爱泼斯坦文件解开了中本聪的回声和加密的秘密

新近解封的爱泼斯坦文件揭示了令人惊讶的加密货币过去，暗示了早期的比特币联系，并加深了围绕中本聪身份的神秘面纱，与加密秘密交织在一起。

The latest drop of the infamous 'Epstein Files' on January 30th has done more than just stir the pot for the usual suspects; it’s sent a ripple through the crypto world, potentially rewriting early Bitcoin history. Among the lurid details and high-profile names, whispers of Satoshi Nakamoto and encrypted secrets now echo from the past, challenging long-held assumptions about Bitcoin’s origins and its early influencers.

1 月 30 日最新发布的臭名昭著的“爱泼斯坦文件”不仅给通常的嫌疑人带来了麻烦，而且还引发了更多关注。它在加密世界中引起了轩然大波，有可能改写比特币的早期历史。在耸人听闻的细节和引人注目的名字中，中本聪的低语和加密的秘密现在回响在过去，挑战了人们长期以来对比特币起源及其早期影响者的假设。

Epstein's Unexpected Crypto Curiosity

爱泼斯坦意想不到的加密好奇心

Jeffrey Epstein, it turns out, wasn’t just a figure of infamy in high society. As early as 2011, when Bitcoin was still finding its footing, Epstein was already taking notice. His emails reveal a surprisingly prescient, albeit cynical, engagement with the nascent digital currency. He debated its fundamental nature with tech luminaries like PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, musing on whether Bitcoin was currency, property, or merely a "brilliant idea with serious flaws." He even likened its ambiguous identity to "a man disguising himself as a woman," showcasing an early grasp of the ideological debates that would define the crypto space.

事实证明，杰弗里·爱泼斯坦不仅仅是上流社会的一个臭名昭著的人物。早在 2011 年，当比特币尚未站稳脚跟时，爱泼斯坦就已经注意到了这一点。他的电子邮件揭示了他对新兴数字货币的令人惊讶的先见之明，尽管有些愤世嫉俗。他与 PayPal 联合创始人 Peter Thiel 等科技名人讨论了比特币的基本性质，思考比特币到底是货币、财产，还是仅仅是一个“有严重缺陷的绝妙想法”。他甚至将其模糊的身份比作“一个男人伪装成女人”，展示了对定义加密空间的意识形态辩论的早期把握。

His tendrils extended into the ecosystem, albeit sometimes indirectly. Documents show Epstein participated in a seed round for Blockstream, a key Bitcoin infrastructure company, through a fund. While Blockstream's CEO Adam Back has since clarified that Epstein's stake was minor and later divested, the connection itself is noteworthy. Similarly, Epstein's anonymous donations to the MIT Media Lab, totaling around $850,000, indirectly supported Bitcoin Core developers like Gavin Andresen and Wladimir van der Laan during a critical funding crunch in 2015. This support, channeled through MIT's Digital Currency Initiative, raises questions about influence, even if the fact-checks quickly debunk more sensational claims of Israeli government control or manipulation.

他的卷须延伸到生态系统中，尽管有时是间接的。文件显示，爱泼斯坦通过一支基金参与了主要比特币基础设施公司 Blockstream 的种子轮融资。尽管 Blockstream 首席执行官 Adam Back 澄清爱泼斯坦持有的股份很小，后来又被剥离，但这种联系本身就值得注意。同样，爱泼斯坦向麻省理工学院媒体实验室的匿名捐款总计约 85 万美元，在 2015 年关键的资金危机期间间接支持了加文·安德烈森 (Gavin Andresen) 和弗拉基米尔·范德兰 (Wladimir van der Laan) 等比特币核心开发人员。这种通过麻省理工学院数字货币计划提供的支持引发了人们对影响力的质疑，尽管事实核查很快揭穿了有关以色列政府控制或操纵的耸人听闻的说法。

The Satoshi Nakamoto Bombshell: A Team Effort?

中本聪的重磅炸弹：团队努力？

Perhaps the most electrifying revelation for crypto historians comes from a 2016 email. While pitching ideas for new Sharia-compliant digital currencies, Epstein casually dropped a bombshell: "I have spoken with some of the Bitcoin creators, and they are very excited." This offhand remark, likely intended to flaunt his connections, could fundamentally reshape our understanding of Bitcoin's enigmatic founder. "Some of the Bitcoin creators" implies Satoshi Nakamoto wasn't a lone genius but potentially a collaborative team. If Epstein, of all people, knew their identities, it begs the chilling question: who else knew, and why has the truth remained an encrypted secret for so long?

对于加密货币历史学家来说，最令人兴奋的启示也许来自 2016 年的一封电子邮件。在提出新的符合伊斯兰教法的数字货币的想法时，爱泼斯坦不经意间抛出了一个重磅炸弹：“我已经与一些比特币创造者交谈过，他们非常兴奋。”这句随口的话可能是为了炫耀他的关系，可能会从根本上重塑我们对比特币这位神秘创始人的理解。 “一些比特币创造者”暗示中本聪并不是一个孤独的天才，而是一个潜在的协作团队。如果爱泼斯坦在所有人中知道他们的身份，那就引出了一个令人毛骨悚然的问题：还有谁知道，为什么真相这么长时间仍然是一个加密的秘密？

The market, ever a reflection of public sentiment, reacted. Prediction markets like Polymarket saw a bump in the probability of Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin addresses becoming active, moving from 6% to 9.3% post-release, before settling around 8%. This indicates a palpable shift in collective speculation, spurred by Epstein’s boast.

作为公众情绪反映的市场也做出了反应。 Polymarket 等预测市场发现中本聪的比特币地址变得活跃的概率有所上升，从发布后的 6% 升至 9.3%，然后稳定在 8% 左右。这表明在爱泼斯坦的吹嘘刺激下，集体猜测发生了明显的转变。

Irony and Odd Encounters

讽刺和奇怪的遭遇

Adding to the peculiar narrative, Epstein’s personal take on Bitcoin was less than bullish. In a 2017 email, when Bitcoin was under $5,000, he bluntly replied "No" to an inquiry about whether it was worth buying. A stark contrast to his earlier intellectual curiosity. We also learn that Michael Saylor, the MicroStrategy CEO and today's most ardent Bitcoin maximalist, had an early brush with Epstein's orbit, attending a party hosted by Epstein's publicist in 2010. Saylor was reportedly described as "a complete freak," "utterly uncharismatic," and "like a drug-addicted zombie" by the publicist herself. It seems the universe has a strange sense of humor when connecting the dots of history.

除了这种奇特的叙述之外，爱泼斯坦个人对比特币的看法并不乐观。在 2017 年的一封电子邮件中，当比特币价格低于 5000 美元时，他对是否值得购买的询问直言不讳地回答“不”。这与他早期的求知欲形成鲜明对比。我们还了解到，MicroStrategy 首席执行官、当今最热心的比特币极端主义者 Michael Saylor 很早就接触过 Epstein 的圈子，参加了 2010 年 Epstein 公关人员举办的派对。据报道，Saylor 被公关人员形容为“一个彻头彻尾的怪胎”、“完全没有魅力”、“就像一个吸毒成瘾的僵尸”。宇宙在串联起历史的点点滴滴时，似乎有一种奇怪的幽默感。

The Unfolding Mystery of Encrypted Secrets

加密秘密的揭开之谜

The confluence of Epstein's unsavory world with the supposedly pure, decentralized origins of Bitcoin is a jarring juxtaposition. It underscores the messy reality that even systems built on radical transparency and anonymity can intersect with the darkest corners of human ambition and influence. While specific claims of deep control by Epstein or any national entity over Bitcoin's core development have been largely debunked or clarified, the mere proximity is enough to fuel a fresh wave of speculation and conspiracy theories.

爱泼斯坦的令人厌恶的世界与比特币所谓的纯粹、去中心化起源的融合是一个不和谐的并置。它强调了一个混乱的现实：即使是建立在彻底透明和匿名基础上的系统也可能与人类野心和影响力的最黑暗角落相交。尽管爱泼斯坦或任何国家实体对比特币核心开发进行深度控制的具体主张已在很大程度上被揭穿或澄清，但仅仅这种接近就足以引发新一波的猜测和阴谋论。

With roughly half of the 'Epstein Papers' still locked away, one can only wonder what other encrypted secrets—or red herrings—await discovery. The fog, it seems, may just be starting to lift, or perhaps, it's thickening with even more intriguing questions about who truly shaped the early digital frontier.

由于大约一半的“爱泼斯坦文件”仍然被锁着，人们只能想知道还有什么其他加密的秘密——或者转移注意力的东西——等待被发现。迷雾似乎刚刚开始消散，也可能随着更有趣的问题而变得越来越浓重，即谁真正塑造了早期的数字前沿。