![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
蒂克托克(Tiktok)在行政命令延誤中否認特朗普令牌賄賂指控。擔心特朗普的加密聯繫和道德。共插的漏洞揭示了外包的黑暗面。
Hold onto your hats, folks! The intersection of TikTok, Trump tokens, and alleged bribes is proving to be one of the most bizarre stories in crypto. Let's dive in!
抓住你的帽子,伙計們!蒂克托克(Tiktok),特朗普(Trump)代幣和所謂的賄賂的交叉路口被證明是加密貨幣中最奇怪的故事之一。讓我們潛入!
TikTok Says "No Deal" to Trump Token Bribe
蒂克托克(Tiktok)對特朗普的賄賂說“無交易”
TikTok is firing back at claims that it purchased $300 million worth of TRUMP memecoins to sway former President Donald Trump. In a fiery statement on X, the company called the accusation "false and irresponsible," aimed at misrepresenting their actions. This came after US Congressman Brad Sherman suggested ByteDance (TikTok's parent company) bought a hefty sum of TRUMP tokens, essentially bribing Trump since he created the token at no cost.
蒂克托克(Tiktok)聲稱它購買了價值3億美元的特朗普紀念物來搖擺前總統唐納德·特朗普(Donald Trump)。在X上的火熱聲明中,該公司稱該指控為“虛假和不負責任”,目的是虛假陳述其行為。這是在美國國會議員布拉德·謝爾曼(Brad Sherman)建議的拜登斯(Tiktok的母公司)購買了一筆巨額的特朗普代幣,這基本上是在特朗普(Trump)免費創建令牌,這是在美國國會議員布拉德·謝爾曼(Brad Sherman)提出的。
TikTok isn't having it, labeling Sherman's interpretation of a recent letter as misleading. They're stressing that no such transaction occurred and that the allegations are baseless. This spat comes as Trump issued another executive order, giving TikTok 90 more days to finalize its US operations sale or face a nationwide ban. Critics argue Trump lacked the legal grounds for this extension.
蒂克托克(Tiktok)沒有這樣做,將謝爾曼(Sherman)對最近一封信的解釋標記為誤導。他們強調沒有發生這種交易,並且指控毫無根據。當特朗普發布了另一項行政命令時,這種吐口水是在泰克托克(Tiktok)發出的90天,以最終確定其美國運營銷售或面臨全國范圍的禁令。批評者認為,特朗普缺乏這一擴展的法律理由。
Trump's Crypto Ties: Ethics Alarm Bells Ringing?
特朗普的加密聯繫:道德警報鈴響嗎?
The TRUMP memecoin itself is under scrutiny, thanks to its promotion by the Trump family. Critics are waving red flags about potential conflicts of interest. A president linked to digital assets could face some serious questions about ethics, transparency, and foreign influence.
由於特朗普家族的晉升,特朗普的成人本身受到了審查。批評家揮舞著關於潛在利益衝突的危險信號。與數字資產聯繫在一起的總統可能會面臨一些有關道德,透明度和外國影響力的嚴重問題。
Lawmakers and watchdogs are worried about the misuse of political office for personal gain, especially with tokens that have no clear use or value. And let's not forget, the TRUMP memecoin is trading way below its all-time high, facing constant sell pressure. Ouch!
立法者和監管機構擔心濫用政治辦公室以謀取個人利益,尤其是對於沒有明確使用或價值的代幣。而且不要忘記,特朗普的紀念物的交易方式低於其歷史最高水平,面臨著持續的賣出壓力。哎喲!
Coinbase's Call Center Catastrophe: A Bribe Gone Wrong
Coinbase的呼叫中心災難:賄賂錯誤
In a shocking twist, over 69,000 Coinbase users had their personal data compromised. The culprit? Good old-fashioned bribery. A customer support team in Indore, India, was at the center of the breach. Teen hackers reportedly bribed call center workers to access internal systems, impersonated Coinbase employees, and tricked users into handing over their wallets. Ouch again!
令人震驚的是,超過69,000個Coinbase用戶的個人數據損害了。罪魁禍首?好老式的賄賂。印度印度印第安納州的客戶支持團隊處於漏洞的中心。據報導,青少年黑客賄賂了呼叫中心的工人訪問內部系統,模仿了Coinbase員工,並欺騙用戶移交錢包。再次哎呀!
The call center was run by TaskUs, a Texas-based outsourcing company. It seems saving money on overseas support came with some serious security gaps. TaskUs has since admitted that employees illegally accessed client data. Low wages (between $500 and $700 a month) made bribery tempting. Once the hackers had internal records, they could easily trick customers.
呼叫中心由總部位於德克薩斯州的外包公司Taskus經營。似乎有一些嚴重的安全差距,似乎在海外支持上節省了錢。此後,任務已承認員工非法訪問了客戶數據。低工資(每月500美元至700美元之間)使賄賂誘人。一旦黑客擁有內部記錄,他們就可以輕鬆欺騙客戶。
The Fallout and What It Means
輻射及其含義
Coinbase is offering a $20 million bounty for info on the attackers. A class-action lawsuit has been filed against TaskUs for negligence. This incident is a cautionary tale for companies offshoring customer support. Are user data really protected when agents are underpaid and easily targeted?
Coinbase提供了2000萬美元的賞金,以獲取有關攻擊者的信息。針對任務的過失已提起集體訴訟。該事件是公司離岸客戶支持的一個警示性故事。當代理被低估且易於針對性時,用戶數據是否真的受到保護?
This isn't the first time Indian call centers have been used to target global users, but the scale of this breach is a turning point. No amount of encryption can protect a system from insiders being bought off. This highlights a big challenge for the crypto world.
這不是印度呼叫中心第一次被用來針對全球用戶,但這種違規的規模是轉折點。沒有任何加密可以保護系統免受被購買的內部人員的影響。這重點介紹了加密貨幣世界的巨大挑戰。
My Take
我的看法
While the TikTok and Trump token saga feels like a political circus, the Coinbase breach is a stark reminder of the real-world risks in crypto. We need better security measures, especially when outsourcing critical functions. The incident underscores how vulnerabilities in human systems can undermine even the most sophisticated technological defenses.
雖然Tiktok和Trump token Saga感覺就像是一個政治馬戲團,但Coinbase的違規行為明顯地提醒了Crypto中現實世界中的風險。我們需要更好的安全措施,尤其是在外包關鍵功能時。該事件強調了人類系統中的脆弱性如何破壞甚至最複雜的技術防禦能力。
The combination of political theater and genuine security lapses illustrates the complex and often unpredictable nature of the crypto landscape. As crypto continues to integrate into mainstream finance, these incidents serve as a reminder of the need for robust ethical guidelines and regulatory oversight.
政治劇院和真正的安全失誤的結合說明了加密景觀的複雜且通常是不可預測的本質。隨著加密貨幣繼續融入主流金融,這些事件提醒人們需要強大的道德準則和監管監督。
So, what's next? Will TikTok find a buyer? Will the TRUMP memecoin make a comeback? And will Coinbase beef up its security? Only time will tell. But one thing's for sure: the world of crypto is never dull!
那麼,下一步是什麼? Tiktok會找到買家嗎?特朗普成人會捲土重來嗎? Coinbase會增強其安全性嗎?只有時間會證明。但是可以肯定的是:加密世界永遠不會沉悶!
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- Bonk,以太坊和AI實用程序:一個新時代?
- 2025-06-21 12:25:12
- 探索Bonk的動量,以太坊的韌性以及Crypto中AI實用程序的興起($ UNSD)的交匯點。
-
- 比特幣價格預測:BTC會反彈還是分解?
- 2025-06-21 12:25:12
- 分析最新的比特幣價格動作,潛在的彈跳場景以及影響BTC下一步行動的關鍵因素。
-
- Bonk價格預測:模因硬幣會反彈嗎?
- 2025-06-21 12:30:12
- Bonk表現出更新的力量跡象,但是足夠了嗎?探索最新的價格預測,市值分析和有希望的替代方案。
-
- 比特幣的$ 100K- $ 110K範圍:短興趣加熱!
- 2025-06-21 12:45:12
- 比特幣陷入了$ 10萬美元的範圍,短職位上升。大舉釀造嗎?讓我們深入研究最新數據,分析師採用。
-
-
- 模因硬幣,加密和爆炸:2025年的Poppin'是什麼?
- 2025-06-21 13:05:11
- 模因硬幣在2025年仍在浪潮!我們正在深入了解模因硬幣躁狂症,探索頂級競爭者以及使他們打勾的原因。
-
-
-