![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
The Solana Foundation has disclosed and patched a zero-day vulnerability that could have allowed attackers to mint confidential tokens and withdraw them from unsuspecting users’ accounts.
The flaw, which was silently resolved before any known exploit occurred, has swiftly sparked heated debates around Solana’s network decentralization as several key contributors, including Anza, Firedancer, Jito, Asymmetric Research, Neodyme, and OtterSec, came together to coordinate the patching process.
According to a May 3 post-mortem from the Solana Foundation, the vulnerability was first identified on April 16 and affected Solana’s privacy-focused "Token-22 confidential tokens." These tokens rely on zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to ensure the privacy of transfers, a feature designed to enable advanced and confidential token functionalities within the Solana ecosystem.
On April 16, 2025, the Solana Foundation discovered a zero-day vulnerability in the Token-2022 standard's confidential transfers feature, which could have allowed attackers to forge zero-knowledge proofs to mint unlimited tokens or steal user assets. The Foundation privately…
The security gap originated in the Token-2022 and ZK ElGamal Proof programs, where a cryptographic flaw in the Fiat-Shamir Transformation process had implications for forging proofs. It occurred because certain algebraic components were not properly hashed, undermining the integrity of the proof verification mechanism.
In essence, the flaw might have enabled malicious actors to simulate valid balances and mint confidential tokens—an alarming loophole that, had it been exploited, could have seen batches of tokens spawn out of thin air.
Despite the critical nature of the vulnerability, no funds were lost, and a supermajority of validators had already adopted the patched version within two days.
Solana Patch Sparks Centralization Fears
The rapid behind-the-scenes patching process has nevertheless raised eyebrows among decentralization purists.
A contributor from Curve Finance sparked the discussion by inquiring about the Foundation's ability to swiftly contact validators and whether this level of influence undermines SOL's claims of being a decentralized network.
The concern: such close coordination could facilitate censorship or even orchestrated rollbacks, hallmarks of centralized control.
This seems like a massive vulnerability to have been discovered so quickly. Is there a reason why the snapshot on April 15th was used instead of the genesis snapshot? Wouldn't that have huge implications for liquidity on the chain?
Solana Labs CEO Anatoly Yakovenko responded by highlighting that Ethereum validators, many operated by large staking providers like Lido, Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken, could coordinate similarly in a severe emergency.
"If geth needs to push a patch, I’ll be happy to coordinate for them. We can ping them on the relevant Discord channels or email,” Yakovenko stated.
But not everyone agrees with the comparison.
Solana One Client Risk Exposed
A member of the Ethereum community, Ryan Berckmans, countered that Ethereum's client diversity serves as a safeguard against the kind of single-point-of-failure risks posed by SOL. He noted that Geth, Ethereum's dominant client, holds no more than 41% market share, while SOL currently operates with just one production-ready client, Agave.
"This means that a zero-day bug in the single Solana client is de facto a protocol bug. Change the single client program, change the protocol itself. This is a huge difference," Berckmans argued.
Solana's roadmap offers a partial answer. The highly anticipated Firedancer client, developed in collaboration with Jump Crypto and expected to launch in the coming months, promises enhanced performance and redundancy.
Still, as Berckmans pointed out, true decentralization at the client level may require at least three independent clients, a goal that Solana has yet to achieve.
While the vulnerability was patched swiftly before any real damage occurred, the incident highlights a growing tension in the blockchain world: the trade-off between security responsiveness and decentralization.
Solana's ability to act quickly in the face of a zero-day flaw is commendable, but it has also spotlighted its centralized levers of control.
As Solana continues to evolve with Firedancer on the horizon and more zero-knowledge capabilities in development, the community will be watching closely to see whether the network can strike a sustainable balance between performance, privacy, and decentralization.
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
-
-
- Algorand(Algo)等待上漲$ 0.209的確認
- 2025-06-14 00:15:12
- 在持續下降壓力後,資產似乎正在穩定。早期的跡象表明,情緒可能會從看跌轉變為更中性或略微看漲的語氣。
-
- SEC椅子的後背defi和自我客戶 - 承諾對加密和比特幣的更明確規則
- 2025-06-14 00:15:12
- 在與SEC先前的立場的重大轉變中,新任主席Paul S. Atkins表示對分散財務,加密創新和
-
- 肯尼亞的比特幣[BTC]也飆升,即使在非正式定居點
- 2025-06-14 00:10:12
- 這總結了BTC和Crypto的金融包容性用例,尤其是在銀行訪問較低的地區。
-
- 超流動性(炒作)代幣價格預測:它會達到100美元嗎?
- 2025-06-14 00:10:12
- 超級流動性的本地令牌炒作已經席捲了排名,成為市值的前11個加密貨幣之一
-
-
-
- 2025年6月的7個最佳模因硬幣預售(不要錯過這些指數的收益)
- 2025-06-14 00:01:08
- Meme硬幣再次引起人們的關注,為大量收益帶來了潛力,並為加密貨幣景觀帶來了很多樂趣。