市值: $3.3026T 0.250%
成交额(24h): $88.7887B 4.230%
  • 市值: $3.3026T 0.250%
  • 成交额(24h): $88.7887B 4.230%
  • 恐惧与贪婪指数:
  • 市值: $3.3026T 0.250%
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
热门新闻
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
bitcoin
bitcoin

$105660.503371 USD

0.08%

ethereum
ethereum

$2495.659205 USD

-0.75%

tether
tether

$1.000503 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.246230 USD

3.27%

bnb
bnb

$650.510663 USD

0.05%

solana
solana

$151.975391 USD

1.31%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999922 USD

-0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.182596 USD

-0.78%

tron
tron

$0.283540 USD

-1.07%

cardano
cardano

$0.665910 USD

0.95%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$35.388743 USD

1.47%

sui
sui

$3.218472 USD

-0.93%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.729857 USD

-0.67%

avalanche
avalanche

$20.700353 USD

1.21%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.242919 USD

0.14%

加密货币新闻

引入Solana雄心勃勃的核心升级到其共识协议的Alpenglow

2025/05/21 16:01

Solana开发人员正在计划迄今为止区块链最雄心勃勃的核心升级,该升级迄今为止,该升级替代了其当前的技术堆栈,以重新设计的共识协议为近乎建立的最终终结和响应性构建。

引入Solana雄心勃勃的核心升级到其共识协议的Alpenglow

Solana developers are planning what could be the blockchain’s most ambitious core upgrade yet — one that ditches its current technology stack and pivots to a redesigned consensus protocol built for near-instant finality and responsiveness.

Solana开发人员正在计划区块链最雄心勃勃的核心升级,这将其当前的技术堆栈和枢轴抛弃到重新设计的共识协议,该协议是为了近乎固有的最终定义和响应能力。

The new system, called Alpenglow, was unveiled on Monday by infrastructure firm Anza, a Solana Labs spinout.

新系统称为Alpenglow,周一由Solana Labs Spinout的基础设施公司Anza揭幕。

It proposes replacing Proof of History — Solana’s famously unique “pre-recorded clock” system — and Tower BFT, its existing voting mechanism for reaching consensus.

它提议替换历史证明(Solana)著名的独特“预录制时钟”系统和塔BFT,这是其现有的获得共识的投票机制。

BFT, or Byzantine Fault Tolerance, is a way for a group of network nodes to agree on a piece of information even if some were lying or broken.

BFT或拜占庭式容忍度是使一组网络节点同意一条信息的一种方式,即使有些人撒谎或破裂。

Proof of History is one of Solana’s core features, a type of cryptographic “clock” so validators don’output:t have to argue over timing when recording data to the network — a shortcut that immensely speeds the network but adds complexity.

历史证明是Solana的核心功能之一,一种加密“时钟”类型,因此验证器不要在将数据记录到网络时就时间安排争论 - 这是一种极大地加快网络但增加复杂性的快捷方式。

Why shift?

为什么要转移?

So why the proposed shift? Because both systems are relatively slow and complex under the hood. TowerBFT needs multiple rounds of voting, and Proof of History relies on a cryptographic clock that can cause coordination delays. Alpenglow simplifies this with faster, more direct communication and quicker consensus.

那么为什么拟议的转变呢?因为这两个系统在引擎盖下都相对较慢且复杂。 TowerBft需要多轮投票,历史证明依赖于可能导致协调延迟的加密时钟。 Alpenglow以更快,更直接的沟通和更快的共识来简化这一点。

In their place comes a two-part solution:

他们取而代之的是一个由两部分组成的解决方案:

1) Votor, which handles block finalization and can confirm transactions in as little as 100–150 milliseconds (based on current simulations).

1)选民,该选民可以处理封锁最终确定,并可以在100-150毫秒(基于当前的模拟)中确认交易。

2) Rotor, a data relay protocol that aims to transmit transaction data faster and more efficiently than Turbine, Solana’s current broadcast mechanism.

2)转子,一种数据继电器协议,旨在比Solana的当前广播机制更快,更有效地传输交易数据。

This isn't just a tech flex, it directly impacts developer experience, user responsiveness, and the types of apps that can run natively on Solana, including real-time finance, gaming, and social tools.

这不仅仅是技术灵活,它直接影响开发人员的体验,用户响应能力以及可以在Solana上本地运行的应用程序的类型,包括实时财务,游戏和社交工具。

These implementations could, in turn, increase on-chain activity, and by extension, SOL token demand.

这些实现可能会增加链上的活动,并扩展到Sol令牌需求。

Finality in under a second would mark a step-change for Layer 1 blockchains, most of which still operate on multi-second confirmation windows. Solana has already experimented with “optimistic confirmations” to reduce latency, but Alpenglow formalizes this into a provably fast protocol.

一秒钟以下的最终性将标志着第1层区块链的阶梯变化,其中大多数仍在多秒确认窗口上运行。 Solana已经尝试了“乐观的确认”以减少潜伏期,但Alpenglow将其正式化为一个非常快速的协议。

Finality means a transaction is fully confirmed and can’t be changed or reversed, making it a permanent part of the blockchain.

最终性意味着交易已得到充分确认,无法更改或逆转,使其成为区块链的永久部分。

Per its whitepaper, Alpenglow's Votor system could finalize blocks in a single voting round if 80% of the stake is online, or two rounds if only 60% is responsive, with both modes running concurrently to finalize on the faster path.

根据白皮书,Alpenglow的选民系统可以在单个投票回合中敲定块,如果80%的股份在线,或者只有60%的响应迅速,则两轮均可响应,两种模式都同时运行以在更快的路径上最终确定。

On the other hand, using Rotor would allow fewer “hops,” smarter relay node selection, and better bandwidth distribution to push data around the network quickly — critical for keeping block times fast without relying on a central bottleneck.

另一方面,使用转子将允许更少的“啤酒花”,更智能的继电器节点选择和更好的带宽分布来快速将数据推向网络周围的数据 - 对于不依赖中央瓶颈而不依赖中央瓶颈的块时间至关重要。

A hop is one step a piece of data takes as it moves from one computer (or node) to another across a network.

跳跃是一个数据,当它通过网络从一台计算机(或节点)移动到另一台数据时,它是一个步骤。

As of Tuesday, no launch date has been confirmed. But for Solana, this is more than just an upgrade — it’s a bet on speed as the chain’s identity. If it works, it could re-assert Solana’s position not just as the fastest L1, but as one of the only ones fast enough for real-time use cases.

截至周二,尚未确认发布日期。但是对于Solana而言,这不仅仅是升级 - 这是链条身份的速度下注。如果有效,它可能会重新确定Solana的位置,而不仅是最快的L1,而且可以作为实时用例的唯一快速的位置之一。

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2025年06月09日 发表的其他文章