Solana 基金會解決 Meme 幣爭議：言論自由與內容過濾

The Solana Foundation and the Meme Coin Controversy: A Balancing Act Between Content Filtering and Free Speech

Solana 基金會與 Meme 幣爭議：內容過濾與言論自由之間的平衡之舉

The proliferation of meme coins featuring racist themes has ignited a fervent debate within the cryptocurrency community, prompting a discussion on the boundaries of content filtering and the role of blockchain networks in the regulation of free speech. At the BUIDL Asia event in Seoul, the Solana Foundation's strategy head, Austin Federa, underscored the paramount importance of maintaining a permissionless core network, akin to the unrestricted nature of the internet. He opined that it is the prerogative of wallet developers to determine content filtering measures, similar to how internet service providers (ISPs) are not held responsible for blocking offensive material.

以種族主義為主題的迷因幣的激增引發了加密貨幣社群內的激烈爭論，引發了關於內容過濾的邊界以及區塊鏈網路在言論自由監管中的作用的討論。在首爾舉行的 BUIDL 亞洲活動上，Solana 基金會的策略負責人 Austin Federa 強調了維護無需許可的核心網絡的至關重要性，類似於互聯網的不受限制的性質。他認為，確定內容過濾措施是錢包開發商的特權，類似於網路服務供應商（ISP）不負責阻止攻擊性材料。

In contrast, Marc Zeller of the Aave Chan Initiative highlighted the varying cultural attitudes towards offensive content and emphasized that European Union laws mandate content filtering, as exemplified by France's legal obligation to block Holocaust denial content. However, Zeller acknowledged that the blockchain ethos typically prioritizes free speech and censorship resistance over content elimination.

相較之下，Aave Chan Initiative 的 Marc Zeller 強調了對攻擊性內容的不同文化態度，並強調歐盟法律強制要求內容過濾，法國有法律義務阻止否認大屠殺的內容就是例證。然而，澤勒承認，區塊鏈精神通常優先考慮言論自由和審查制度抵制，而不是內容消除。

The discussion also delved into the legal responsibilities of validators and nodes, with Federa citing the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions on Ethereum Tornado Cash transactions as a case in point where some community members felt compelled to censor transactions. This has sparked extensive debate within the Ethereum community regarding the ethical and legal implications of such actions.

討論還深入探討了驗證者和節點的法律責任，Federa 引用了外國資產控制辦公室 (OFAC) 對以太坊龍捲風現金交易的製裁作為一些社區成員感到有必要審查交易的例子。這在以太坊社群內引發了關於此類行為的道德和法律影響的廣泛辯論。

Despite the controversy surrounding racist meme coins, Federa maintained that their impact on the broader crypto market is relatively insignificant, likening them to small hate groups seeking attention. He emphasized that users have the option to reveal offensive content if they so desire, but the core network must remain permissionless.

儘管圍繞種族主義模因硬幣存在爭議，但 Federa 堅持認為，它們對更廣泛的加密貨幣市場的影響相對較小，將它們比作尋求關注的小型仇恨團體。他強調，如果使用者願意，可以選擇透露攻擊性內容，但核心網路必須保持未經許可的狀態。

"Choice means the right for a wallet developer to institute a block list," Federa stated. "Almost every wallet in every ecosystem filters out spam NFTs and spam tokens. Users always have the ability to reveal something if they want to, but the core network needs to remain permissionless. No one expects Verizon to have a legal obligation to prevent a phishing email from landing in your inbox or to prevent you from accessing something that is potentially racist material."

Federa 表示：“選擇意味著錢包開發商有權制定黑名單。” 「幾乎每個生態系統中的每個錢包都會過濾掉垃圾郵件NFT 和垃圾郵件代幣。如果用戶願意，他們總是有能力透露一些信息，但核心網絡需要保持未經許可的狀態。沒有人認為Verizon 有法律義務來防止網路釣魚電子郵件進入您的收件匣或阻止您存取可能存在種族主義內容的內容。”

In a contrasting development, meme coins, particularly those based on Solana, have experienced a surge in value. Dogwifhat (WIF) has emerged as the third-largest meme token by market capitalization, benefiting from the broader crypto market's relative stagnation. The growth in the meme coin category has outpaced that of other niches, driven by speculative bets on DOGE-tracked futures and rumors of DOGE's potential integration into an upcoming payment service.

與此形成鮮明對比的是，迷因幣，尤其是基於 Solana 的迷因幣，經歷了價值飆升。受益於更廣泛的加密市場的相對停滯，Dogwifhat（WIF）已成為按市值計算的第三大模因代幣。在 DOGE 追蹤期貨的投機性押注以及 DOGE 可能整合到即將推出的支付服務的傳言的推動下，模因幣類別的增長速度超過了其他利基市場。

The Solana Foundation's stance on meme coins and content censorship reflects the fundamental tension between the principles of free speech and the obligation to prevent the dissemination of harmful or offensive material. As the cryptocurrency ecosystem continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how these competing imperatives will be reconciled.

Solana 基金會對迷因幣和內容審查制度的立場反映了言論自由原則與防止有害或冒犯性材料傳播的義務之間的根本緊張關係。隨著加密貨幣生態系統的不斷發展，如何協調這些相互競爭的要求還有待觀察。