尽管裁定XRP本身不是安全性，但大多数数字资产不是证券

辛西娅·卢米斯（Cynthia Lummis）参议员是加密货币立法的倡导者，最近在X上指出，大多数数字资产不是Howey测试下的证券。

Senator Cynthia Lummis has sparked discussion on X about the status of digital assets as securities, drawing a response from attorney Bill Morgan.

参议员辛西娅·卢米斯（Cynthia Lummis）引发了X关于数字资产作为证券的地位的讨论，并提出了律师比尔·摩根（Bill Morgan）的回应。

Senator Cynthia Lummis, a Republican from Wyoming and a known advocate for cryptocurrency legislation, stated on X that "most" digital assets are not securities under the Howey test.

怀俄明州的共和党参议员辛西娅·卢米斯（Cynthia Lummis）也是X上的加密货币立法倡导者，他在X上指出，“大多数”数字资产不是Howey测试下的证券。

Her comments follow a congressional hearing on digital assets, where lawmakers touched upon the U.S.’s slow progress in establishing clear guidelines for the crypto industry, contrasting with the EU’s swift integration of crypto through MiCA.

她的评论是在国会关于数字资产的听证会之后，立法者在建立加密货币行业的明确指南方面涉及美国的进展缓慢，与欧盟通过MICA迅速整合了加密货币。

Lummis also highlighted the role of stablecoins in modernizing payments.

卢米斯还强调了稳定币在现代化付款中的作用。

However, her assertion that most cryptocurrencies are not securities has raised questions about the SEC’s approach to enforcement, particularly in its case against Ripple.

但是，她认为大多数加密货币不是证券的说法都提出了有关SEC执行方法的疑问，尤其是在针对Ripple的情况下。

The Interoperability Initiative and Judge Torres’ Ruling

互操作性倡议和托雷斯法官的裁决

Lummis’s statement comes amid efforts to promote interoperability between U.S. and foreign legal frameworks for crypto.

卢米斯（Lummis）的说法是为了促进加密货币与外国法律框架之间的互操作性的努力。

Earlier this year, a bipartisan group of senators, including Lummis and Democrat Tim Kapoli, introduced the Interoperability, Inclusion, and Innovation Centered (I3) Framework.

今年早些时候，包括卢米斯（Lummis）和民主党人蒂姆·卡普利（Tim Kapoli）在内的两党参议员介绍了以互操作性，包容性和创新为中心（i3）框架。

The initiative aims to streamline cooperation with trading partners in the digital asset space.

该计划旨在简化与数字资产领域的贸易合作伙伴的合作。

Lummis’s comments also follow Judge Analisa Torres’s ruling in July 2023 that XRP itself is not a security.

卢米斯（Lummis）的评论还遵循肛门托雷斯（Analisa Torres）法官在2023年7月的裁决，即XRP本身不是安全性。

Morgan Asks Lummis About Judge Torres’ Ruling

摩根向卢米斯询问托雷斯法官的裁决

In response to Lummis’s statement, attorney Bill Morgan, known for his work in the SEC v. Ripple case, asked if the senator agrees with Judge Torres’s ruling.

在回应卢米斯的声明时，律师比尔·摩根（Bill Morgan）因在Secv。Ripple案中的工作而闻名，他询问参议员是否同意托雷斯法官的裁决。

“Does Senator Lummis agree with Judge Torres’s ruling that XRP is not a security in the SEC v. Ripple case?”

“卢米斯参议员是否同意托雷斯法官的裁决，即XRP不是Secv。Ripple案中的安全？”

This question directly challenges the SEC’s claims that most cryptocurrencies are securities.

这个问题直接挑战了SEC关于大多数加密货币是证券的说法。

The judge’s ruling, which found that certain institutional sales by Ripple violated securities laws, has since been appealed by the SEC.

法官的裁决发现，波纹违反了证券法的某些机构销售，此后已向美国证券交易委员会提出上诉。

The agency is pushing for a broader interpretation of Section 77b(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 to include all digital assets sold to raise capital.

该机构正在推动对1933年《美国证券法》第77B（a）（1）条的更广泛解释，以包括出售用于筹集资金的所有数字资产。

This suggests that Lummis’s statement and Judge Torres’s ruling are part of a broader debate over the role of the SEC in the digital asset industry.

这表明卢米斯的声明和托雷斯法官的裁决是SEC在数字资产行业中的作用的更广泛辩论的一部分。

Lawmakers Push for Legislation to Define Legal Status

立法者推动立法来定义法律地位

The U.S. remains behind other countries in crypto regulation, with the EU forging ahead in implementing clear frameworks through initiatives such as MiCA.

美国仍在加密法规中的其他国家落后，欧盟通过诸如云母之类的计划实施了清晰的框架，欧盟在实施清晰的框架方面奠定了基础。

This lack of clear legislation has led to a regulatory gray zone, affecting crypto firms and stifling innovation.

缺乏明确的立法导致了一个监管灰色区域，影响了加密货币公司并扼杀创新。

Lawmakers, including Lummis, have repeatedly pushed for Congress to pass legislation to define the legal status of digital assets.

包括卢米斯在内的议员们一再敦促国会通过立法来定义数字资产的法律地位。

Lummis’s comments suggest support for a more streamlined approach to crypto regulation.

卢米斯（Lummis）的评论表明，支持更简化的加密法规方法。

This contrasts with the SEC’s actions under former chair Gary Gensler, which stated that many cryptocurrencies qualify as securities, leading to enforcement actions against several firms.

这与前董事长加里·金斯勒（Gary Gensler）领导下的美国证券交易委员会（SEC）的行动形成鲜明对比，后者指出，许多加密货币有资格为证券，导致对多家公司的执法行动。

This approach has sparked criticism for being overly broad and hindering crypto adoption.

这种方法引发了批评，因为它过分广泛和阻碍了加密货币。

The post Senator Lummis Says ‘Most' Digital Assets Are Not Securities, Sparking Discussion on Judge Torres’s Ruling appeared first on Coin Edition.

参议员卢米斯（Lummis）表示，“大多数”数字资产不是证券，引发了托雷斯法官裁决的讨论，首先出现在硬币版上。