特朗普，加密和《硬幣法》：最新戲劇的紐約分鐘

導航特朗普，加密貨幣和《硬幣法》的交匯處。該博客文章介紹了關鍵發展，潛在影響以及對數字資產的未來意味著什麼。

Alright, folks, let's break down this whole Trump, crypto, and COIN Act situation. It's a whirlwind of politics, digital dough, and enough drama to make your head spin. Basically, the COIN Act aims to keep presidents and their families out of the crypto game, especially when it looks like they're cashing in on their positions. Is it fair? Is it necessary? Let's dive in.

好吧，伙計們，讓我們分解整個特朗普，加密和硬幣行為的情況。這是政治，數字麵團和足夠戲劇性的旋風，可以使您的頭旋轉。基本上，《硬幣法》旨在使總統及其家人遠離加密遊戲，尤其是當他們似乎正在兌現自己的位置時。公平嗎？有必要嗎？讓我們潛水。

The COIN Act: What's the Deal?

硬幣法：這是什麼交易？

So, Senator Adam Schiff and the Democratic crew are back at it with the Curbing Officials’ Income and Non-disclosure (COIN) Act. The main target? Allegedly, it's stopping “Trump’s corruption” related to crypto. Schiff's not holding back, claiming Trump's making bank—over a billion dollars, allegedly—off crypto schemes at the expense of regular folks.

因此，參議員亞當·希夫（Adam Schiff）和民主黨船員伴隨著遏制官員的收入和不公開（硬幣）法案重返局。主要目標？據稱，它停止了與加密貨幣有關的“特朗普的腐敗”。席夫（Schiff）並沒有阻止，據稱特朗普（Trump）賺了十億美元的銀行，以犧牲普通人為代價的加密貨幣計劃。

The COIN Act is designed to block the President, VP, and their families from launching or endorsing crypto. There's even a cooling-off period: six months before taking office and two years after leaving. During this time, they're supposed to stay away from crypto activities altogether. Schiff says this will address the concerns around Trump’s crypto dealings.

《硬幣法》旨在阻止總統，副總裁及其家人推出或認可加密。甚至還有一個冷卻期：上任前六個月和離開後兩年。在此期間，他們應該完全遠離加密活動。希夫說，這將解決有關特朗普的加密交易的擔憂。

Trump's Crypto Empire: A Quick Rundown

特朗普的加密帝國：迅速失敗

Love him or hate him, Trump and his family have dipped their toes—or maybe plunged headfirst—into the crypto world. From memecoins to stablecoins, they've got a hand in several digital currencies, many managed by World Liberty Financial (WLFI). WLFI is also behind the USD1 stablecoin, which is growing fast.

愛他或恨他，特朗普和他的家人傾斜了他們的腳趾，或者可能首先跌落到了加密世界。從成員到穩定幣，他們已經掌握了幾種數字貨幣，許多貨幣由世界自由金融（WLFI）管理。 WLFI也是USD1 Stablecoin的落後，該Stablecoin正在快速增長。

But it hasn't all been smooth sailing. Trump's crypto ventures have faced scandals and accusations of conflicts of interest. Whether it's the Official Trump memecoin or the USD1 stablecoin, critics argue that he's blurring the lines between public office and personal profit.

但這並非全部航行。特朗普的加密貨幣企業面臨著醜聞和指控利益衝突。無論是官方的特朗普紀念物還是USD1 Stablecoin，批評者都認為他模糊了公職和個人利潤之間的界限。

Executive Orders and Crypto-Friendly Moves

執行命令和加密友好的舉動

Here's where things get interesting. While some politicians are trying to rein in Trump's crypto activities, there's also talk of an executive order that could limit banks from “debunking” certain sectors, including crypto. According to the WSJ, the Trump administration might be exploring ways to force banks to provide services to crypto companies.

這是事情變得有趣的地方。儘管一些政客試圖遏制特朗普的加密活動，但也有一個談論行政命令，該行政命令可能會限制銀行“揭穿”某些部門（包括加密貨幣）。根據WSJ的說法，特朗普政府可能正在探索迫使銀行為加密公司提供服務的方法。

And it's not just talk. The Federal Reserve has eliminated “reputational risk” as a factor in bank examinations. This means banks won't be penalized for servicing crypto firms. Even Jerome Powell, the Fed Chair, has said banks can offer services to crypto companies, provided they follow the rules.

這不僅僅是說話。美聯儲將“聲譽風險”作為銀行考試的一個因素。這意味著銀行不會因為加密公司提供服務而受到懲罰。即使是美聯儲主席杰羅姆·鮑威爾（Jerome Powell）也表示，如果遵守規則，銀行可以為加密貨幣公司提供服務。

My Two Satoshis

我的兩個satoshis

Look, this whole situation is a mixed bag. On one hand, you've got concerns about potential conflicts of interest and politicians profiting from crypto schemes. On the other hand, there's a push to make the U.S. more crypto-friendly and ensure that digital asset companies have access to banking services.

看，整個情況是一個混合的袋子。一方面，您對潛在的利益衝突和從加密計劃中獲利的政客感到擔憂。另一方面，正在推動使美國更加友好的加密貨幣，並確保數字資產公司可以使用銀行服務。

It seems that Schiff is not going to serve as a hurdle for crypto innovation in the U.S., while he is still concerned about eye-popping Trump’s conflict of interest. It’s too early to judge if the proposal will see success. Previously, Republicans showed no interest in limiting Trump’s involvement in the crypto business, so the COIN Act may be rejected just like the amendments to the GENIUS Act that were denied before. However, time will show if this defining bill will become the rule.

似乎Schiff並不是在美國加密創新的障礙，而他仍然擔心特朗普的利益衝突。現在判斷該提案是否會取得成功還為時過早。此前，共和黨人對限制特朗普參與加密業務的興趣沒有興趣，因此《硬幣法》可能會像以前被拒絕的《天才法》的修正案一樣被拒絕。但是，時間將表明該定義法案是否將成為規則。

The Bottom Line

底線

Whether you're a crypto enthusiast or just a casual observer, the intersection of Trump, crypto, and the COIN Act is something to watch. Will the COIN Act put a damper on Trump's crypto empire? Will the executive order open the floodgates for crypto banking? Only time will tell.

無論您是加密愛好者還是隨便的觀察者，特朗普，加密貨幣和硬幣行為的交集都是值得關注的。 《硬幣法》是否會給特朗普的加密帝國帶來阻尼器嗎？行政命令會為加密銀行打開閘門嗎？只有時間會證明。

One thing's for sure: this is a wild ride, and we're just getting started. So buckle up, grab your popcorn, and stay tuned. Because in the world of crypto and politics, there's never a dull moment.

可以肯定的是：這是一個瘋狂的旅程，我們才剛剛開始。因此，搭扣，抓住爆米花，繼續關注。因為在加密和政治世界中，從來沒有一個沉悶的時刻。