市值: $3.3681T 1.190%
體積(24小時): $82.0486B 24.680%
  • 市值: $3.3681T 1.190%
  • 體積(24小時): $82.0486B 24.680%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $3.3681T 1.190%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$109408.092997 USD

1.15%

ethereum
ethereum

$2576.759001 USD

2.43%

tether
tether

$1.000278 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.276102 USD

2.70%

bnb
bnb

$662.328194 USD

1.09%

solana
solana

$152.320048 USD

3.54%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$1.000060 USD

0.00%

tron
tron

$0.288181 USD

1.62%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.173414 USD

5.90%

cardano
cardano

$0.590629 USD

3.17%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$39.996344 USD

1.59%

sui
sui

$2.935392 USD

1.32%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$499.091118 USD

2.48%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.620152 USD

3.25%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.048157 USD

0.09%

加密貨幣新聞文章

可持續投資者,物質性和ESG因素:導航新景觀

2025/07/03 02:00

探索可持續投資者如何專注於重要性和ESG因素,以驅動回報並瀏覽不斷發展的投資格局。

可持續投資者,物質性和ESG因素:導航新景觀

Sustainable Investors, Materiality, and ESG Factors: Navigating the New Landscape

可持續投資者,物質性和ESG因素:導航新景觀

Sustainable investing is evolving. After facing criticism and political headwinds, investors are now coalescing around materiality – the financial relevance of ESG factors – to drive better returns and navigate the complex landscape.

可持續投資正在發展。在面臨批評和政治逆風之後,投資者現在圍繞著物質性(ESG因素的財務意義)結合起來,以提高回報並瀏覽複雜的景觀。

Defining Materiality in Sustainable Investing

定義可持續投資的重要性

Materiality isn't a one-size-fits-all concept. It has various definitions:

物質性不是一個千篇一律的概念。它有各種定義:

  • Legal and Financial: Information a reasonable investor would consider important.
  • ESG-Related: Factors impacting a company's operations and financial growth.
  • Dual Materiality: Risks and opportunities for the company, and the company’s impact on the world.
  • Principles-Driven: Factors important to specific individuals or groups (e.g., faith-based investors).

Materiality Across Asset Classes

跨資產類別的重要性

The application of materiality varies depending on the asset class. For real estate, it might involve assessing physical risks like wildfires. For publicly traded companies, it could mean comparing how companies manage similar risks within their supply chains. The goal is always improved returns.

物質的應用取決於資產類別。對於房地產,它可能涉及評估諸如野火之類的身體風險。對於公開交易的公司,這可能意味著比較如何在其供應鏈中管理類似風險的方式。目標始終是改善回報。

Competitive Advantage and ESG Risks

競爭優勢和ESG風險

Companies are increasingly aware of ESG risks and their impact on competitiveness. China's dominance in renewable energy gives them a competitive edge. Companies failing to adapt to the energy transition face growing financial risks. Investors are increasingly focusing on companies with intellectual property, ideas, and patents, and enjoying high profits.

公司越來越了解ESG風險及其對競爭力的影響。中國在可再生能源方面的主導地位使他們具有競爭優勢。公司未能適應能源過渡的公司面臨著日益增長的財務風險。投資者越來越關注擁有知識產權,想法和專利的公司,並享受高利潤。

Ensuring Materiality in ESG Investments

確保ESG投資的重要性

Investors must ensure ESG factors are material to the specific company. What's material for a consumer retail company like Target might differ significantly from an industrial machinery company like Deere. DEI is more material to consumer retail.

投資者必須確保ESG因素對特定公司的重要性。像Target這樣的消費零售公司的材料可能與像Deere這樣的工業機械公司有很大差異。 DEI對消費者零售是更多的材料。

Future Material Risk Factors

未來的物質風險因素

Long-term risks, such as climate change, are crucial. Even without immediate financial repercussions, environmental damage can increase reputational, legislative, and operational costs over time. As more ESG data becomes available, materiality becomes clearer.

長期風險(例如氣候變化)至關重要。即使沒有立即財務影響,環境損失也會隨著時間的推移增加聲譽,立法和運營成本。隨著更多的ESG數據可用,物質性變得更加清晰。

The Role of Engagement

參與的作用

Many companies are hesitant to publicize their ESG efforts due to the current political climate. Engagement helps investors understand what companies are doing behind the scenes and ensures they address material risks and opportunities.

由於當前的政治氣氛,許多公司不願宣傳其ESG努力。參與幫助投資者了解公司在幕後所做的事情,並確保他們解決物質風險和機遇。

The Future of Sustainable Investing

可持續投資的未來

The emphasis on materiality could revitalize sustainable investing by focusing on returns. The current pushback against ESG may be a market correction, but the underlying relevance remains. Focusing on financial relevance is never a bad idea, right?

對重要性的重視可以通過專注於回報來振興可持續投資。當前對ESG的反擊可能是市場的更正,但基本相關性仍然存在。專注於財務相關性從來都不是一個壞主意,對嗎?

So, while the debate around sustainable investing might continue, one thing's for sure: focusing on what truly matters – both financially and ethically – is a strategy that’s here to stay. Now, go forth and invest wisely, my friends!

因此,儘管圍繞可持續投資的辯論可能會繼續,但可以肯定的是:關注真正重要的事情(無論是在財務上還是在道德上)是一項策略。現在,我的朋友們明智地投資!

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年07月07日 其他文章發表於