成长，我们必须积极选择自由与和平。没有彻底的战争，遏制或世界警务的政策不会终止于灾难。

For political sovereignty to have purchase, it must come from the ground up and be appropriately exercised in light of what can be expected of such a thing at various scales. This is a significant undertaking and not one that will be settled in any collection of essays, reinvigorated political parties, or technological capabilities. The ground up legitimacy of a politics worth its salt requires functioning societies and the sovereign individuals who bring them to life as heirs of tradition and agents of the future. The tension between tradition and science that fuels the progress of civilizations must be taken up seriously as the engine of renewal. New common knowledge adds to the common sense of a society. This often makes some prior arrangement inoperative, but in doing so, it opens up the possibility of transforming something that was simply taken for granted before.

为了购买政治主权，它必须从头开始，并根据各种规模的这种事情可以进行适当行使。这是一项重要的事业，而不是任何一本论文，重新活跃的政党或技术能力的事业。值得盐的政治合法性的基本合法性需要运作的社会和主权个人，他们将他们作为传统和未来的代理人的继承人栩栩如生。传统与科学之间的张力赋予文明的进步，必须认真对待作为更新的引擎。新的常识增加了社会的常识。这通常使一些先前的安排不起作用，但是这样做，它打开了改变以前被认为是理所当然的东西的可能性。

Satoshi Nakamoto’s 2008 white paper and 2009 code were assertions of individual sovereignty explicitly motivated by the banker bailouts of that era., They called the Banker Revolution into question by building a counter-infrastructure in the world and allowing the game theory behind its adoption to act as a social forcing function around matters of wage value, savings debasement, and the human right to transact. The open illustration of the supranational social infrastructure that is the BTC protocol and token is a Hayekian “sly roundabout” moment of possibility that creates and motivates common knowledge where previously there was none.,, This acts as a one-way door, removing the possibility of naïve participation in variously despotic systems functioning as self-evident norms. The removal of naïveté around such things as the Cantillon effect, sovereign-debt reserve assets, and the confidence games and social consensus around fiat currencies and their debasement necessarily moves populations toward common knowledge regarding the civic and civil systems of control that have become devastatingly effective in curtailing if not criminalizing essential liberty. If we are to avoid the worst ramifications of the return to aristocracy that has been underway since the 1970s, we must risk knowing these things and building what is next. That is what is at stake.

Satoshi Nakamoto的2008年白皮书和2009年的代码是对个人主权的主张，这是由银行家的救助那个时代明确激励的。他们通过在世界上建立反基础结构并允许其采用后的社交强迫围绕工资价值的事务，并允许人类的事务，并允许人类的事务，并允许人类的事务，并允许人类正确的事务，并允许人类的反基理论在世界上造成质疑。 BTC协议和令牌的超国家社会基础架构的开放说明是Hayekian的“狡猾的回旋处”时刻的时刻，可以创造和激励常识，而以前没有任何事物。围绕坎蒂隆效应，君主储备金资产以及围绕法定货币及其贬低的信心游戏和社会共识等事物的事物删除天真，而对公民和民间控制系统的共同知识一定会使人口朝着造成的公民和民用体系迈出，而这些系统在不限制犯罪的基本自由度方面变得有效。如果我们要避免自1970年代以来一直在进行的重返贵族的最糟糕后果，那么我们必须冒着知道这些东西并建立下一步的风险。那就是危及的。

The Satoshi Papers is now available in the Bitcoin Magazine Store – order the paperback today or pre-order the limited Library edition, shipping mid-June 2025.

Satoshi论文现在可在比特币杂志商店中找到 - 今天订购平装本或预订限量图书馆版，《运输》 2025年中期。

[37] Leo Strauss, “Philosophy as a Rigorous Science and Political Philosophy,” Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy 2, no. 1 (Summer 1971): 1—9.

[37] Leo Strauss，“作为严格的科学和政治哲学的哲学”，解释：《政治哲学杂志》 2，第1期。 1（1971年夏）：1-9。

[38] Satoshi Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,” 2008, https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

[38] Nakamoto Satoshi，“比特币：点对点电子现金系统”，2008年，https：//bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf。

[39] Joshua Davis, “The Crypto-Currency,” The New Yorker, October 3, 2011, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/03/the-crypto-currency.

[39]约书亚·戴维斯（Joshua Davis），“加密货币”，《纽约客》，2011年10月3日，https：//www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/2011/10/10/03/the-crypto-currency。

[40] “I don’t believe we shall ever have a good money again before we take the thing out of the hands of government, that is, we can’t take them violently out of the hands of government, all we can do is by some sly roundabout way introduce something they can’t stop.” See Friedrich Hayek, “F. A. Hayek: Monetary Policy, the Gold Standard, Deficits, Inflation, and John Maynard Keynes,” interview with James U. Blanchard III, University of Freiburg, May 1, 1984, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYhEDxFwFRU&t=1160s.

[40]“我不相信我们将在我们把事情拿出政府手中之前再有一笔钱，也就是说，我们不能从政府的手中猛烈地将它们拿出来，我们所能做的就是通过某种狡猾的回旋处介绍他们无法停止的东西。”参见Friedrich Hayek，“ FA Hayek：货币政策，黄金标准，赤字，通货膨胀和约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯”，《弗里布尔格大学詹姆斯·U·布兰查德三世》的采访，1984年5月1日，https：///www.youtube.com/www.youtube.com/watch？

[41] “Governments will never allow monetary competition, and even bankers do not understand the idea because they have all grown up in the system which is so completely dependent on central banks. So I think we need a roundabout way. After all, in the modern world, currency is no longer the most important money. Credit and credit cards are substitutes. While governments can stop people from issuing money, they can hardly stop them from opening accounts in something unless they introduce a complete system of exchange control. I expect that any bank will understand this idea. But I hope that one of the big dealers in raw materials will be prepared to open accounts which will be redeemable in so much of current moneys as are necessary to buy this list of raw materials. Through these accounts he can make his unit—call it the ‘solid’—the standard unit without it ever being used in circulation. People very soon will begin to keep their accounts in ‘solids’—the only thing which is trustworthy. Although it’s a thing where

[41]“政府将永远不会允许货币竞争，甚至银行家也不理解这个想法，因为他们在系统中的成长是如此完全取决于中央银行。因此，我认为我们需要一种环形交叉路口的方式。毕竟，在现代世界中，货币不再是最重要的货币。最重要的信用卡是替代的，否则他们可以替代他们，而他们却无法启动货币。任何银行都会理解这个想法，但我希望将原材料中的一位大型经销商在当前的许多货币中赎回，这是可以通过这些帐户来购买的，他可以使其成为“固体”。虽然这是