Zora的硬幣難題：導航準則和Zachxbt的警惕之眼

Zora在Zachxbt的審查之後與粗略的硬幣和社區指南斗爭，引發了有關信任和責任感的辯論。

Yo, crypto fam! Zora, the platform backed by Coinbase, found itself in a bit of a pickle recently. After getting some heat for promoting a questionable Tyson Fury account and talk of collaborating with someone known for rug pulls, they're scrambling to clean things up. Let's dive into the drama, shall we?

喲，加密貨幣。由Coinbase支持的平台Zora最近發現自己有點泡菜。在宣傳可疑的泰森憤怒帳戶並與以地毯拉力聞名的人合作的談論之後，他們正在努力清理東西。讓我們深入研究戲劇，對吧？

Zora's New Coin Guidelines: Damage Control?

Zora的新硬幣指南：損害控制？

So, Zora's trying to do some damage control by “hiding” coins that break their community guidelines. These coins are still available for buying, selling, or transferring, but they'll come with a scam warning in your wallet. Think of it like a scarlet letter for crypto. Is it enough? Jury's still out.

因此，佐拉（Zora）試圖通過打破社區準則的“隱藏”硬幣來進行一些損害控制。這些硬幣仍然可以買賣，出售或轉讓，但它們會在您的錢包中帶有騙局警告。將其視為加密貨幣的猩紅色字母。足夠了嗎？陪審團仍在外面。

ZachXBT Sounds the Alarm: Sahil Arora Connection

zachxbt聽到警報：sahil arora連接

The real kicker? Crypto sleuth ZachXBT dropped some screenshots showing Zora and Coinbase folks allegedly planning to team up with Sahil Arora. This guy's known for celebrity-linked rug pulls – Jason Derulo, Caitlyn Jenner, Iggy Azalea, you name it. He even bragged about making $30 million last year. Not a good look, Zora.

真正的踢腳？ Crypto Sleuth Zachxbt放下了一些屏幕截圖，展示了Zora和Coinbase的人們據稱計劃與Sahil Arora合作。這個傢伙以與名人的地毯拉力聞名 - 傑森·德魯洛，凱特琳·詹納，伊吉·阿扎利亞，你說的。去年，他甚至吹牛賺了3000萬美元。看不錯，佐拉。

Coinbase's Jesse Pollak even suggested Arora ditch the “bad guy positioning” and said he was excited about Arora's “positive impact.” Seriously? ZachXBT hilariously pointed out the absurdity by replacing Arora's name with Kim Jong Un and the Lazarus Group. Ouch.

Coinbase的傑西·波拉克（Jesse Pollak）甚至建議阿羅拉（Arora）拋棄“壞人定位”，並說他對阿羅拉（Arora）的“積極影響”感到興奮。嚴重地？ Zachxbt搞笑地指出了荒謬的，用Kim Jong Un和Lazarus Group取代Arora的名字。哎喲。

The Tyson Fury Fiasco: A Trust Trap

泰森憤怒慘敗：信託陷阱

Remember that “verified” Tyson Fury account that popped up on Zora, complete with a token? It vanished within hours, along with users' money (sort of). Turns out, it was a classic trust trap. Someone created a fake account, linked it to a verified Twitter profile, and boom – users rushed in. Once the hype died down, the account disappeared, and the token vanished from Zora's frontend. Sneaky, right?

還記得在Zora上彈出的“經過驗證的” Tyson Fury帳戶，並帶有令牌嗎？它在幾個小時內消失了，以及用戶的錢（有點）。事實證明，這是一個經典的信任陷阱。有人創建了一個假帳戶，將其鏈接到經過驗證的Twitter個人資料，然後Boom - 用戶湧入。一旦炒作消失了，該帳戶就消失了，而代幣則從Zora的前端消失了。偷偷摸摸，對吧？

Base in a Bind: The Social Engineering Rug

基礎結合：社會工程地毯

The drama didn't stop at Zora. It spilled over to Base, where Jesse Pollak found himself in a lose-lose situation. Block Sahil, and you look like you're censoring permissionless access. Allow it, and you're backing a bad actor. That's social engineering at its finest – set up a situation where every choice looks bad. Trust is the real issue here. Verified social accounts boost credibility, but when those accounts can be linked and unlinked at will, scammers can exploit the system.

戲劇並沒有停在佐拉。它濺到了基地，傑西·普爾拉克（Jesse Pollak）在那兒發現自己處於失敗的境地。阻止Sahil，您看起來好像正在審查無許可訪問。允許它，您正在支持一個壞演員。這是最好的社會工程學 - 建立了每個選擇看起來不好的情況。信任是這裡的真正問題。經過驗證的社會帳戶提高了信譽，但是當這些帳戶可以隨意鏈接和鏈接時，騙子可以利用該系統。

ZachXBT vs. Kaito: The Yap Farmer Debate

Zachxbt vs. Kaito：YAP農民辯論

ZachXBT also went after Kaito, accusing a partnered project of inflating user metrics. He warned crypto firms not to attract Yap farmers, because they can destroy a new project’s reputation. He argued that Yap spammers ruin projects by calling them “scams” when airdrops are worthless, and said firms shouldn't get involved with the platform.

Zachxbt也追隨Kaito，指責一個合作的項目誇大用戶指標。他警告加密公司不要吸引農民，因為他們可以摧毀一個新項目的聲譽。他辯稱，YAP垃圾郵件發送者毀了項目時，當氣盤毫無價值時稱它們為“騙局”，並說公司不應該參與該平台。

My Take: Zora's at a Crossroads

我的看法：佐拉在十字路口

Zora's got some serious decisions to make. On one hand, they want to be the go-to platform for creator onboarding. On the other hand, they need to protect users from scams and rug pulls. It's a tough balancing act. Stronger verification, on-chain transparency, and clear communication are key. Otherwise, these memory-hole rugs will keep happening. Zora can't allow itself to become the poster child for celebrity-endorsed crypto scams. And it certainly needs to be more circumspect about who it partners with. Coinbase and Jesse Pollak have reputations to protect too.

Zora做出了一些嚴肅的決定。一方面，他們希望成為創建者入職的首選平台。另一方面，他們需要保護用戶免受騙局和地毯的拉力。這是一個艱難的平衡行為。更強的驗證，鏈透明性和清晰的交流是關鍵。否則，這些記憶地毯將不斷發生。 Zora不能讓自己成為名人認可的加密騙局的海報孩子。當然，它需要更謹慎地與誰合作。 Coinbase和Jesse Pollak也有聲譽以保護。

So, what's the takeaway? The world of crypto is wild, and trust is a precious commodity. Always do your research, and don't let hype override your common sense. And hey, maybe avoid those celebrity-backed coins for now, unless you're into that sort of thing. Stay safe out there, crypto cowboys and cowgirls!

那麼，收穫是什麼？加密世界是狂野的，信任是一種寶貴的商品。始終進行研究，不要讓炒作超越您的常識。嘿，也許現在可以避免那些由名人支持的硬幣，除非您喜歡這種事情。在那裡保持安全，加密牛仔和女牛仔！