美国检察官指控芒果市场价值 1.1 亿美元的诈骗和操纵行为

检察官指控 Avraham Eisenberg 对 Solana DEX 芒果市场 1.1 亿美元的利用类似于假钻戒骗局，涉及夸大的加密货币价值和欺骗性借贷行为。虽然艾森伯格声称他的行为是合法的交易策略，但他的律师辩称，他拿自己的资金冒险，而且交易是透明的。此案对加密货币监管的未来产生了潜在影响，专家们对使用 DeFi 协议进行市场操纵的合法性进行了争论。

Alleged $110 Million Mango Markets Exploit: Prosecutors Accuse Defendant of Fraud and Market Manipulation

涉嫌利用芒果市场 1.1 亿美元：检察官指控被告欺诈和操纵市场

In a Manhattan federal courtroom, prosecutors have launched their opening arguments against Avraham “Avi” Eisenberg, accusing him of orchestrating a $110 million exploit of the decentralized exchange Mango Markets. The allegations parallel a classic scam involving the sale of a fake diamond ring, according to United States Assistant Attorney Tian Huang.

在曼哈顿的联邦法庭上，检察官对 Avraham “Avi” Eisenberg 展开了开庭陈词，指控他策划了对去中心化交易所 Mango Markets 价值 1.1 亿美元的利用。美国助理检察官田黄表示，这些指控与涉及销售假钻戒的经典骗局类似。

Huang asserts that Eisenberg's actions on October 11, 2022, constitute clear-cut fraud and market manipulation, akin to a con artist who knowingly deceives unsuspecting individuals out of their money. By artificially inflating the price of cryptocurrency within a 20-minute span, Eisenberg allegedly persuaded Mango Markets to believe he possessed significant assets. Subsequently, he exploited this illusion to borrow over $110 million in cryptocurrency, which Huang contends was tantamount to theft.

黄坚称，艾森伯格在 2022 年 10 月 11 日的行为构成了明显的欺诈和市场操纵，类似于骗子故意欺骗毫无戒心的个人骗取钱财。据称，艾森伯格通过在 20 分钟内人为抬高加密货币的价格，说服 Mango Markets 相信他拥有大量资产。随后，他利用这种错觉借了超过 1.1 亿美元的加密货币，黄认为这相当于盗窃。

Eisenberg has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing, claiming that he was engaged in a legitimate trading strategy and that his actions were permitted under the terms of the platform's smart contract. His attorney, Sanford Talkin, defended his client's actions, emphasizing the significant financial risk Eisenberg assumed with his $13 million investment.

艾森伯格坚决否认有任何不当行为，声称他从事的是合法的交易策略，并且他的行为是平台智能合约条款允许的。他的律师桑福德·塔尔金 (Sanford Talkin) 为其委托人的行为进行了辩护，强调艾森伯格以其 1300 万美元的投资承担了巨大的财务风险。

Talkin argued that the trading strategy employed was not a sure bet and that the outcome could have resulted in the loss of all funds. Furthermore, he highlighted the transparent nature of the blockchain transactions, which allowed anyone to participate in the trade if they desired.

塔尔金认为，所采用的交易策略并不是一个确定的赌注，其结果可能会导致所有资金的损失。此外，他强调了区块链交易的透明性，任何人都可以根据需要参与交易。

In October 2022, Eisenberg allegedly manipulated the value of Mango Markets' native token, MNGO, relative to the stablecoin USD Coin (USDC). By doing so, he was able to secure a series of loans against the inflated MNGO price, depleting Mango Markets' treasury of approximately $110 million in various cryptocurrencies.

2022 年 10 月，艾森伯格涉嫌操纵 Mango Markets 的原生代币 MNGO 相对于稳定币美元硬币 (USDC) 的价值。通过这样做，他能够以虚高的 MNGO 价格获得一系列贷款，耗尽了 Mango Markets 约 1.1 亿美元的各种加密货币资金。

Days later, Mango Markets announced the recovery of $67 million in stolen crypto assets. Despite this partial restitution, Eisenberg's actions drew a lawsuit from the exchange, seeking damages and interest totaling $47 million.

几天后，Mango Markets 宣布追回 6700 万美元的被盗加密资产。尽管进行了部分赔偿，艾森伯格的行为还是引起了交易所的诉讼，要求赔偿总额为 4700 万美元的损失和利息。

Crypto Industry Implications

对加密行业的影响

Legal experts believe that the outcome of Eisenberg's case could have far-reaching consequences for the crypto industry, potentially eclipsing the significance of the ongoing criminal trial involving Sam Bankman-Fried. Gabriel Shapiro, a crypto lawyer and general counsel at Delphi Labs, acknowledges the government's allegations of market manipulation but disputes the assertion that Eisenberg breached any loan agreement.

法律专家认为，艾森伯格案件的结果可能会对加密行业产生深远的影响，可能会掩盖正在进行的涉及山姆·班克曼·弗里德 (Sam Bankman-Fried) 的刑事审判的重要性。德尔福实验室的加密货币律师兼总法律顾问加布里埃尔·夏皮罗（Gabriel Shapiro）承认政府对市场操纵的指控，但对艾森伯格违反任何贷款协议的说法提出异议。

Shapiro argues that such a claim is unfounded and incompatible with the decentralized nature of DeFi protocols. He raises the hypothetical scenario of a user liquidated on Aave due to network congestion, highlighting the problematic precedent it would set if the protocol were able to pursue legal action for recovery of bad debt.

夏皮罗认为，这种说法是没有根据的，并且与 DeFi 协议的去中心化性质不相容。他提出了一个假设场景，即用户因网络拥塞而在 Aave 上被清算，并强调了如果该协议能够采取法律行动追回坏账，它将开创一个有问题的先例。

As the case against Eisenberg unfolds, the crypto community awaits the legal determination of his actions and the potential implications for the industry's regulatory landscape.

随着针对艾森伯格的案件的展开，加密货币社区正在等待对其行为的法律裁决以及对行业监管环境的潜在影响。