Ripple 技術長 David Schwartz 質疑比特幣的身份和治理範式

Ripple 技術長 David Schwartz 挑戰了傳統觀念，即比特幣的名稱和所有權屬於擁有多數算力的一方。他認為，理性使用者優先考慮網路的性質和價值而不是其名稱，而哈希算力控制的概念引入了可能與他們的期望或需求不符的治理模型。施瓦茨的批評引發了關於加密貨幣治理以及礦工和用戶之間權力平衡的更廣泛討論，凸顯了去中心化數位貨幣管理的複雜性和不斷演變。

David Schwartz, Ripple's Chief Technology Officer, Challenges Bitcoin's Naming and Governance Paradigms

Ripple 技術長 David Schwartz 挑戰比特幣的命名與治理範式

San Francisco, California - April 22, 2024 - Ripple's David Schwartz has ignited a fervent debate within the cryptocurrency community by questioning the long-held belief that the name and identity of Bitcoin solely reside with the network's dominant hash power holders. In a series of incisive tweets and social media posts, Schwartz argues that this simplistic notion overlooks the complexities inherent in the governance of decentralized digital currencies like Bitcoin.

加州舊金山- 2024 年4 月22 日- Ripple 的David Schwartz 對長期以來認為比特幣的名稱和身份僅屬於網絡主要算力持有者的觀點提出了質疑，從而在加密貨幣社區內引發了一場激烈的辯論。在一系列尖銳的推文和社群媒體貼文中，施瓦茨認為這種簡化的概念忽略了比特幣等去中心化數位貨幣治理固有的複雜性。

Hash Power vs. Network Identity

算力與網路身份

Schwartz's critique stems from the premise that the legitimacy of a cryptocurrency's name and governing authority should not be determined solely by the whims of those wielding the majority of hash power. He emphasizes that rational users prioritize the intrinsic qualities of a network over arbitrary nomenclature.

施瓦茨的批評源於這樣一個前提：加密貨幣名稱和管理機構的合法性不應僅由掌握大多數算力的人的一時興起來決定。他強調，理性使用者優先考慮網路的內在品質，而不是任意命名。

"Do you think a rational user says 'I want whatever is called bitcoin, whether it's good or bad, honest or corrupt?'" Schwartz tweeted. "The former is how you tell what is 'bitcoin'. The latter is how you get what you actually want."

「你認為理性的用戶會說『我想要任何所謂的比特幣，無論它是好還是壞、誠實還是腐敗？』」施瓦茨在推特上寫道。 “前者是你如何分辨什麼是‘比特幣’。後者是你如何獲得你真正想要的東西。”

Bitcoin's Identity Crisis

比特幣的身份危機

Schwartz's argument resonates with the ongoing identity crisis within the Bitcoin community. The contentious blockchain split that gave birth to Bitcoin Cash (BCH) exemplifies the challenges of determining the legitimate heir to the Bitcoin name. Ultimately, each user's choice of allegiance stems not from a mere preference for a particular label but rather from the principles and values that guide the underlying network.

施瓦茨的觀點與比特幣社群中持續存在的認同危機產生了共鳴。有爭議的區塊鏈分裂催生了比特幣現金（BCH），這反映了確定比特幣名稱合法繼承人所面臨的挑戰。最終，每個使用者對忠誠的選擇不僅源自於對特定標籤的偏好，而是源自於指導底層網路的原則和價值觀。

The Role of Full Nodes and Hash Power

全節點和算力的作用

At the heart of Bitcoin's decentralized architecture lies the intricate relationship between full nodes and hash power. Full nodes, the backbone of the peer-to-peer network, meticulously validate transactions and maintain a complete copy of the blockchain. This ensures the integrity and resilience of the system.

比特幣去中心化架構的核心在於全節點和算力之間錯綜複雜的關係。全節點是點對點網路的支柱，精心驗證交易並維護區塊鏈的完整副本。這確保了系統的完整性和彈性。

Hash power, on the other hand, is the computational firepower employed by miners to process transactions and secure the network. While hash power plays a crucial role, Schwartz contends that it should not be the sole arbiter of Bitcoin's identity and governance.

另一方面，哈希能力是礦工用來處理交易和保護網路的運算能力。雖然算力發揮著至關重要的作用，但施瓦茨認為，它不應該成為比特幣身分和治理的唯一仲裁者。

Schwartz's Call for Rational Choice

施瓦茨呼籲理性選擇

Schwartz advocates for a more rational approach to cryptocurrency governance, one that prioritizes the needs and preferences of the users themselves. Rather than blindly following the dictates of those wielding hash power, users should make informed decisions based on the network's underlying values and capabilities.

施瓦茨主張採用更合理的加密貨幣治理方法，優先考慮使用者本身的需求和偏好。使用者不應盲目遵循那些掌握算力的人的指令，而應根據網路的潛在價值和功能做出明智的決定。

"Rational users will choose the network that best meets their needs," Schwartz said. "They will look at the network's characteristics, such as its security, scalability, and fees, and make a decision based on what is most important to them."

「理性的用戶會選擇最能滿足他們需求的網絡，」施瓦茨說。 “他們將關注網路的特徵，例如安全性、可擴展性和費用，並根據對他們最重要的因素做出決定。”

Implications for the Future

對未來的影響

Schwartz's critique has sparked a wider dialogue within the cryptocurrency community, raising fundamental questions about the nature of governance in decentralized digital currency ecosystems. It highlights the need for robust and adaptable governance models that can effectively represent the will and trust of the communities they serve.

施瓦茨的批評引發了加密貨幣社群內更廣泛的對話，提出了有關去中心化數位貨幣生態系統治理本質的基本問題。它強調需要一個強大且適應性強的治理模型，能夠有效地代表其所服務的社區的意願和信任。

As cryptocurrencies continue to evolve, the ongoing debate over governance and identity will play a pivotal role in shaping their future trajectory. Schwartz's challenge to Bitcoin's established power dynamics is a timely reminder of the complexities and challenges involved in navigating the uncharted waters of decentralized governance.

隨著加密貨幣的不斷發展，關於治理和身分的持續爭論將在塑造其未來發展軌跡方面發揮關鍵作用。施瓦茨對比特幣既定權力動態的挑戰及時提醒人們，在去中心化治理的未知領域中航行所涉及的複雜性和挑戰。